长江流域资源与环境 >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (10): 2204-2218.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202410011

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

青藏高原未来土地利用变化与景观生态风险多情景预测

于目良1,刘悦俊1,张燕杰1,2*   

  1. (1.大理大学农学与生物科学学院,云南 大理671003;2.苍山洱海一体化保护与流域绿色发展云南省高校协同创新中心,大理大学,云南 大理 671003)
  • 出版日期:2024-10-20 发布日期:2024-11-07

Multi-scenario Prediction of Future Land Use Change and Landscape Ecological Risk on the Qingzang Plateau

YU Mu-liang1, LIU Yue-jun1, ZHANG Yan-jie1,2   

  1. (1. College of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Dali University, Dali 671003, China; 2. Co-Innovation Center for Cangshan Mountain and Erhai Lake Integrated Protect and Green Development of Yunnan Province, Dali University, Dali 671003, China )
  • Online:2024-10-20 Published:2024-11-07

摘要: 土地利用变化与景观生态风险评价对区域生态保护及规划管理具有重要意义。以青藏高原为例,基于斑块生成土地利用变化模拟模型(Patch-generating Land Use Simulation,PLUS),对土地利用驱动因素进行分析,构建2030~2050年惯性发展、经济建设、生态保护3种未来情景,模拟各情景下土地利用及景观生态风险变化。结果表明:(1)青藏高原近10 a土地转化模式主要是草地和未利用地的转化。草地和林地与草地和未利用地之间的转化具有倾向性,未利用地、草地和林地土地利用变化因素中DEM(Digital Elevation Model)、DEM和年平均气温贡献度最高。(2)2030~2050年3种情景下,不同情景下区域土地利用变化具有差异性,惯性发展情景下,水域和建设用地扩张明显,面积为1 627 、10 km2;生态保护情景下,林地和草地增加,面积为232 、15143 km2;经济建设情景下,林地和草地减少,面积为224 、7 653 km2,耕地、建设用地增加,面积为146 、24 km2。青藏高原的保护政策不同区域应该结合实际情况制定。(3)青藏高原景观生态风险呈西北高东南低的空间分布特征,以较低风险区为主。惯性发展情景下,2030~2050年生态风险呈现出先下降后上升的趋势;经济建设情景下,2030~2050年生态风险明显提高,其中较高风险区增加最多,面积为56 051 km2;生态保护情景下,2030~2050年生态风险明显降低,其中较低风险增加最多,面积为16 136 km2。研究成果可为青藏高原生态保护与治理提供决策参考。

Abstract: The changes in land use and the assessment of landscape ecological risk are of significant importance for regional ecological conservation and planning management. This study took the Qingzang Plateau as an example and employed the Patch-generating Land Use Simulation model (PLUS) to analyze the driving factors of land use changes. Three future scenarios, namely inertial development, economic expansion, and ecological protection, for the period of 2030 to 2050 were constructed. These scenarios were used to simulate changes in land use and landscape ecological risk under each scenario. Results indicated that: (1) Over the past decade, the primary land use conversion pattern on the Qingzang Plateau involved the transformation of grassland and unused land. There was a tendency for conversion between grassland and forest, as well as between grassland and unused land. Factors contributing significantly to land use changes in unused land, grassland, and forest included DEM (Digital Elevation Model) and annual average temperature.  (2) Between 2030 and 2050, different regional land use changes may vary significantly across the three scenarios. Under the inertia development scenario, there is a noticeable expansion of water bodies and construction land, with areas of 1 627 km2and 10 km2, respectively. In the ecological protection scenario, forest and grassland may increase, covering areas of 232 km2 and 15 143 km2, respectively. In the economic development scenario, forest and grassland may decrease, covering areas of 224 km2 and 7 653 km2, while arable land and construction land is likely to increase, covering 146 km2and 24 km2.Therefore, protection policies for the Qingzang Plateau should be region-specific and tailored to the actual circumstances. (3) The landscape ecological risk on the Qingzang Plateau was found to exhibit a spatial distribution pattern with higher risk in the northwest and lower risk in the southeast, primarily in areas of lower risk. Under the inertial development scenario, ecological risk between 2030 and 2050 exhibit a trend of first decreasing and then increasing. In the economic expansion scenario, ecological risk may significantly increase between 2030 and 2050, with the highest-risk areas experiencing the most significant increase, covering an area of 56 051 km2. Conversely, in the ecological protection scenario, ecological risk substantially may decrease between 2030 and 2050, with lower-risk areas experiencing the most substantial increase, covering an area of 16 136 km2.These findings can serve as a decision reference for ecological protection and governance on the Qingzang Plateau.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!