长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (6): 1422-1431.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202006016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于BP神经网络和协调度的河流健康评价

傅春1* ,邓俊鹏 2,吴远卓3   

  1. (1. 南昌大学管理学院,江西  南昌 330031;2. 南昌大学建筑工程学院,
    江西 南昌 330031;3.南昌大学公共管理学院,江西  南昌  330031)
  • 出版日期:2020-06-20 发布日期:2020-07-20

River Health Assessment Based on BP Neural Network and Coordination Degree

FU Chun 1, DENG Jun-peng 2, WU Yuan-zhuo 3   

  1. (1. School of Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering,
    Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China; 3. School of Public Administration, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China)
  • Online:2020-06-20 Published:2020-07-20

摘要: 摘要: 为了对河流的健康状况进行评价,以解决河流健康评价中评价指标权重人为主观性太强的问题。采用BP神经网络对袁河的自然生态状况和社会服务功能分别进行模拟,并结合协调度来判断两者之间是否和谐发展。结果表明:(1)2016年度袁河宜春段和新余段河流健康综合评价指数T>0.6,均达到健康等级;其中宜春段的协调度指数D=0.8,达到良好协调类别,新余段的协调度指数D=0.79,达到中度协调类别;(2)2006和2010年袁河宜春段和新余段的自然生态状况指数f(x)较前一年有所下降,经对比指标数据,主要因素是袁河2006和2010年水质由前一年Ⅲ类水质下降为Ⅳ类水质;(3)2016年袁河新余段的自然生态状况指数f(x)=0.59 ,要远小于社会服务功能指数g(y)=0.68 ,所以今后对于袁河新余段的河流政策应偏向于河流的自然生态修复。

Abstract: Abstract:In order to evaluate the health conditions of rivers and solve the problem of the highly subjective weights of evaluation indicators in river health assessment, BP neural network is used to simulate respectively the ecological status and social service function of the Yuan River and to judge by coordination degree whether they are developing in a coordinative way. The results show that: (1) The comprehensive evaluation index of the river health within Yichun section and Xinyu section in 2016 is greater than 0.6, which indicates that the river is healthy. The coordination index of Yichun section is 0.8, which shows it is well coordinated. In comparison, the coordination index of Xinyu section is 0.79, which means it is moderately coordinated. (2) Compared with the previous year, the natural ecological status index  fx of Yichun section and Xinyu section in 2006 and 2010 decreased, comparative indicator data ,which was mainly caused by the degraded water quality of the Yuan River that went down from the previous Grade III to the present Grade IV;(3) The natural ecological status index fx of Xinyu section in 2016 stands at 0.59, which is much smaller than the social service function index of 0.68. Therefore, it is suggested that the natural ecological restoration be privileged in the future river policy for Xinyu section of the Yuan River.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 吴开亚| 郭旭| 王文秀| 张浩. 上海市居民消费碳排放的实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(5): 535 .
[2] 张晓瑞 |方创琳 |王振波 |马海涛. 基于RBF神经网络的城市建成区面积预测研究——兼与BP神经网络和线性回归对比分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(06): 691 .
[3] 邹 进|张友权|潘 锋. 基于二元水循环理论的水资源承载力质量能综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(01): 117 .
[4] 姚仪敏, 闫浩亮, 陈建珍, 刘盼春, 松井勤, 田小海. 利用微气象测定仪MINCER分析热害条件下的水稻冠层微气象特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(06): 1067 -1071 .
[5] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[6] 曾忠平, 邹尚君, 彭浩轩. 基于重力空间熵的城市湿地压力模型构建研究——以武汉南湖湿地为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1745 .
[7] 葛芳, 田波, 周云轩, 何青, 钱伟伟. 海岸带典型盐沼植被消浪功能观测研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1784 .
[8] 王兆夺, 黄春长, 李晓刚, 周亚利, 庞奖励, 查小春. 淮河上游全新世古洪水沉积学特征及古洪水事件气候背景[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2122 -2131 .
[9] 柯杭 王小军 尹义星 罗志文. 衡水市1961-2015年极端降水和干旱的时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[10] 王恒博, 姚顺波, 郭亚军, 赵敏娟.  

基于生态足迹服务价值法的生态承载力时空演化 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2316 -2327 .