长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (1): 44-54.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202001005

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国城际技术转移等级体系空间演化与关联机制

段德忠1,2, 谌  颖2, 张  杨1,2*   

  1. (1.华东师范大学全球创新与发展研究院,上海 200062; 2.华东师范大学城市与区域科学学院, 上海 200241)
  • 出版日期:2020-01-20 发布日期:2020-03-24

Identification and Spatial Evolution of Inter-City Technology Transfer Hierarchy System in China

DUAN De-zhong1,2, CHEN Ying2, ZHANG Yang1,2   

  1. (1. Institute for Global Innovation and Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; 2. School of Urban & Regional Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)
  • Online:2020-01-20 Published:2020-03-24

摘要: 加快创新技术转移,构建符合科技创新规律的国家技术转移体系是服务于创新驱动发展战略的必然选择。以城际专利转让刻画城际技术转移,基于城市技术转移的多维性建构城际技术转移指数评价模型,并基于非对称相互依赖理论建构城际技术转移体系划分模型,从而对2001~2015年中国城际技术转移等级体系的时空演化格局和关联机制进行了揭示。研究发现:(1)2001~2015年,京津地区,长三角地区和珠三角地区是中国城际技术转移网络的核心三角,另外成渝地区也逐渐成为中国中西部地区的技术转移中心,从而与京津地区,长三角地区和珠三角地区共同架构了中国城际技术转移网络的四边形格局;(2)2001~2015年,中国城市技术转移等级体系不断细分,呈现出由上海向北京演替的格局,但至2015末,中国城市技术转移等级体系尚未完全形成,较多高等级技术转移等级类型缺失;(3)中国城际技术转移网络的生长演化没有体现出诸如社会网络“强强关联”下等级梯度扩散效应,而是呈跳跃态、跨层次进行转移;(4)中国城际技术转移活动高度遵循宏观上的空间集聚规律和微观上的地理邻近效应。

Abstract: The essence of China taking the path of independent innovation and the implementation of innovation-driven development strategy is to get rid of dependence on foreign technology and achieve technological independence and leadership. It is an inevitable choice to serve the innovation-driven development strategy by building a technology transfer system that conforms to the law of scientific and technological innovation, thereby accelerating the transfer of technology and the transformation of scientific and technological achievements. Viewing patent transfer as a surrogate for technology transfer, this paper constructs an evaluation model of inter-city technology transfer index based on the multidimensionality of technology transfer, and then builds a division model of inter-city technology transfer system based on the theory of asymmetric interdependence, and thus the spatial-temporal evolution of China’s intercity technology transfer system from 2001 to 2015 was revealed. We first find that from 2001 to 2015, the Beijing-Tianjin region, the Yangtze River Delta region and the Pearl River Delta region were the core triangles of China’s inter-city technology transfer network, and the Chengdu-Chongqing region gradually became a center for technology transfer in the Central and Western regions of China. Therefore, the structure of the quadrangle of China’s inter-city technology transfer network was constructed. Secondly, from 2001 to 2015, China’s inter-city technology transfer system continued to be subdivided, showing the pattern of being directed by Shanghai to Beijing. However, by the end of this study, the grade system of inter-city technology transfer in China has not yet been fully formed.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨 琳,何 芳,陈天明. 基于弹性理念的城市用地开发战略研究——以上海市宝山区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 360 .
[2] 谢 洪,钟敦伦,李 泳,韦方强. 长江上游泥石流灾害的特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 94 -99 .
[3] 刘腊美 龙天渝 李崇明. 三峡水库上游流域非点源颗粒态磷污染负荷研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 320 .
[4] 贺芳芳|史军. 上海地区夏季气温变化对用电负荷的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(12): 1462 .
[5] 陈然|姚小军|闫超|彭瑶|张洋|赵言文. 基于GIS和组合赋权法的农村生态功能适宜性评价及管制分区[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(06): 720 .
[6] 刘培亮,毛德华,周慧,何晴亲. 1990~2013年资水流域汛期径流量变化规律分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(s): 6 .
[7] 秦文浩, 夏琨, 叶晓东, 纪风强. 竺山湾流域河湖系统污染物总量控制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(05): 822 -829 .
[8] 胡继亮 熊自洁 张悦 高婷. 2019年2期自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[9] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[10] 潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529 -2539 .