长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (3): 575-590.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202103006

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于不透水表面指数的城市扩张趋势及驱动机制分析——以南京市为例

李发志1,朱高立2,姬  超1,侯大伟1,孙  华1*   

  1. (1.南京农业大学土地管理学院,江苏 南京 210095;2.南京财经大学公共管理学院,江苏 南京 210023)
  • 出版日期:2021-03-20 发布日期:2021-04-07

Analysis on the Trend and Driving Mechanism of Urban Growth Based on Impervious Surface Index:Taking Nanjing City for Example

LI Fa-zhi 1, ZHU Gao-li 2, JI Chao 1, HOU Da-wei 1, SUN Hua 1   

  1. (1.College of Land Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;2.College of Public Administration, Nanjing  University of Finance Economics, Nanjing 210023, China;)
  • Online:2021-03-20 Published:2021-04-07

摘要: 城市扩张趋势及驱动机制研究存在两大难题:(1)传统景观数据的混合像元问题影响城市扩张趋势研究的准确性;(2)城市扩张驱动因子的共线性问题影响驱动机制研究结论的可靠性。针对上述问题,以南京市为例,利用不透水表面分析结果,采用不透水面加权平均重心分析、线性方向均值分析及标准差椭圆分析方法开展2000~2017年城市扩张趋势研究,并利用偏最小二乘回归分析方法对城市扩张驱动机制开展定性及定量分析。结果表明:南京市整体上表现为多中心非同步的蔓延式扩张;2000~2017年的3个时间跨度内,南京市整体的不透水表面扩张速度不断增长,年均不透水表面加权平均重心转移距离分别为303,379,611 m,全市尺度上往顺时针偏北259.12°方向转移2 564 m,具体到各辖区,重心转移距离存在较大差异;城市扩张的外部形态特征具有明显的方向性,2000、2005、2010以及2017年4个时期,不透水表面的标准差椭圆扁率均在2.232以上,主要表现为南北向扩张,各辖区扩张方向性不同;城市外部空间特征及发展战略、河流水系及自然保护区分布、土地利用规划等因素表现为对城市扩张方向的约束和限制作用;第二产业从业人员数量、人口密度、第三产业固定资产投资额、地区生产总值、城乡人均可支配收入等因素成为影响城市扩张规模的主要因素。

Abstract: There exists two difficult issues in study of the trend and driving mechanism of urban expansion: (1) Maxed pixels of traditional landscape data reduce the accuracy of urban expansion trend research. (2) Collinearity of the driving factors affects the reliability of driving mechanism. To fix these problems, taking Nanjing City for example, the impervious surface was used to conduct weighted average barycenter analysis, linear direction mean analysis and standard deviation elliptic analysis to study the urban growth characteristics. Driving mechanism of urban growth was studied through combination analysis qualitatively and quantitatively (Partial least squares regression,PLS). Results showed that imperious surface in Nanjing showed multicentric and inconsonant expansion. Gravity center transfer distance of impervious surface increased over the three periods (2000 to 2005, 2005 to 2010, 2010 to 2017), which annual gravity center transfer distances were 303, 379 and 611m respectively. In general, the gravity center transferred 2 564 m to the direction that 259.12 degrees to the north clockwise. The exterior morphological characteristics of urban growth had obvious directivity, which the oblateness of the standard deviation elliptic of the impervious surface were all larger than 2.23 in 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2017. The external spatial characteristics of the administrative region, distribution of rivers and nature reserves, and the land use plan were the main factors that constrain and limit the direction of urban expansion. The number of employees in the secondary industry, population density, fixed assets investment in the tertiary industry, regional GDP, and per capita disposable income in urban and rural areas were the main factors that influenced the scale of urban expansion.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李宽意,刘正文,王春忠,王传海,史加达,胡耀辉. 低溶解氧对苦草生长的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 670 -673 .
[2] 王毛兰,| 胡春华,周文斌,. 丰水期鄱阳湖氮磷含量变化及来源分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 138 .
[3] 陈振杰, 李满春, 刘永学. 基于GIS的桐庐县农村居民点空间格局研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 180 .
[4] 胡建民, 石忆邵. 略论耕地库兹涅茨曲线在我国的适用性[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 588 .
[5] . 气候资料高精度模拟与土地利用动力学方法在中国水文规划中的应用(论文摘编)[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 649 .
[6] 段学军, 陈 雯. 省域空间开发功能区划方法探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 540 -545 .
[7] 谢 洪,钟敦伦,李 泳,韦方强. 长江上游泥石流灾害的特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 94 -99 .
[8] 李成范,刘岚, 周廷刚,张力, 吴忠芳. 基于定量遥感技术的重庆市热岛效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(1): 60 .
[9] 杨志荣,吴次芳, 靳相木, 姚秋萍. 基于DEA模型的城市用地经济效益比较研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(1): 14 .
[10] 张心怡,刘 敏,孟 飞. 基于RS和GIS的上海城建用地扩展研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 29 -33 .