长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (10): 2229-2238.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202010012

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于改进熵权物元模型的河网尺度物理生境评价——以太湖流域为例

刘垚燚1,2,汪昱昆1,2,3,曾鹏1,2,王话翔1,2,车越1,2*   

  1. (1. 华东师范大学生态与环境科学学院,上海 200241; 2. 上海市城市化生态过程与生态恢复重点实验室,上海 200241; 3. 上海勘测设计研究院有限公司,上海 200050)
  • 出版日期:2020-10-20 发布日期:2020-11-18

Physical Habitat Evaluation on River Network Scale Based on Improved Entropy Weight and Matter Element Model:A Case study of the Taihu Basin

LIU Yao-yi 1,2, WANG Yu-kun 1,2,3, ZENG Peng 1,2, WANG Hua-xiang 1,2, CHE Yue 1,2   

  1. (1. School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China; 2. Shanghai Key Lab for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration, Shanghai 200241, China; 3. Shanghai Investigation, Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200050, China)
  • Online:2020-10-20 Published:2020-11-18

摘要: 平原河网地区社会经济快速发展过程中,河网水系受人类活动干扰强烈,生境退化现象突出。以太湖流域为研究区域,选取盒维数(D)、区域河流坡降(P)、河网复杂度(CR)、河网实际结合度(γ)、区域河网加权曲度(SR)、骨干河网密度(R)等6个物理生境指标,基于改进熵权物元模型,构建了河网尺度的物理生境评价体系。研究结果显示,太湖流域物理生境质量多处于“较好”~“差”等级;生境因子的质量:盒维数(D) >河网复杂度(CR) >区域河网加权曲度(SR)>河网实际结合度(γ)=骨干河网密度(R) >区域河流坡降(P);太湖流域物理生境空间分异现象明显,西部丘陵地区物理生境质量优于城镇化程度高的东部平原地区。河网尺度的物理生境评价体系较为直观的反映了流域物理生境现状,有效的完善了平原河网地区生境评价结果。

Abstract: With the rapid socio-economic development in the plain river network area, river networks are strongly influenced by human activities, which degrades the physical habitat evidently. The Taihu Basin was taking as a case study. Six physical habitat indicators were selected to establish the evaluation system, including the weighted curvature, box dimension, actual integration of river network, regional river slope, river network density and river network complexity. Moreover, the Improved Entropy Weight and Matter Element Model was adopted to quantify the physical habitat of different catchments. The results show that: The quality levels of physical habitat vary mostly between “relatively good” to “bad”. The ranking order of habitat factors is: Box dimension>River network complexity>Regional river network weighted curvature > Actual integration of river network=River network density>Regional river network slope. The spatial variation of physical habitat in the Taihu Basin is obvious, while the quality of physical habitat of the western hilly area is better than that of the highly urbanized eastern plain area. Physical habitat evaluation on the river network scale is capable of representing the status quo of the basin directly, and effectively improves the performance of plain river network evaluation.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李中强, 王双玲, 杨梅, 徐. 基于生态敏感性分析的湖泊保护与利用——以湖北省斧头湖为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 714 .
[2] 陈姗姗, 束炯, 徐建中. 中国若干典型城市对流层NO2时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(12): 1484 .
[3] 赵雲泰 | 黄贤金 | 陈志刚 | 彭佳雯. 基于DEA的中国农地非农化效率及其变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(10): 1228 .
[4] 尹炜, 朱惇, 雷俊山, 贾海燕, 曾祉祥. 丹江口水库典型消落区不同土地利用类型土壤养分分布[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(07): 1185 -1191 .
[5] 彭国照, 邢开瑜, 曹艳秋. 未来30a凉山州水稻盛夏低温危害风险分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(Z1): 103 -110 .
[6] 刘俸霞, 王艳君, 赵晶, 陈雪, 姜彤. 全球升温1.5℃与2.0℃情景下长江中下游地区极端降水的变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 778 -788 .
[7] 吴浪, 周廷刚, 温莉, 刘晓璐, 朱晓波. 基于遥感数据的PM2.5与城市化的时空关系研究——以成渝城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2142 -2152 .
[8] 马小亮, 刘桂民, 吴晓东, 徐海燕, 叶琳琳, 张晓兰. 三江源高寒草甸下溪流溶解性有机碳的季节性输移特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2387 -2394 .
[9] 苏 芳, 郑亚萍, 阚立娜, 蔡 莎. 基于CVM调查法评估城市公共绿地服务价值 ——以西部省会城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2434 -2442 .
[10] 朱立一, 何伟, 朱璧然, . 纳米二氧化硅和铅复合暴露对 斑马鱼幼鱼甲状腺内分泌系统的毒性影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2588 -2596 .