长江流域资源与环境 >> 2026, Vol. 35 >> Issue (1): 86-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202601008

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江经济带三大城市群国土空间利用效率耦合协调研究

颜美美1,陈万旭1,谷天赐2,3,刘晴晴1,刘培文1,潘思佩4,曾  杰1,刘志玲5*   

  1. (1.中国地质大学(武汉)区域生态过程与环境演变湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430074;2.北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室,北京 100875;3.北京师范大学地理科学学部自然资源学院土地资源与区域发展研究中心,北京 100875;4.南京农业大学公共管理学院,江苏 南京 210095;5.中国地质大学(武汉)公共管理学院,湖北 武汉 430074)
  • 出版日期:2026-01-20 发布日期:2026-01-20

Coupled Coordination of Territorial Spatial Utilization Efficiency in the Three Major Urban Agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

YAN Mei-mei1, CHEN Wan-xu1, GU Tian-ci2,3, LIU Qing-qing1, LIU Pei-wen1, PAN Si-pei4, ZENG Jie1, LIU Zhi-ling5   

  1. (1.Hubei Key Laboratory of Regional Ecology and Environmental Change, School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China; 2.State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology (ESPRE), Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; 3.School of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; 4.School of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; 5.School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China)
  • Online:2026-01-20 Published:2026-01-20

摘要: 提升国土空间利用效率、促进城镇、农业、生态空间利用效率的协调发展,是缓解人地矛盾、实现区域可持续发展的有效路径。长江经济带作为国家战略核心区,其三大城市群仍面临生态空间压缩、资源错配等严峻挑战。科学评估长江经济带三大城市群国土空间利用效率及其耦合协调特征,对于实现区域可持续发展、优化资源配置、推动长江经济带区域一体化与高质量发展具有重要意义。以2000~2020年为研究期,选取长江经济带三大城市群的70个地级市作为研究对象,构建超效率SBM模型测度城镇、农业与生态空间利用效率;采用探索性空间数据分析方法解析子系统间的空间关联特征;通过耦合协调度模型量化三类空间利用效率的协同发展水平。结果显示:(1)2000~2020年,长江经济带三大城市群各子系统的空间利用效率差异明显。城镇与农业空间利用效率持续上升,年均增长率分别为16.3%和5.9%;生态空间利用效率则呈下降趋势,平均效率值从2000年的0.302下降到2020年的0.251。(2)2000~2020年各子系统全局空间自相关作用逐渐增加,城镇-农业空间以及城镇-生态空间利用效率之间存在正相关关系,农业-生态空间利用效率之间存在负相关关系。局部空间自相关特征以显著高-高区和显著低-高区为主。(3)2000~2020年长江经济带三大城市群各区域国土空间利用效率耦合协调性整体上升,且耦合协调度在空间上呈现出“中心-外围”的分布特征,协调区从9个增至16个,截至2020年仍有54个城市处于失调状态(占比77.1%)。未来需推动长江经济带三大城市群的协调发展,优化区域内城镇、农业与生态空间的布局,探索符合不同区域特征的空间发展策略,促进区域间优势互补,实现可持续的高质量发展。

Abstract: Enhancing the efficiency of territorial space utilization and promoting the coordinated development of urban, agricultural, and ecological space utilization are effective pathways to alleviate the tension between population and land resources and achieve sustainable regional development.The Yangtze River Economic Belt, as a core area of national strategy, still faces severe challenges such as the compression of ecological space and the misallocation of resources in its three major urban agglomerations.Scientifically evaluating the territorial spatial utilization efficiency and its coupled coordination characteristics of the three major urban agglomerations is of great significance for achieving regional sustainable development, optimizing resource allocation, and promoting the integration and high-quality development of the study area.This study took the period from 2000 to 2020 as the research period, and selected 70 prefecture-level cities in the three major urban agglomerations of the Yangtze River Economic Belt as the research objects.The Super-SBM model was constructed to measure the utilization efficiency of urban, agricultural, and ecological spaces.The exploratory spatial data analysis was used to parse the spatial association characteristics between subsystems.The coordinated development level of the utilization efficiency of the three types of spaces was quantified using the coupled coordination degree model. The results showed that: (1) There were significant differences in the spatial utilization efficiency of each subsystem in the three major urban agglomerations.The utilization efficiency of urban and agricultural spaces continued to rise, with the average annual growth rates of 16.3% and 5.9%, respectively.The utilization efficiency of ecological space generally declined, with the average efficiency value decreasing from 0.302 in 2000 to 0.251 in 2020.(2) The global spatial autocorrelation of each subsystem gradually increased, and there was a positive correlation between the utilization efficiency of urban-agricultural space and urban-ecological space, while there was a negative correlation between the utilization efficiency of agricultural-ecological space.The local spatial autocorrelation characteristics were mainly characterized by significant high-high and significant low-high clusters.(3) The coupled coordination of territorial spatial utilization efficiency in each region of the three major urban agglomerations showed an upward trend.The spatial distribution of the degree of coupled coordination showed the characteristic of "center-periphery" distribution.The number of coordinated areas increased from 9 to 16, but 54 cities were still in a state of disharmony (accounting for 77.1%).In the future, it is necessary to promote the coordinated development of the three major urban agglomerations, optimize the layout of urban, agricultural, and ecological spaces.It is also important to explore the spatial development strategies that meet the characteristics of different regions, and to promote the complementarity of advantages between regions to achieve sustainable high-quality development.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!