长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (5): 1068-1079.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202305016

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

灌浆结实期气象条件对江汉平原优质稻产量及品质的影响

党程成1,郝蓉蓉1 ,周梦1, 胡玉婷1, 刘越1 ,杨青青1 ,周继永3 ,田小海1,2*
  

  1. (1.长江大学农学院,湖北 荆州 434025;2.长江大学/主要粮食作物产业化湖北省协同创新中心,湖北 荆州 434025;3.武穴市现代农业示范中心,湖北 武穴 435400)
  • 出版日期:2023-05-20 发布日期:2023-05-19

Effects of Meteorological Conditions During Grain Filling Stage on  Grain Yield and Rice Quality of High-quality Rice in Jianghan Plain#br#

DANG Cheng-cheng1, HAO Rong-rong1, ZHOU Meng1, HU Yu-ting1,  LIU Yue1, YANG Qing-qing1, ZHOU Ji-yong3, TIAN Xiao-hai1,2   

  1. (1. College of Agronomy, Yangtze River University, Jingzhou 434025, China; 2. Yangtze University/Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Industrialization of Major Grain Crops, Jingzhou 434025, China; 3. Modern agriculture demonstration center of Wuxue City , Hubei Province, Wuxue 435400, China)
  • Online:2023-05-20 Published:2023-05-19

摘要: 水稻灌浆结实期气象条件同时影响优质稻产量与品质,因此在生产上调整合适的播种日期对优质稻生产至关重要。以10个优质稻品种为材料,在江汉平原腹地的湖北荆州通过分期播种(C1、C2、C3),使其在灌浆结实期经历不同的气象条件,并比较了不同播期下产量和主要品质指标的变化,及其与气象因子之间的关系。结果表明,灌浆期的前15 d气象条件显著影响优质稻产量和品质。从总体上看,产量以第2播期-C2(8.3 t/hm2)最高,C2处理具有更高的地上部干物质积累量、穗粒数和结实率;品质指标中,整精米率以播期C2和C3较优,分别为62.1%、和61.8%;垩白度在3个播期间差异不大;大多数品种的直链淀粉含量则随播期延迟而显著升高。籽粒产量和稻米品质与灌浆期关键气象因子关系密切,产量与灌浆期前15 d各气象因子均显著相关;千粒重与灌浆期各气象因子均呈直线相关,其中与气温日较差、日照时数呈正相关,与相对湿度呈负相关;整精米率与灌浆期各气象因子之间均为开口向下的“抛物线型”关系;因此,经过筛选得到灌浆期的前15 d期间的日均温26℃左右、日较差9℃、相对湿度85%、日照时数6 h左右是实现优质稻产量和品质双提升的最佳气象条件。可见,江汉平原地区优质稻的种植存在最佳栽培期(灌浆期),而合理安排播种日期应成为优质稻生产上的一项关键技术。

Abstract: The meteorological conditions of grain filling stage affect the grain yield and quality of high-quality rice, so it is very important to adjust the appropriate sowing date (grain filling period) for high-quality rice production. In this study, 10 high quality rice varieties with three sowing dates (C1, C2, C3) in Jingzhou, Hubei Province. The changes of grain yield and rice quality under different sowing dates and their relationship with meteorological factors were compared. The results show that, the meteorological conditions significantly affected the grian yield and quality of high-quality rice with in the first15 days of the grain filling period (FFD). On the whole, the yield was the highest in the second sowing date-C2 (8.3 t/hm2), and C2 treatment had higher aboveground dry matter accumulation, grain number per panicle and seed setting rate; among the rice quality indexes, head rice rate was better in C2 and C3, which were 62.1% and 61.8%, respectively; chalkiness had little difference among the three sowing periods; the amylose content of most varieties increased significantly with the delay of sowing date. The grain yield and rice quality were closely related to the key meteorological factors during the grian filling stage, and the yield was significantly correlated with the meteorological factors in the first 15 days of the grian filling stage, and the 1000-grain weight was linearly correlated with the meteorological factors during the grian filling period. among them, it was positively correlated with the daily temperature range and sunshine hours, but negatively correlated with relative humidity, and the relationship between head milled rice rate and meteorological factors during the grian filling period is a “parabola” with the opening downward. Therefore , it was found that the daily average temperature of about 26℃, daily range of 9℃, relative humidity of 85% and sunshine hours of about 6 hours during the first 15 days of grian filling period were the best meteorological conditions to improve the grain yield and quality of high-quality rice. Therefore, there is an obvious optimal cultivation period (grain-filling period) for the cultivation of high-quality rice in Jianghan Plain, and reasonable arrangement of sowing date should be a key technology in the production of high-quality rice.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .
[2] 滕家喜, 周志翔, 李晨, 胡兴宜, 孙启祥. 石首市抑螺防病林空间布局优化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1430 .
[3] 孙惠惠, 章新平, 罗紫东, 尚程鹏, 贺新光, 饶志国.  近53 a来长江流域极端降水指数特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1879 .
[4] 付书科, 李小帆, 彭甲超, 张子悦, 陈 思. 基于动态因子分析法的长江三角洲城市群城镇化质量测度研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1909 -1918 .
[5] 张玉韩 吴尚昆 董延涛. 长江经济带矿产资源开发空间格局优化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[7] 文高辉 杨钢桥. 耕地细碎化对农地整治农户土地权属调整意愿的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[8] 查凯丽, 刘艳芳, 孔雪松, 田雅丝, 刘耀林, . 村镇路网通达性与空间出行研究——以武汉市李集镇为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2663 -2672 .
[9] 张继 周旭 蒋啸 杨江州 牛潜. 生态工程建设背景下贵州高原的植被变化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[10] 邢璐平, 方斌, 向梦杰, . 基于GWR模型的江苏省耕地集约利用水平时空变化特征及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 376 -386 .