长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (4): 928-937.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202004014

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江干流宜昌-监利段洲滩湿生植物群落特征及其驱动因子分析

徐强强1,2, 袁赛波3, 申明华2, 刘学勤2   

  1. (1. 大连海洋大学, 辽宁 大连 116023; 2. 中国科学院水生生物研究所淡水生态与生物技术国家重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430072; 3. 武汉市防洪勘测设计有限公司, 湖北 武汉 430014)
  • 出版日期:2020-04-20 发布日期:2020-06-12

Assemblage Structure Characteristics of Hygrophytic Plants and Their Driving Factors in Sand Bars in Yichang-Jianli  Section of the Yangtze Mainstem

XU Qiang-qiang1, 2, YUAN Sai-bo3, SHEN Ming-hua2, LIU Xue-qin2   

  1. (1. Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China; 3. Wuhan City Flood Control Survey and Design Institute, Wuhan 430014, China)
  • Online:2020-04-20 Published:2020-06-12

摘要: 摘要: 为了解长江干流洲滩湿地植物的群落结构特征及其驱动因子,于2018年3~5月对干流宜昌-监利5个江段洲滩的湿生植物开展了调查。共采集湿生植物88种,隶属于26科73属,其中菊科(Compositae)、禾本科(Gramineae)、蓼科(Polygonaceae)占优势,狗牙根、薹草、牛鞭草、虉草为主要优势种。采集样方平均种类数为6种,平均密度为88.9 ind/m2,平均生物量(地上部分干重)为55.8 g/m2。采集洲滩湿生植物群落结构时空差异较大。枝城江段洲滩样方物种数、密度和生物量均为最大,荆州洲滩均最小。样方密度在3~5月间呈下降趋势,生物量则呈上升趋势。划分了薹草、狗牙根、牛鞭草-紫菀等10个稳定群落。典范对应分析表明湿生植物群落组成主要受到黏粒比例、相对水面高程、土壤含水率以及土壤总有机质含量的影响,其中影响最大的是黏粒比例。样方总生物量沿相对水面高程、总有机质、土壤含水率的变化趋势一致,即先增大后减小;而与黏粒含量的关系不明显。分析认为洲滩湿生植物分布格局是在水文过程影响下,由底质、水分及营养共同作用的结果。

Abstract: Abstract:In order to understand assemblage structure characteristics of hygrophytes and their driving factors in the Yangtze mainstem, we carried out field investigations of hygrophytes in five sand bars in Yichang-Jianli section during March-May 2018. A total of 88 species of hygrophytes, belonging to 26 families, 73 genera were collected. Among them, Compositae, Gramineae, Polygonaceae were dominant,Cynodon dactylon、Carex leiorhyncha、Hemarthria altissima、Phalaris arundinacea were the predominant species. The average species number in plots was 6, the average density was 89 ind/m2 and average biomass (above ground part, dry mass) 55.8 g/m2. Assemblage structure characteristics of hygrophytes varied in space and time. Plot species number, density and biomass in the Zhicheng section were the largest, while those in Jingzhou section were the smallest. Density of hygrophytes decreased from March to May, while biomass increased. Ten dominant assemblages were identified including Carex leiorhyncha, Cynodon dactylon, Hemarthria altissima-Aster tataricus and the others. Canonical correspondence analysis indicated hygrophytic plant assemblages were mainly affected by clay proportion (Clay), elevation above water (ELEV), soil moisture (SM)and total organic matter content in soil (TOM), and the most important one was Clay. Moreover, plot total biomass changed with ELEV, SM and TOM in a similar way, i.e. it increased first and then decreased along these factors. The relationship between plot biomass and Clay was insignificant. We concluded that hygrophytic assemblages in sand bars were driven by hydrological regimes under which substrate, soil moisture and nutrients acted together to shape the assemblages. 

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 许莉莉|蔡道明|吴宜进. 1959~2008年湖北省暴雨的气候变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(09): 1143 .
[2] 王肖惠, 陈爽, 秦海旭, 管蓓. 基于事故风险源的城市环境风险分区研究——以南京市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(03): 453 -461 .
[3] 史超, 夏军, 佘敦先, 万蕙, 黄金凤. 气候变化下汉江上游林地植被生态需水量的时空演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 580 -589 .
[4] 胡继亮 熊自洁 张悦 高婷. 2019年2期自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[5] 王淑平, 程和琴, 郑树伟, 徐韦, 陈钢, 赵军凯. 近期长江张家洲南水道强冲刷机理与趋势分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2070 .
[6] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[7] 陶江平, 温静雅, 贺达, 侯轶群, 胡望斌, 曹晓红, 陈小娟, 陈凯麒, 常剑波.  

上行过鱼设施过鱼效果监测研究进展 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2270 -2282 .

[8] 张亚楠, 陈振杰, 张云倩, 梅梦媛.  

兼顾生态系统功能和生态需求强度的城市生态用地重要性评价——以长沙市为例 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2358 -2367 .

[9] 赵小风, 李娅娅, 赵雲泰, 田志强. 基于地理探测器的土地开发度时空差异及其驱动因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2425 -2433 .
[10] 王宇环, 靳 诚, 安鸿波, 刘 月. 基于低碳出行方式的南京市本地居民景点可达性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2443 -2452 .