长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (1): 79-89.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202001008

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

重庆市生态保护红线区生态系统服务价值时空演变特征及其驱动

邓  伟1,2,周  渝1*,张  勇1,孙  荣3   

  1. (1.重庆市生态环境科学研究院,重庆400020;2.重庆大学煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室,重庆 400044;3.华侨大学化工学院,厦门361021)
  • 出版日期:2020-01-20 发布日期:2020-03-24

Spatio-temporal Evolution Characteristics of  Ecosystem Service Value in Chongqing Ecological Red Line Area

DENG Wei1,2,ZHOU Yu1,ZHANG Yong1,SUN Rong3   

  1. (1.Chongqing  Research Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Chongqing 401147,China;2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing 400044,China;3. Chemical Engineering Institute of Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021,China)
  • Online:2020-01-20 Published:2020-03-24

摘要: 生态保护红线是保障区域生态安全的底线,生态保护意义重大。以重庆市生态保护红线区为研究对象,采用影响生态系统服务状况的生态参数修订“中国生态系统单位面积生态服务价值当量表”,综合分析了该区域2000~2015年间生态系统服务价值时空演变特征及其驱动因素。结果显示:(1)重庆市生态保护红线区生态系统类型主要以森林为主,占比达到了75%以上;时段内森林、湿地和人工表面面积呈增加趋势,农田和裸土持续减少;(2)15年间,研究区ESV增加了87.09亿元,增幅为6.63%,但增速呈逐渐减弱趋势;各类ESV中森林贡献率最大,其次为湿地和草地;研究区生态系统服务类型主要是气候调节和水文调节服务,且水文调节服务ESV在时段内增加趋势最为显著;(3)ESV价值密度最高的区域主要分布在大巴山、方斗山、川河盖、四面山、金佛山等中低山区;时段内主城区“四山”、金佛山、黑山,以及中部川东平行岭谷的精华山、黄草山、雪宝山区ESV呈明显增加趋势,城口县和巫溪县交界地区、巫山县北部、奉节县中部、彭水县北部、黔江区南部、以及江津区、綦江区南部ESV呈轻微减少趋势,全市有36个区县ESV呈增加趋势,3个区县ESV有所减少;(4)湿地面积虽小,但其ESV总量仅次于森林,且单位面积ESV较其他类型更高,应更加注重对湿地的有效保护;(5)城镇化率和农村居民人均纯收入是研究区ESV变化的主要驱动因素,说明生态保护红线区生态系统服务与区域社会经济发展基本耦合。

Abstract: Ecological red line, also known as “ecological conservation red line, is the bottom line to ensure regional ecological security, which is of great significance for ecological protection. How to establish and improve its performance appraisal and ecological compensation mechanism is currently a problem worthy of attention. This paper takes the ecological red line in chongqing as the research object, and uses the ecological parameters affecting the status of ecosystem services to revise the “ecosystem service equivalent value per unit area in China. ”. The spatio-temporal evolution characteristics and driving factors of ecosystem service value(ESV) in this region between 2000 and 2015 were comprehensively analyzed.The results shows that: ①The main type of ecosystem in in Chongqing ecological red line is forest, accounting for more than 75%; During the period, forest, wetland and artificial surface area increased, while farmland and bare soil continue to decrease.②Among 15 years, ESV in the study area increased by 8.709 billion yuan, an increase of 6.63%, but the growth rate is gradually decreasing.Forest contributes the most to ESV, followed by wetland and grassland. The main types of ecosystem services in the study area are climate regulation and hydrological regulation services, and the ESV of hydrological regulation services has the most significant increasing trend in the period of time. ③The areas with the highest ESV value density are mainly distributed in the middle and low mountain areas such as Daba Mountain, Fangdoushan Mountain, Chuanhegai Mountain, Simian Mountain and Jinfo Mountain. During the period, ESV in the main urban areas such as Four Mountains, Jinfo Mountain and Heishan Mountain, as well as the elite mountains, Huangcaoshan Mountain and Xuebaoshan Mountain in the parallel valleys of Eastern Sichuan, show a marked increasing trend. ESV in the junction areas of Chengkou County and Wuxi County, northern Wushan County, central Fengjie County, northern Pengshui County, southern Qianjiang District, Southern Jiangjin District and southern Qijiang District show a slightly decreasing trend, and ESV in 36 districts and counties increase in the whole city. In addition, ESV decrease in three districts and counties.④Although the wetland area is small, its total ESV is second only to forests, and the ESV per unit area is higher than other types. More attention should be paid to the effective protection of wetlands.⑤Urbanization rate and per capita net income of rural residents are the main driving factors of ESV changes in the study area, which indicates that ecosystem services in the ecological red line are basically coupled with regional social and economic development.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张 虹. 三峡重庆库区消落区基本特征与生态功能分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 374 .
[2] 陈宁波,王 辉,江洪泽. 市场经济条件下珍贵可再生资源之灭绝探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 556 .
[3] 宋 敏,张安录.  湖北省农地资源正外部性价值量估算——基于对农地社会与生态之功能和价值分类的分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 314 .
[4] 焦文献|陈兴鹏. 基于STIRPAT模型的甘肃省环境影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(01): 105 .
[5] 马仁锋. 中国长江三角洲城市群创意产业发展趋势及效应分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(01): 1 .
[6] 王彬俨, 严冬春, 文安邦, 陈佳村. 三峡水库干流消落带沉积泥沙粒径特征及其物源意义[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1421 -1429 .
[7] 李丹, 郭生练, 洪兴骏, 郭靖. 汉江流域1960~2014年降雨极值时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1448 -1456 .
[8] 王毅,郭跃. 喀斯特地貌区植被覆盖与地形因子的空间关系分析——以贵州普定县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(01): 86 .
[9] 张英浩, 陈江龙, 程 钰. 环境规制对中国区域绿色经济效率的影响机理研究——基于超效率模型和空间面板计量模型实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2407 -2418 .
[10] 刘金科, 韩贵琳, 阳昆桦, 柳满. 九龙江流域河水溶解态碳的时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2578 -2587 .