长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (10): 2338-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202510016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

LUCC影响下洞庭湖区生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险耦合特征研究

谭洁1,廖朝阳1,余德1*,邓慧婷1,张明2,3   

  1. (1.湖南农业大学风景园林与艺术设计学院,湖南 长沙 410128;2.湖南省国土资源规划院,湖南 长沙 410007;3. 国土资源评价与利用湖南省重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410007)
  • 出版日期:2025-10-20 发布日期:2025-10-23

Coupling Characteristics of Ecosystem Service Value and Landscape Ecological Risk in the Dongting Lake Area under Land Use/Land Cover Change

TAN Jie1, LIAO Zhao-yang1, YU De1, DENG Hui-ting1, ZHANG Ming2,3   

  1. (1.College of Landscape Architecture and Art Design, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China; 2. Hunan land and Resources Planning Institute, Changsha 410007, China;3.Hunan Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Utilization, Changsha 410007, China)
  • Online:2025-10-20 Published:2025-10-23

摘要: 洞庭湖区作为长江流域重要的湿地屏障与生态系统服务核心供给区,其生态系统服务状况和生态风险评估对该区域生态安全格局搭建与生态系统可持续发展具有重要意义。基于洞庭湖区1996~2020年遥感影像解译数据,采用改进的生态系统服务价值评估、景观生态风险评价、热点分析等方法探究了洞庭湖区土地利用/覆被变化(LUCC)影响下生态系统服务价值(ESV)与景观生态风险(LER)的时空演变特征及二者耦合性。结果表明:(1)研究期内,洞庭湖区耕地持续增加,草地、未利用地持续减少,水域呈现波动性减少趋势,林地、建设用地为波动性增加趋势;(2)ESV呈先减小后增大变化趋势,其总量减少了212.47亿元,减少幅度为8.33%,LER略有降低,呈持续下降变化趋势,平均值从0.7814降为0.7332;ESV冷热点分布格局较稳定,而LER热点区呈缩小趋势,二者热点区均主要分布在洞庭湖区水域范围,冷点区则主要分布在研究区周边的林地、草地;(3)洞庭湖区ESV与LER耦合协调度的发展趋势为“先减小后增大”,呈“中间高四周低”特征,整体以“ 发展较为失衡”和“勉强均衡发展”类型为主。研究结果可为构建洞庭湖区生态产品价值实现和大湖流域生态安全格局构建提供参考。

Abstract: As a critical wetland ecosystem in the Yangtze River Basin, the Dongting Lake region has undergone substantial ecological reorganization under land use transitions. This study quantified the spatiotemporal coupling relationships between ecosystem service value (ESV) and landscape ecological risk (LER) in response to land use/cover change (LUCC) during 1996-2020 through multi-temporal remote sensing analysis. The results revealed that the cropland consistently expanded, while grassland and unused land decreased. Water bodies experienced a fluctuating decline, whereas forested areas and built-up land increased.ESV initially declined before rebounding, ultimately resulting in a net reduction of 21.247 billion RMB (8.33%), while LER showed a slight but consistent downward trend, with an average decline from 0.7814 to 0.7332. Water bodies were identified as both high-value ESV providers and high-risk LER areas, with stable ESV hotspots in lake water bodies and cold spots primarily in surrounding forested and grassland areas. Meanwhile, LER hotspots showed a shrinking trend within water bodies, with an increasing spatial aggregation, whereas cold spots remained in forested and grassland areas. The coupling coordination degree between ESV and LER followed a “decline–increase” pattern, with water bodies exhibiting a higher coupling degree than other land use types, indicating a state of “moderately coordinated development.” Spatially, the coordination degree was higher in central areas and lower in peripheral regions, reflecting “relatively imbalanced” and “barely balanced” development outside water bodies, while areas with high coupling coordination showed an expanding trend. These results elucidated complex LUCC-ESV-LER interdependencies in watershed ecosystems, and provided critical insights for optimizing ecological security frameworks and enhancing value realization mechanisms in major river basins.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!