长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (11): 2326-2337.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202311008

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江中游城市群旅游生态效率空间网络结构演变及其效应

黄冬春,王兆峰*   

  1. (湖南师范大学旅游学院,湖南 长沙 410081)
  • 出版日期:2023-11-20 发布日期:2023-11-28

Evolution of Spatial Network Structure of Tourism Eco-efficiency and Its Effect of Urban Agglomeration in  Middle Reaches of Yangtze River

HUANG Dong-chun, WANG Zhao-feng   

  1. (Tourism College of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)
  • Online:2023-11-20 Published:2023-11-28

摘要: 将DEA窗口分析法与超效率SBM模型结合,测度分析2011~2020年长江中游城市群旅游生态效率动态变化,利用修正引力模型和社会网络分析方法研究旅游生态效率空间网络结构演变,最后采用面板数据回归模型分析其网络效应。研究结果表明:(1)研究期间长江中游城市群旅游生态效率整体均值为0.719,总体呈波动下降趋势,区域差异显著。(2)整体网络密度和网络关系数分别波动上升至0.1627和123,网络等级度和网络效率虽有小幅下降,但基本稳定在0.2和0.8左右,可见城市群旅游生态效率关联网络结构松散,具有一定层级特征,且溢出渠道不畅。(3)武汉、长沙、南昌、孝感和宜春等城市的各项个体指标始终大于均值,在旅游生态效率关联网络中占据处于中心地位;常德、益阳、黄冈、宜昌、襄阳等城市各项个体指标始终低于均值且排名相对滞后,在网络中处于边缘位置。(4)整体网络密度提升、网络等级度和网络效率降低有利于城市群整体旅游生态效率的提升,缩小区域差异;同时,个体网络中心性指标的上升对城市旅游生态效率具有显著促进作用。

Abstract: The dynamic change of tourism eco-efficiency of urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of Yangtze River from 2011 to 2020 was measured and analyzed by combining DEA window analysis method with super-efficiency SBM model. The modified gravity model and social network analysis method were used to explore the evolution of spatial network structure of tourism eco-efficiency in urban agglomeration, and the panel data regression model was constructed to analyze its network effects. The results showed that: (1) The overall mean value of tourism eco-efficiency was 0.719, which showed a downward trend in fluctuation with significant regional differences. (2) The fluctuation of the overall network density and the number of network relations increased to 0.162 7 and 123, and the network level and network efficiency decreased slightly but basically stabilized at 0.2 and 0.8. It that the correlation network structure of tourism eco-efficiency in urban agglomeration  loose, with certain hierarchical characteristics, and the overflow channel was not smooth, which needed to be further optimized. (3) The individual indexes of Wuhan, Changsha, Nanchang, Xiaogan and Yichun were always higher than the mean value, which occupcentral position in the correlation network of tourism eco-efficiency. The individual indicators of Changde, Yiyang, Huanggang, Yichang, Xiangyang and other cities were always lower than the mean value and relatively lag behind, at the edge of the network. (4) The increase of overall network density, the decrease of network level and network efficiency could significantly improve the overall tourism eco-efficiency of urban agglomerations and narrow the regional differences. The improvement of individual network centrality index had a significant promoting effect on urban tourism eco-efficiency.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庄汝龙, 宓科娜, 梁龙武. 中国工业废水排放格局及其驱动因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1765 .
[2] 崔鑫 靳文佳 王永杰 周立旻 郑祥民. 上海市公园湖泊表层沉积物中汞的特征及其污染评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 吴浪, 周廷刚, 温莉, 刘晓璐, 朱晓波. 基于遥感数据的PM2.5与城市化的时空关系研究——以成渝城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2142 -2152 .
[4] 唐恩斌, 张梅青.  

高铁背景下城市铁路可达性与空间相互作用格局——以江西省为例 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2241 -2249 .

[5] 顾铮鸣, 金晓斌, 沈春竹, 金志丰, 周寅康. 近15a江苏省水源涵养功能时空变化与影响因素探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2453 -2462 .
[6] 王刚毅, 刘 杰. 基于改进水生态足迹的水资源环境与经济发展协调性评价——以中原城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 80 -90 .
[7] 秦立, 付宇文, 吴起鑫, 安艳玲, 刘瑞禄, 吕婕梅, 吴振宇. 赤水河流域土地利用结构对氮素输出的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 175 -183 .
[8] 陈国磊, 田玲玲, 罗静, 蒋亮, 吴益坤, . 长江经济带城市黑臭水体空间分布格局及影响因子[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1003 -1014 .
[9] 窦小东, 黄玮, 易琦, 李蒙, 李忠良. LUCC及气候变化对李仙江流域径流的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(06): 1481 -1490 .
[10] 高庆九, 尤琦 . 我国江南夏季极端高温季节内变化特征初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(07): 1682 -1690 .