长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (1): 234-243.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202201022

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

生态公益林补偿、收入水平与政策满意度——基于生态保护红线区农户调查数据的实证分析

丘水林1,2,靳乐山1,2*
  

  1. (1.中国农业大学人文与发展学院,北京 100193;2.中国农业大学中国生态补偿政策研究中心,北京 100193)
  • 出版日期:2022-01-20 发布日期:2022-02-09

Forest Ecological Benefit Compensation,Income Level and Policy Satisfaction: Empirical Analysis Based on the Survey Data of Farmers in Ecological Protection Red Line Area

QIU Shui-lin1,2, JIN Le-shan1,2   

  1. (1. Colloge of Humanities and Development Studies, China Agriculture University, Beijing 100193, China; 2. China Eco-compensation Policy Research Center, China Agriculture University, Beijing 100193, China)
  • Online:2022-01-20 Published:2022-02-09

摘要: 生态公益林补偿政策实施20 a来对森林可持续经营发挥了重要作用,但其对生态保护红线区农户的实施效果究竟如何值得深入研究。基于江西省和湖北省4个县(区)生态保护红线区农户调查数据,利用OLS回归和分位数回归分析生态公益林补偿对农户收入水平的影响,利用有序Probit模型分析农户政策满意度的影响因素。结果表明:(1)生态公益林补偿对生态保护红线区低收入农户有显著正向影响;(2)农户对生态公益林补偿政策的满意度较高,达到65.81%,但仍存在政策改进空间;(3)生态公益林补偿、收入状况和政策感知程度对生态保护红线区农户政策满意度均有显著正向影响。为此,应加大生态保护红线区生态公益林补偿力度,特别是要重视低收入农户的“造血式”产业扶贫工作;同时,强化政策宣传公示力度和资金兑现落实力度,切实提高农户的政策满意度。

Abstract: Since the implementation of forest ecological benefit compensation policy for 20 years, it has played an important role in sustainable forest management, but its implementation effect on farmers in ecological protection red line area is worth further study. Based on the survey data of farmers in ecological protection red line area in four counties (districts) of Jiangxi Province and Hubei Province, OLS regression and quantile regression were used to analyze the impact of forest ecological benefit compensation on farmers’ income level, and ordered probit model was used to analyze the influencing factors of farmers’ policy satisfaction. The results show that: (1)Forest ecological benefit compensation has a significant positive impact on the low-income farmers in the ecological protection red line area; (2)Farmers’ satisfaction with the compensation policy of ecological public welfare forest is high, reaching 65.81%, but there is still room for policy improvement; (3)Forest ecological benefit compensation, income status and policy perception have a significant positive impact on farmers’ policy satisfaction in ecological protection red line area. Therefore, we should increase the intensity of forest ecological benefit compensation in the ecological protection red line area, especially pay attention to the "hematopoietic" industrial poverty alleviation work of low-income farmers; at the same time, strengthen the publicity of policies and the implementation of funds, so as to improve farmers’ satisfaction.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .
[2] 孙惠惠, 章新平, 罗紫东, 尚程鹏, 贺新光, 饶志国.  近53 a来长江流域极端降水指数特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1879 .
[3] 吴浪, 周廷刚, 温莉, 刘晓璐, 朱晓波. 基于遥感数据的PM2.5与城市化的时空关系研究——以成渝城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2142 -2152 .
[4] 方琳, 吴凤平, 王新华, 余燕团.  

基于共同前沿SBM模型的农业用水效率测度及改善潜力 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2293 -2304 .

[5] 吕乐婷, 王晓蕊, 孙才志, 张 杰. 基于SWAT模型的细河流域蓝水绿水资源量时空分布研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 39 -47 .
[6] 胡兴坤, 高 雷, 杨 浩, 刘绍平, 陈大庆, 段辛斌 . 长江中游黄石江段鱼类早期资源现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 60 -67 .
[7] 胡晓, 余英俊, 魏永才, 洪亮, 张永年, 石小涛, 吴睿. 基于过鱼效果评估的涵洞鱼道堰式挡板性能研究与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 134 -143 .
[8] 秦立, 付宇文, 吴起鑫, 安艳玲, 刘瑞禄, 吕婕梅, 吴振宇. 赤水河流域土地利用结构对氮素输出的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 175 -183 .
[9] 李艳, 马百胜, 杨宣. 两类ENSO事件对中国东部地区极端降水的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 469 -482 .
[10] 李科, 张萌, 刘雄军, 杨丽敏, 薛涛涛, 欧阳珊, 吴小平. 陡水湖流域大型底栖动物群落结构及其环境影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(04): 939 -949 .