长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (7): 1494-1502.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202207007

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

九龙江流域土壤稀土元素分布特征及控制因素

张  倩1, 韩贵琳2*   

  1. (1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101;2.中国地质大学(北京),北京 100083)
  • 出版日期:2022-07-20 发布日期:2022-08-22

Distribution and Controlling Factors of Soil Rare Earth Elements in Jiulongjiang River Catchment

ZHANG Qian1,HAH Gui-lin2   

  1. (1.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;2.Institute of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)
  • Online:2022-07-20 Published:2022-08-22

摘要: 摘  要:选取九龙江流域3种土壤(红壤、黄壤和赤红壤)的剖面为研究对象,研究稀土元素分布特征及垂向变化规律,并探讨其控制因素。结果显示,红壤和赤红壤剖面稀土元素总量(ΣREEs)在不同深度的顺序为:淋溶层<淀积层<半风化层,这与成土过程中发生的淋溶作用密切相关;黄壤剖面的淋溶层和淀积层的ΣREEs含量明显高于半风化层,主要与浅层土壤的农业活动有关。稀土元素配分模式显示,土壤剖面中Eu都均表现为明显负异常,源于母岩Eu负异常的继承和土壤氧化还原环境的变化,而黄壤、赤红壤剖面Ce表现为正异常,则可能由于风化成土过程的差异造成。九龙江流域土壤稀土元素的初始含量主要由成土母质决定,土壤矿物成分以及理化性质影响了土壤稀土元素的迁移和分异。土壤中含氧化物矿物组成多,粘粒含量高,有机质含量高,都有利于稀土元素的富集。

Abstract: Three soil profiles (yellow soil, red loam and red soil) from Jiulongjiang river catchment were selected to research. The results showed that the total rare earth elements (ΣREEs) of red soil and red loam were in the following order of different depths: leaching layer<sedimentary layer<semi-weathered layer, and the enrichment of REEs in semi-weathered layer was closely related to the leaching during pedogenesis. ΣREEs in leaching and sedimentary layers of yellow soil profile was significantly higher than that of the semi-weathered layer, which may be related to agricultural activities in shallow soil. The shale-normalized REEs pattern displayed obvious negative anomalies of Eu in all soil profiles, which may attribute to the inheritance of negative Eu anomalies in parent rock and the change of soil redox environment. Positive Ce anomalies in yellow soil and red soil profiles may be caused by the difference during weathering process. Initial soil REEs concentration in Jiulong river catchment is mainly determined by soil parent material, and soil mineral composition and physical/chemical properties affected the migration and fractionation of soil REEs. The higher composition of oxide minerals, higher clay content and organic matter content in soil are more conducive to the enrichment of REEs.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 罗友进, 韩国辉, 余端, 李燕, 廖敦秀, 谢永红, 魏朝富. 三峡库区土壤重金属污染评价及其来源[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1800 .
[2] 吕浩 田辉伍 申绍祎 段辛斌 刘绍平. 岷江下游产漂流性卵鱼类早期资源现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 冯凡, 赵中华, 陈晨, 田园, 郦倩玉, 龚雄虎, 叶晨昊. 铜绿微囊藻对有机毒物菲的生理生态响应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2031 -2041 .
[4] 魏建瑛 徐建英 樊斐斐. 卧龙自然保护区植被覆盖度变化及其对地形因子的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[5] 张映雪, 王瑞, 屈霄, 夏文彤, 辛未, 郭传波, 陈宇顺.  

不同鱼类养殖方式对长江中游湖泊浮游植物群落的影响及其季节动态 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2260 -2269 .

[6] 周晟吕, 李月寒, 胡 静, 封竞男. 基于问卷调查的上海市大气环境质量改善的支付意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2419 -2424 .
[7] 屈小娥. 中国生态效率的区域差异及影响因素——基于时空差异视角的实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2673 -2683 .
[8] 舒旺, 王鹏, 肖汉玉, 刘君政, 赵君, 余小芳. 鄱阳湖流域乐安河水化学特征及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 681 -690 .
[9] 张亚飞, 廖和平, 李义龙, . 基于反规划与FLUS模型的城市增长边界划定研究——以重庆市渝北区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(04): 757 -767 .
[10] 俞雅文, 徐东坡. 运用碳氮稳定同位素技术探究中华绒螯蟹与无齿螳臂相手蟹的营养生态位特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(09): 2092 -2099 .