长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (5): 1101-1115.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202205014

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江沿线城市经济增长与环境质量影响关系的实证研究

安敏1,3,李文佳2,安慧2*
  

  1. (1. 湖北省水电工程施工与管理重点实验室(三峡大学),湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 三峡大学水利与环境学院,湖北 宜昌 443002;3. 三峡大学经济与管理学院,湖北 宜昌 443002)
  • 出版日期:2022-05-20 发布日期:2022-06-02

An Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Urban Economic Growth and Environmental Quality Along the Yangtze River

AN Min1,3, LI Wen-Jia2, AN Hui2   

  1. (1.Key Laboratory of Construction and Management of Hydropower Engineering in Hubei Province (China Three Gorges University) Yichang 443002,China; 2. College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China; 3. College of Economics and Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)
  • Online:2022-05-20 Published:2022-06-02

摘要:  由于长江沿线区域资源禀赋差异显著、产业分布不均、收入差距大等导致长江沿线各地区生产过程中产生不同污染物的途径、空间、时效与程度均有差别,进而在探究沿江经济与环境联动关系时会产生区域差异性,因此各地区EKC形态存在多样化形式。基于长江沿线45个城市2003~2018年的面板数据,从大气、水、声、土壤及生物5个层次选取单一环境指标,并构建综合环境指标,根据环境指标特性设定传统EKC以及考虑空间溢出效应的SDM模型,在对比单一与综合环境指标EKC曲线基础上,通过界定流域范围、划分经济发展水平对长江沿线城市进行分类,研究沿江城市经济增长与环境质量的内在联动关系。结果表明:(1)单一环境指标衡量环境质量存在局限性、不稳定性,以人均工业二氧化硫排放量、人均工业废水排放量和城市道路噪声为环境质量指标时,经济增加与环境质量呈“U”型曲线,而采用综合环境指标时,两者呈倒“U”型。同时各指标表现出不同程度的空间溢出效应,其中溢出效应最显著的为工业废水;(2)长江沿线城市环境治理缺乏全局性,治理范围有待拓展。近年来在工业二氧化硫、工业废水方面减排效果显著,但建成区绿化覆盖率以及工业固体废物综合利用率在现阶段呈缓慢下降的趋势;(3)由于样本的异质性使得综合环境指标与经济联动关系,呈现多种形态,其中上游地区为倒“U”型,中游和高收入地区为正“U”型,下游地区为“W”型,低收入地区为“M”型。通过研究发现下游地区环境问题较为突出亟需整治,低收入地区要做到防患于未然,采取主动治理、提前控制。

Abstract: Due to the regional resource endowment differences along the Yangtze River, uneven distribution of industries, large income gap and so on. This leads to the differences in the path, space, time and degree of different pollutants in the production process of different regions along the Yangtze River. Then, regional differences will occur when exploring the linkage between the economy and environment along the river, so there are various forms of EKC in different regions. Based on the panel data of 45 cities along the Yangtze River from 2003 to 2018, this paper selects five single environmental indexes from the five environmental levels (atmosphere, water, sound, soil and biology), and constructs a comprehensive environmental index. The traditional EKC and SDM models are set according to the characteristics of environmental indicators .Relying on the comparison of single and comprehensive environmental index EKC curve, this paper classifies the cities along the river by defining the scope of the basin and dividing the level of economic development, and studies the internal linkage between economic growth and environmental quality. The results show that: (1) There are limitation and instability in measuring environmental quality by single environmental index. When the per capita industrial sulfur dioxide emission, per capita industrial waste water emission and urban road noise are taken as the environmental quality indicators, the economic growth and environmental quality present a "U" curve. However, when comprehensive environmental indicators are used, they are inverted "U" type. At the same time, each index shows different degrees of spatial spillover effect, and the most significant spillover effect is industrial wastewater. (2) The environmental governance of cities along the Yangtze River lacks the overall situation, and the scope of governance needs to be expanded. In recent years, the emission reduction effect of industrial sulfur dioxide and industrial wastewater is remarkable, but the green coverage rate of the built-up area and the comprehensive utilization rate of industrial solid waste show a slow downward trend at this stage. (3) Due to the heterogeneity of samples, the linkage relationship between comprehensive environmental indicators and economy presents a variety of forms: the upstream area is inverted “U” type; the middle and high-income area is positive “U” type; the downstream area is “W” type; low-income areas are of the “M” type. It is found that the environmental problems in the downstream areas are more prominent and need to be rectified, and the low-income areas should take preventive measures, take active measures and control ahead of time.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 赵璊璊, 冯 莉, 郭 松, 田慧慧. 景观格局影响下的南京市热舒适度动态变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1712 .
[2] 杨佳, 葛馨, 吴起鑫. 贵阳市主城区空气质量指数时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1827 .
[3] 吴浪, 周廷刚, 温莉, 刘晓璐, 朱晓波. 基于遥感数据的PM2.5与城市化的时空关系研究——以成渝城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2142 -2152 .
[4] 代培, 阎明军, 周游, 周彦锋, 熊满晖, 卢剑达, 刘凯.  

太湖五里湖沿岸带浮游植物群落生态特征(2014~2015) [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2348 -2357 .

[5] 苏 芳, 郑亚萍, 阚立娜, 蔡 莎. 基于CVM调查法评估城市公共绿地服务价值 ——以西部省会城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2434 -2442 .
[6] 胡兴坤, 高 雷, 杨 浩, 刘绍平, 陈大庆, 段辛斌 . 长江中游黄石江段鱼类早期资源现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 60 -67 .
[7] 胡晓, 余英俊, 魏永才, 洪亮, 张永年, 石小涛, 吴睿. 基于过鱼效果评估的涵洞鱼道堰式挡板性能研究与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 134 -143 .
[8] 秦立, 付宇文, 吴起鑫, 安艳玲, 刘瑞禄, 吕婕梅, 吴振宇. 赤水河流域土地利用结构对氮素输出的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 175 -183 .
[9] 陈 炳, 曾 刚, 曹贤忠, 宓泽锋. 长三角城市群生态文明建设与城市化耦合协调发展研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 530 -541 .
[10] 刘 菊, 傅 斌, 张成虎, 胡治鹏, 王玉宽. 基于InVEST模型的岷江上游生态系统水源涵养量与价值评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 577 -585 .