长江流域资源与环境 >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (7): 1412-1423.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202407004

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

淮河生态经济带乡村产业振兴水平评价及障碍因素研究

黄敦平1,叶岩松1,姚旭敏1,刘璇2   

  1. (1.安徽财经大学经济学院,安徽 蚌埠 233030;2.武汉铁路职业技术学院, 湖北 武汉 430205)
  • 出版日期:2024-07-20 发布日期:2024-07-18

Evaluation and Obstacle Factors of Rural Industrial Revitalization Level in Huaihe River Ecological Economic Belt

HUANG Dun-ping1, YE Yan-song1, YAO Xu-min1,LIU Xuan2   

  1. 1.School of Economics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030,China;2.  Wuhan Railway Vocational College of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China)
  • Online:2024-07-20 Published:2024-07-18

摘要: 产业振兴是乡村全面振兴的基础和关键。从农产品产业体系振兴、农业多功能产业体系振兴以及农业支撑产业体系振兴3个维度构建乡村产业振兴评价指标体系,采用熵权TOPSIS模型测度2013~2022年淮河生态经济带25个地市乡村产业振兴水平,运用障碍度模型诊断地区乡村产业振兴障碍因子。研究表明:2013~2022年,淮河生态经济带乡村产业振兴整体水平相对不高,综合得分位于0.2~0.4区间波动,但呈现上升态势。淮河生态经济带上、中、下游三大区域之间乡村产业振兴水平存在较强的空间差异与维度差异,空间上呈现“两头高中间低”的凹型分布特征。三大维度中,农产品产业体系振兴与农业多功能产业体系振兴综合得分均值相对较高,但农业支撑产业体系振兴综合得分均值较低。进一步采用障碍度模型诊断得出乡村数字基础设施建设不完善、农村能源投入与支撑能力不强以及新型业态培育不足是制约淮河生态经济带乡村产业振兴的主要因素。从加强沿淮城市跨区域协同、推进乡村数字基础设施建设、推动农村能源革命及培育发展乡村新产业新业态等方面提出对策建议。

Abstract: Industrial revitalization is the foundation and key to achieve a comprehensive rural revitalization. The evaluation index system of rural industry revitalization was constructed from three dimensions: revitalization of agricultural product industry system, revitalization of multi-functional agricultural industry system and revitalization of agricultural support industry system. The entropy weight TOPSIS method was used to measure the level of rural industry revitalization in 25 prefecture-level cities in the Huaihe River Ecological Economic Belt (HREEB) from 2013-2022. The obstacle degree model was used to diagnose the obstacle factors of rural industry revitalization of the region. The study showed that, the level of rural industrial revitalization in the HREEB was relatively low. The comprehensive score fluctuated in the range of 0.2~0.4, showing an upward trend. There were strong spatial and dimensional differences in the revitalization level of rural industries among the three major regions of the HREEB , with a concave distribution characteristic of "high at both ends and low in the middle". Among the three dimensions, the revitalization of agricultural products industry system and the revitalization of multi-functional agricultural industry system had relatively high comprehensive scores, but the revitalization of agricultural support industry system had lower comprehensive scores. Further diagnosis of the obstacle model concluded that the imperfect construction of rural digital infrastructure, weak rural energy input and support capacity, and insufficient cultivation of new types of business were the main factors restricting the revitalization of rural industries in the HREEB. Countermeasures were proposed in terms of strengthening cross-regional synergy among cities along the Huaihe River, promoting rural digital infrastructure construction, strengthening rural energy revolution, and fostering the development of new industries and new business forms in the countryside.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[2] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[3] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[4] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[5] 张大鹏, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 岳洋, 任亚文. 上海大都市区物流企业区位分布特征及其演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[6] 佘颖, 刘耀彬. 国内外绿色发展制度演化的历史脉络及启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1370 .
[7] 侯雯嘉, 陈长青, 乔辉, 孙新素, 周曙东. 1980~2009年长江下游地区油菜冻害时空特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .
[8] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .
[9] 伍文琪, 罗贤, 黄玮。李运刚. 云南省水资源承载力评价与时空分布特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1385 .
[10] 王辉, 延军平, 王鹏涛, 武亚群. 多民族地区经济差异的空间格局演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1390 .