长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (10): 2136-2145.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202010003

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江中游地区贫困村空间分异研究

王  雄1,2,龚  健1,2* ,孟现勇3,4,王  浩5,李士成1,2   

  1. (1.中国地质大学(武汉)公共管理学院,湖北 武汉 430074;2.国土资源法律评价工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430074;3.中国农业大学资源与环境学院,北京 100094;4.香港大学土木工程系,香港 999077;5.中国水利水电科学研究院,北京 100038)
  • 出版日期:2020-10-20 发布日期:2020-11-18

Spatial Differentiation of Poor Villages in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River

WANG Xiong 1,2, GONG Jian 1,2, MENG Xian-yong 3,4, WANG Hao 5,LI Shi-cheng 1,2   

  1. (1. School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;2. Key Laboratory of Land Resources Law Evaluation Engineering, Wuhan 430074, China;3.College of Resources and Environmental Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China;4.Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong,Hongkong 999077,China; 5.China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038,China)
  • Online:2020-10-20 Published:2020-11-18

摘要: 以长江中游地区的湖北省、湖南省以及江西省在十三五规划当中所涉及的贫困村为研究对象,采用核密度分析、最近邻指数以及空间自相关等空间统计法,对贫困村的数量、空间分布密度及模式、垂直梯度分异等特征进行了分析。结果表明:(1)长江中游地区贫困村省际分布有所不同。数量上湖南省>湖北省>江西省,并且同时存在典型的“平原型”贫困村和“山区型”贫困村,且在省域、国贫县、省贫县、非贫县、城市圈等多级尺度下的数量特征不同;(2)在城市群或者城市圈内,贫困村分布呈现低值集聚,而省域交界处的山区多为贫困村分布的高值集聚区;在巫山、雪峰山和武陵山的贫困连片分布区,贫困村多呈均匀型分布;在江汉平原地区,出现显著的集聚型分布;(3)贫困村的垂直空间分异显著。贫困村主要分布在海拔<200 m的平原地区,随着海拔的升高,数量不断减少。研究有利于更好地认知和理解长江中游地区的贫困村空间格局,实施更为科学的“精准扶贫”战略。

Abstract: This research examines the poor villages released in the Thirteen-Five Planning of Hubei, Hunan and Jiangxi provinces in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. The Specific Methods of Nuclear Density Analysis (SMDNA), Nearest Neighbor Index (SNI), Kernel Density (KD), Moran Index (MI) and Overlay Analysis (OA) and other spatial analysis methods were selected to analyze the quantity, spatial distribution density and pattern, and vertical differentiation of the poor villages. The results show that: (1) the inter-provincial distribution of poor villages is different in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Hunan having the largest number, followed by Hubei and Jiangxi province, and there are typical “plain” poor villages and “mountainous” poor villages, and the quantitative characteristics are different at multi-level scales such as provincial, national poor counties, provincial poor counties, non-poor counties and urban circles; (2) the distribution of poor villages is low-value clustered in urban groups or urban circles, high-value clustered in mountainous area at the provincial borders; even in the contiguous poor areas of Wushan, Wulingshan and Xuefengshan; and significantly clustered in Jianghan Plain; (3) the vertical space differentiation of poor villages is significant too. The poor villages are mainly distributed in plain area with altitude below 200m, and with the increase of altitude, the number of poor villages is decreasing. The research helps to better understand the spatial pattern of poor villages in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River and implement a more scientific ‘targeted poverty alleviation’ strategy.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张榆霞,刘嘉麒,王立前. 漫湾电站建成后澜沧江下游水质变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 501 -506 .
[2] 彭长青,冯金飞,卞新民. 基于遗传算法和GIS的县域水田种植制度空间布局优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 66 -70 .
[3] 郑明媚,李满春,毛 亮,黎韶光. GIS支持的县域人口迁移空间模型研究——以浙江省临安市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 281 -286 .
[4] 吴莉萍,赵大为,张冬保,王章玮,张晓山. 重庆市汞污染的观测研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 400 -404 .
[5] 黄应生,,陈世俭,吴后建,,朱明勇,. 洪湖演变的驱动力及其生态保护对策分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 504 .
[6] 徐长义,钟登华,曹广晶. 我国水电可持续发展的理性思考[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 535 .
[7] 郑宗生, 周云轩, 刘志国, 田 波. 基于水动力模型及遥感水边线方法的潮滩高程反演[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 756 .
[8] 禹 娜,陈立侨,赵泉鸿. 太湖介形类动物丰度与生物量[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 546 .
[9] 唐华秀,马劲松,战金艳,邓祥征. 江苏省人口数据空间离散化研究及其精度分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 506 .
[10] 李春华,李 宁,史培军. 基于SOM模型的中国耕地压力分类研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 318 .