长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (1): 1-12.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202201001

• 区域可持续发展 •    下一篇

长江经济带技术转移网络结构及影响机制探究

王秋玉1,曾  刚2*,杨文龙3,叶  雷4   

  1. (1.上海社会科学院 经济研究所,上海 200020;2.华东师范大学 中国现代城市研究中心,上海 200062;3.上海社会科学院 世界经济研究所,上海 200020;4.安徽师范大学 经济管理学院,安徽 芜湖 241002)
  • 出版日期:2022-01-20 发布日期:2022-02-09

Research on Structure and Effect Mechanism of Technology Transfer Network in Yangtze River Economic Belt

WANG Qiu-yu1,ZENG Gang2,YANG Wen-long3,YE Lei4   

  1. ( 1. Institute of Economics, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, Shanghai 200020, China; 2. The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;3. Institute of World Economy, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, Shanghai 200020, China; 4. School of Economics and Management, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241002, China)
  • Online:2022-01-20 Published:2022-02-09

摘要: 技术转移是区域降低研发成本、创造新技术的重要途径和来源。以长江经济带为例,从incoPat专利数据库获取1985~2018年城市间专利转让数据,借助空间网络分析、模体挖掘、指数随机图模型分析方法,对长江经济带技术转移网络结构及影响机制进行探索。研究发现,在空间格局上,长三角是长江经济带技术转移网络中的创新高地与和核心区域,内部呈现组团式、多中心发展格局,且与外界联系紧密;上游区域中成渝技术转移非常活跃,在创新塌陷地呈“钉”式发展势头;中游城市分散式发展。在局部模体上,顶级城市的技术转移模式呈现规律性特征,均注重已有合作关系的维护,占据结构洞位置有助于提升城市创新能级。在网络形成机制上,网络具有较强的自组织生长能力和弱聚敛性;城市创新质量、创新数量、经济水平越高的城市之间发生技术转移的概率越高,网络等级性将进一步强化,马太效应明显;技术认同比产业认同更有利于转移关系的建立,地理邻近效应微弱,省级行政壁垒仍然存在。综上,重视高质量技术的研发、拓展技术转移关系有助于提升城市地位,针对性寻找技术邻近型合作伙伴以及政府有效引导均能促进技术转移。

Abstract: Technology transfer is an important way to reduce R&D cost and create new technology. Basing on the patent transfer data from incoPat patent database from 1985 to 2018, this study explores the network structure and mechanism of technology transfer network in the Yangtze river economic belt through the methods of spatial network analysis, module mining and exponential random graph model analysis. The netwook structure shows that the downstream area of the Yangtze river economic belt takes the lead in the technology transfer network, while the upstream region rises like nail and the middle reaches develop independently. The Yangtze river delta cooperate intensely with a multi-center pattern and is closely connected with the others, meanwhile, Chengdu and Chongqing rise rapidly to catch up with these cities. Module ananalysis finds that top cities pay more attention to the maintenance of existing cooperative relationship, and occupying the structural hole position is crucial for latecomer to catch up. Research on influential mechanism shows that the higher the technology quality, innovation quantity and economic level of cities, the higher is the probability of technology transfer activity to take place, the Matthew effect will strengthen the network hierarchy. Technical identification is more effective than industrial similarity in promoting the establishment of transfer relations. Provincial administrative barriers still exist and geographical proximity effect is weak. Therefore, focusing on the research and development of high quality technology and expanding the relationship of technology transfer helps to improve the status of city in the network, looking for partners with similar knowledge structure or administrative areas are more likely to succeed.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 余光辉, 耿军军| 周佩纯|朱佳文| 李振国. 基于碳平衡的区域生态补偿量化研究——以长株潭绿心昭山示范区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(04): 454 .
[2] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[3] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[4] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[5] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[6] 刘钢, 刘坤琳, 汪玮茜, 赵爽. 水质感知视角下水库移民满意度分析——基于有序逻辑回归的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .
[7] 戢晓峰, 刘丁硕. 基于3D理论与SEM的县域交通可达性与空间贫困的耦合机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1360 .
[8] 张大鹏, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 岳洋, 任亚文. 上海大都市区物流企业区位分布特征及其演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[9] 佘颖, 刘耀彬. 国内外绿色发展制度演化的历史脉络及启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1370 .
[10] 侯雯嘉, 陈长青, 乔辉, 孙新素, 周曙东. 1980~2009年长江下游地区油菜冻害时空特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .