长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (6): 1339-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202506015

•　生态环境　• 上一篇    下一篇

武汉市生态修复政策分析及生态环境质量响应

郭海湘1, 2, 3，章可1，辛美仪1, 2，程昱1   

  1. 生态修复政策反映政府的意志和理念，是生态修复工程的指引与支撑。随着多项针对性修复政策的出台与执行，生态修复工程得以稳步推进，生态环境质量也会随之提高。为探讨生态修复政策的优化途径，进一步推动生态修复进程并改善生态系统质量，以武汉市为例，首先，对其2011~2021年间出台的生态修复政策文本进行分析，基于政策发文主体、政策主要内容及政策工具选择三方面梳理政策目的与手段，总结该时期内的政策变化及特征。其次，综合考虑上下层指标间的交叉联系，构建PSR-EHN生态安全评价指标体系，衡量2011~2021年间武汉市各区生态安全水平，分析生态环境质量变化。最后，结合相关性分析研究政策工具的使用对生态环境质量的影响。研究发现：（1）武汉市2011~2021年间生态修复政策发文的核心部门为市人民政府，仅有1项为联合部门发文，表明政府部门间的协作与联动不足。政策内容呈现碎片化与单一化的特点，缺乏多要素系统综合治理。政策工具结构失衡较为严重，导致政策推行较难。（2）研究期内武汉市生态安全水平虽略有波动，但总体上升仅713%，未来仍需持续加强生态环境保护工作以稳固成效。（3）生态环境质量的变化与各类政策工具的使用频次均呈现正相关关系，其中需求型工具影响程度最深。因此，未来武汉市政府应加快构建多要素综合治理政策体系，提高政策工具组合结构使用均衡性，以面对更加错综复杂的生态问题。
  • 出版日期:2025-06-20 发布日期:2025-06-27

Ecological Restoration Policies Analysis and Ecological Environment Quality Response in Wuhan

GUO Hai-xiang1,2,3, ZHANG Ke1, XIN Mei-yi1,2, CHENG Yu1   

  1. Ecological restoration policies which reflect the government's will and philosophy are the guidelines and support for ecological restoration projects.With the introduction and implementation of a number of targeted policies, ecological restoration projects can be steadily promoted, and the quality of the ecological environment will also be improved.In order to explore the optimization of ecological restoration policies, further promote the ecological restoration process and improve the quality of ecosystems, this paper takes Wuhan as an example, firstly based on the main body of the policy, the main content and the selection of policy tools, analyzes the text of ecological restoration policies issued from 2011 to 2021 and summarizes the policy changes and characteristics in this period.Secondly, considering the cross-linkages between the upper and lower indicators, the PSR-EHN ecological safety evaluation index system is constructed to measure the ecological safety level of Wuhan districts and analyze the changes of ecological environment quality during 2011-2021.Finally, correlation analysis is combined to study the impact of the use of policy tools on ecological environment quality.The study found that: (1) the core department that issued ecological restoration policies in Wuhan during the period of 2011-2021 was the municipal government, and only one policy document was issued by a joint department, which indicated that there was insufficient collaboration and linkage among government departments.The policy content is fragmented and decentralized, and lacks multi-factor systematic and comprehensive governance.The structural imbalance of policy instruments is serious, which makes it difficult to implement policies.(2) Although the ecological safety level of Wuhan fluctuates slightly during the study period, the overall increase is 713%, and it is necessary to continue to strengthen the ecological environmental protection work in order to stabilize the results in the future.(3) Changes in ecological environment quality are positively correlated with the frequency of using various policy tools, with demand-based tools having the deepest impact.Therefore, in the future, the Wuhan government should accelerate the construction of a multi-factor integrated governance policy system and improve the balance of the use of the policy tools in order to face more complicated ecological problems
  • Online:2025-06-20 Published:2025-06-27

PDF (PC)

19
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染：以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[2] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[3] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[4] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[5] 刘钢, 刘坤琳, 汪玮茜, 赵爽. 水质感知视角下水库移民满意度分析——基于有序逻辑回归的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .
[6] 戢晓峰, 刘丁硕. 基于3D理论与SEM的县域交通可达性与空间贫困的耦合机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1360 .
[7] 张大鹏, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 岳洋, 任亚文. 上海大都市区物流企业区位分布特征及其演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[8] 佘颖, 刘耀彬. 国内外绿色发展制度演化的历史脉络及启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1370 .
[9] 侯雯嘉, 陈长青, 乔辉, 孙新素, 周曙东. 1980~2009年长江下游地区油菜冻害时空特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .
[10] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .
ISSN 1004-8227
CN 42-1320/X
主管：中国科学院
主办：中国科学院武汉文献情报中心
地址： 武汉市武昌小洪山西区25号 中国科学院武汉文献情报中心内《长江流域资源与环境》编辑部
邮编：430071　
电话：027-87198181
E-mail： bjb@mail.whlib.ac.cn

版权所有 © 2018 《长江流域资源与环境》编辑部