长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (1): 222-233.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202201021

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

江苏省乡村三生功能耦合协调时空变化特征分析

程宪波1,陶宇1,欧维新1,2*
  

  1. (1. 南京农业大学公共管理学院(土地管理学院),江苏 南京 210095;2. 农村土地资源利用与整治国家地方联合工程研究中心,江苏 南京 210095)
  • 出版日期:2022-01-20 发布日期:2022-02-09

Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Evolutions of Rural Production-Living-Ecological Function and Coupling Coordination in Jiangsu

CHENG Xian-bo1 ,TAO Yu1, OU Wei-xin1,2   

  1. (1.College of Public Administration (College of Land Management), Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;2. National & Joint Engineering Research Center for Rural Land Resources Use and Consolidation, Nanjing 210095, China)
  • Online:2022-01-20 Published:2022-02-09

摘要: 掌握乡村三生功能水平,揭示功能间的相互关系与演变规律是未来乡村规划与发展的基础。基于“三生”空间与土地多功能理论基础,采用多指标综合法与耦合协调模型,测算江苏省2005、2018年45县(市)乡村三生功能大小,各功能之间耦合度、耦合协调度类型并分析了其时空变化特征。结果表明:(1)2005~2018年,江苏省乡村生产、生活和生态功能均提升;(2)各县市乡村生产、生活和生态各功能间耦合度均为协调耦合;(3)乡村三生功能耦合协调度呈现勉强协调型、初级协调型和中级协调型三类;时间上,由濒临失调型以倒“U”型向协调演进,空间上各县市差异客观存在;三生功能中两两功能状态差异明显,并具有明显的南北差距。未来需加强江苏省乡村绿色生产、绿色宜居等建设,以及统筹规划、缩小南北乡村差距。

Abstract: They are basis master rural production-living-ecological function level and reveal the complex relationship among them for rural planning and development in China. In this paper, we established an index system for rural production-living-ecological function with the production-living-ecological space theory, multifunctional land theory, based on the coupling coordination model was built. Therefore, we calculated the level of production, living, and ecological functions, coupling degree and coupling coordinate degree(2005,2018), conducted spatial comparison and temporal analysis of 45 counties in Jiangsu, the results are shown: (1) The level of production, living, and ecological functions were improved in rural from 2005 to 2018; (2) The production-living-ecological, production-living, production-ecological, and living-ecological function coupling degree’s types were all coordination coupling; (3)There were three types of coupling coordination degree, grudgingly coordination, elementary coordination and moderate coordination appeared in rural production-living-ecological. In the time dimension, it was evolved from grudgingly incongruous type to higher level coupling, coordination type, as an inverted “U” form, in space, it exhibited significant difference among 45counties. There were obvious differences of coupling coordination status among production-living, production-ecological, and living-ecological functions and a clear North-South gap. It is going to focus on rural green-production and improving living environment, as well as overall planning and narrowing the gap of between the north and south in the future.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李建豹, 黄贤金, 孟 浩, 周 艳, 徐国良, 吴常艳. “十二五”时期中国碳排放强度累积目标完成率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1655 .
[2] 熊鸿斌, 周凌燕. 基于PSR-灰靶模型的巢湖环湖防洪治理工程生态环境影响评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1977 -1987 .
[3] 李嘉译, 匡鸿海, 谭 超, 王佩佩. 长江经济带城市扩张的时空特征与生态响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2153 -2161 .
[4] 唐子珺, 陈龙, 覃军, 郑翔. 武汉市一次污染过程的局地流场和边界层结构的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[5] 王东香, 张一鸣, 王锐诚, 赵炳炎, 张志麒, 黄咸雨, . 神农架大九湖泥炭地孔隙水溶解有机碳特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2568 -2577 .
[6] 王海力, 韩光中, 谢贤健. 基于DEA模型的西南地区耕地利用效率时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2784 -2795 .
[7] 汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .
[8] 吕乐婷, 王晓蕊, 孙才志, 张 杰. 基于SWAT模型的细河流域蓝水绿水资源量时空分布研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 39 -47 .
[9] 赵树成, 张展羽, 夏继红, 杨洁, 盛丽婷, 唐丹, 陈晓安, . 鄱阳湖滨岸土壤磷素吸附特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 166 -174 .
[10] 阮甜, 查芊郁, 杨茹, 高超. 全球升温1.5℃和2.0℃对长江寸滩站以上流域径流的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 407 -415 .