长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (06): 1481-1490.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201906022

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

LUCC及气候变化对李仙江流域径流的影响

窦小东1,黄玮2*,易琦3,李蒙2,李忠良4   

  1. (1. 云南省气象服务中心,云南 昆明 650034;2. 云南省气候中心,云南 昆明 650034;3. 云南大学资源环境与
    地球科学学院,云南 昆明 650504;4. 南京信息工程大学遥感与测绘工程学院,江苏 南京 210044)
  • 出版日期:2019-06-20 发布日期:2019-06-20

Effects of LUCC and Climate Change on the Runoff in Lixian River Basin

DOU Xiao-dong1, HUANG Wei2, YI Qi3, LI Meng2, LI Zhong-liang4   

  1. (1. Yunnan Meteorological Service Center, Kunming 650034, China; 2. Yunnan Provincial Climate Center, Kunming 650034, China; 3. School of Resource Environment and Earth Science in Yunnan University, kunming 650504, China; 4. School of Remote Sensing & Geomatics Engineering in Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)
  • Online:2019-06-20 Published:2019-06-20

摘要: 为揭示李仙江流域LUCC和气候变化对径流变化的影响,基于SWAT模型,通过设置不同情景,定量分析了不同土地利用类型和气候要素对流域内径流的影响,并结合RCP4.5、RCP8.5两种气候情景对流域未来径流的变化进行了预估。结果显示:(1) SWAT模型在李仙江流域径流模拟中具有很好的适用性,可以用SWAT模型进行流域的径流模拟,率定期的模型参数R2、Ens分别达到0.74、0.73,验证期的模型参数R2、Ens分别达到0.63、0.63;(2) 单一土地利用情景显示,将农业用地转化为林地或草地,均会导致流域径流量的减少,而将林地转化为草地则会引起流域径流量的增加,农业用地、林地、草地三者对径流增加贡献顺序为农业用地>草地>林地。(3) 2006~2015年间李仙江流域的LUCC引起的月均径流增加幅度小于气候变化引起的月均径流减少幅度,李仙江径流的变化由气候变化主导。(4) 在RCP4.5和RCP8.5两种气候情景下,2021~2050年间李仙江流域径流均呈减少趋势,减少的速率分别为3.6和2.15亿m3/10 a,这与1971~2015年间,流域实测径流减速为6.7亿m3/10 a的变化趋势一致,但这两种情景下,径流的减少趋势有所降低,分别为1971~2015年减速的53.7%、32.1%。


Abstract: Based on SWAT model and quantitatively analyses, the impact of different land use types and climatic factors on watershed runoff in different scenarios were studied to reveal the influence of LUCC and climate change on watershed runoff variation. Combined with RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 climate scenarios, the upcoming runoff change of the Lixian River Basin was predicted. Results were as follows: (1) SWAT model performs well in simulating Lixian River basin runoff. The model parameters R2 and Ens were 0.74 and 0.73 respectively in parameter calibration period, and 0.63 and 0.63 respectively in model verification period. (2) The single land use scenario shows that the conversion of farmland into woodland or grassland will decrease watershed runoff, however, the conversion of forest to pasture will increase watershed runoff. The three types of land contributed to the rise of runoff in the order from the largest to the smallest, followed by cultivated land, grassland and forest land. (3) the average monthly runoff increase caused by LUCC was lower than the average monthly runoff reduction caused by climate change in the Lixian River Basin during 2006-2015. (4) Under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 climatic scenarios, the runoff in the Lixian River basin shows a decreasing trend during the period of 2021 to 2050, with decreasing rates of 3.6 ×108 m3/10a and 2.15 ×108 m3/10a respectively. This is consistent with the trend of deceleration of the measured runoff of 6.7×108 m3/10a in the Lixian River basin between 1971 and 2015. However, under these two scenarios, the trend of runoff reduction has been some extent decreased, reaching 53.7% and 32.1% respectively for the 1971-2015 deceleration.


No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 解晓南,许朋柱,秦伯强. 太湖流域苏锡常地区地面沉降若干问题探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 125 -131 .
[2] 张文广,胡远满, 刘 淼,杨兆平,常 禹,李秀珍,杨 孟,问青春, . 基于土地利用变化的生态服务价值损益估算——以岷江上游地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 821 .
[3] 陈永柏, 邓 云| 梁瑞峰. 溪洛渡水电站叠梁门取水方式减缓下泄低温水的优化调度[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 340 .
[4] 刘春霞, 李月臣, 杨华. 三峡库区(重庆段)石漠化敏感性评价及空间分异特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(3): 291 .
[5] 陈文静| 张燕萍| 赵春来| 王昌来. 近年长江湖口江段鱼类群落组成及多样性[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(06): 684 .
[6] 郝 莹 |鲁 俊 |温华洋 |郑媛媛 |卢燕宇. 安徽省近49年短历时强降水事件趋势变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(9): 1143 .
[7] 曹志宏 |陈志超 |郝晋珉. 中国城乡居民食品消费变化趋势分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(10): 1173 .
[8] 张 群|张 雯|李飞雪,张 琳|杨云丽|李满春. 基于信息熵和数据包络分析的区域土地利用结构评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(8): 1149 .
[9] 吴启侠,杨威,朱建强,王曾桢,叶浩. 杂交水稻对淹水胁迫的响应及排水指标研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(06): 875 .
[10] 张大文,罗林广,张莉,魏益华,唐利锋,陈云霞. 鄱阳湖表层沉积物中砷及重金属赋存形态及其潜在生态风险[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(08): 1132 .