长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (6): 1291-1304.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202306016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

丹江口库区2001~2020年植被生态系统质量遥感监测与时空演变分析

路利杰1,2,王立辉1*,李扬3,赵鹏程1,2,杨启池1,2,冯奇1,肖飞1,杜耘1,凌峰1
  

  1. (1.中国科学院精密测量科学与技术创新研究院,环境与灾害监测评估湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430077;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;3. 湖北省生态环境科学研究院(省生态环境工程评估中心),湖北 武汉 430072)
  • 出版日期:2023-06-20 发布日期:2023-06-21

Remote Sensing Monitoring and Spatial Temporal Pattern Evolution Analysis of the Vegetation Ecosystem Quality in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Area from 2001 to 2020 

LU Li-jie1,2, WANG Li-hui1, LI Yang3, ZHAO Peng-cheng1,2,YANG Qi-chi1,2, FENG Qi 1, XIAO Fei1, DU Yun1, LING Feng1   

  1. (1.Key Laboratory for Environment and Disaster Monitoring and Evaluation of Hubei, Innovation Academy for Precision 
    Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430077, China; 2. University of Chinese 
    Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Hubei Provincial Academy of Eco-environmental Sciences (Hubei Provincial 
    Eco-Environmental Engineering Assessment Center), Wuhan 430072, China)
  • Online:2023-06-20 Published:2023-06-21

摘要: 丹江口库区是我国南水北调中线工程的核心水源地,良好的生态系统质量是保证水库安全运行和“一泓清水”永续北送的前提。以丹江口库区为研究区,在获取高精度精细生态系统类型数据基础上,基于植被覆盖度FVC(Fractional Vegetation Cover)、叶面积指数LAI(Leaf Area Index)和总初级生产力GPP(Gross Primary Productivity)等生态系统遥感参量构建生态系统质量评估模型,对库区2001~2020年植被生态系统质量进行遥感监测,分析其时空格局演变。研究结果表明:(1)丹江口库区2001和2020年植被生态系统质量指数分别为56.16和78.32。2001~2020年,库区植被生态系统质量逐渐变好,质量指数增加15以上的区域占总面积的81.32%;(2)各县(市、区)生态系统质量有所差异,淅川县和丹江口市生态系统质量指数在2001和2020年均低于库区平均水平,但增量较高,分别增加25.55和23.99;(3)不同生态系统类型中,森林生态系统质量指数最高,但增量较低;(4)2001~2020年,生态系统质量指数随坡度增加而增加,其中0°~3°区域,指数增量最大,3°~15°区域,指数增量随着坡度的增加而增大,15°以上区域,指数增量随坡度的增加逐渐减小。除0°~3°之外,8°~15°区域生态系统质量指数增量最大;(5)植被生态系统质量与降水的偏相关系数绝对值略高于与气温的偏相关系数绝对值,表明生态系统质量受降水的影响比受气温的影响更显著。研究结果可为丹江口库区生态系统管理和保护、生态规划制定提供重要数据支撑,对保障库区生态安全、实现区域生态系统可持续发展具有重要意义。

Abstract: Danjiangkou Reservoir is the core water source of China’s South-to-North Water Diversion Project, and the quality of the reservoir’s ecosystem is a prerequisite to ensure the safe operation of the reservoir and the sustainable northward transmission of “a flood of clear water”. In this paper, by obtaining high-precision and fine-grained ecosystem type of Danjiangkou reservoir area, we construct a remote sensing assessment model of vegetation ecosystem quality based on the ecological parameters such as Fractional Vegetation Cover (FVC), Leaf Area Index (LAI) and Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) to evaluate the vegetation ecosystem quality and analyze its spatial and temporal dynamic changes from 2001 to 2020. The results show that (1) From 2001 to 2020, the vegetation ecosystem quality in the Danjiangkou reservoir area showed a significant upward trend, and the EQI(Ecosystem Quality Indices) in 2001 and 2020 are 56.16 and 78.32, respectively. The increment of vegetation ecosystem quality is higher than 15 in 81.32% of the total area. (2) Ecosystem quality varies among counties (cities and districts); the ecosystem quality index of Xichuan County and Danjiangkou City is lower than the average level of the reservoir area in 2001 and 2020, but the ecosystem quality index has the highest increment, increasing by 25.55 and 23.99, respectively. (3) Among the different ecosystem types, the forest ecosystem quality index is the highest, but the increment is lower. (4) From 2001 to 2020, the ecosystem quality index has a positive correlation with the increase of slope and the increase of ecosystem quality index was the largest in the areas of 0°-3°. When the slope became steeper, the increment of vegetation ecosystem quality raises with increase of slope grade on slopes between 3°-15° and reached the top at slope 8°-15°, afterwards, dropped down. (5) The absolute value of the bias correlation coefficient between ecosystem quality index and precipitation was significantly higher than that between temperature and ecosystem quality index, revealing that the ecosystem quality index was more significantly influenced by precipitation than by temperature. The research results can provide data support for ecological protection policy formulation, ecological protection spatial control and decision making in the Danjiangkou reservoir area, and are of great significance for ecological security and water source protection in the reservoir area.


No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .
[2] 钟业喜, 傅 钰, 朱治州, 王晓静.  基于母子企业联系的上市公司网络结构研究——以长江中游城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1725 .
[3] 孙惠惠, 章新平, 罗紫东, 尚程鹏, 贺新光, 饶志国.  近53 a来长江流域极端降水指数特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1879 .
[4] 王 磊, 李成丽.  

我国中部地区城市群多中心结构的增长效应 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2231 -2240 .

[5] 方琳, 吴凤平, 王新华, 余燕团.  

基于共同前沿SBM模型的农业用水效率测度及改善潜力 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2293 -2304 .

[6] 童小容, 杨庆媛, 毕国华, . 重庆市2000~2015年土地利用变化时空特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2481 -2495 .
[7] 康婷婷, 徐 欢, 张春华, 胡召玲. 区域尺度农田最大光能利用率参数估算及时空变化分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2766 -2774 .
[8] 吕乐婷, 王晓蕊, 孙才志, 张 杰. 基于SWAT模型的细河流域蓝水绿水资源量时空分布研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 39 -47 .
[9] 程谅, 郭忠录, 秦嘉惠. 长期施肥对小麦—玉米轮作红壤抗蚀性的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 212 -221 .
[10] 李艳, 马百胜, 杨宣. 两类ENSO事件对中国东部地区极端降水的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 469 -482 .