长江流域资源与环境 >> 2026, Vol. 35 >> Issue (2): 288-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202602002

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江经济带旅游化转型对居民福祉的影响及空间溢出效应

林鲁雄,王兆峰*   

  1. (湖南师范大学旅游学院,湖南 长沙 410081)
  • 出版日期:2026-02-20 发布日期:2026-02-26

Impact of Tourismification in the Yangtze River Economic Belt on Residents′ Well-being and Its Spatial Spillover Effects

LIN Lu-xiong, WANG Zhao-feng#br#   

  1. (Tourism College, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)
  • Online:2026-02-20 Published:2026-02-26

摘要: 旅游化转型是推动城市内涵式发展与持续提升居民福祉的关键动力。基于2000~2023年长江经济带108个城市的面板数据,综合构建旅游化与居民福祉评估体系,继而厘清二者时空演化格局及空间关联特征,依次采用固定效应模型、面板分位数模型和空间面板杜宾模型揭示了旅游化转型对居民福祉的影响及空间溢出效应。研究发现:(1)旅游化与居民福祉均呈现明显的“多极分化”与“梯度格局”,二者具有显著的正向空间关联,但关联强度随时间呈倒“U”型变化趋势。局部空间关联主要表现为4种类型,其中高-高(H-H)集聚区集中分布于下游,而低-低(L-L)、低-高(L-H)等类型则多位于中上游地区。(2)旅游化对居民福祉具有显著正向影响。基准回归表明,旅游化水平每提升1%,居民福祉平均提高0.34%,该结论通过一系列稳健性检验。面板分位数回归进一步显示,旅游化对高福祉城市的边际促进效应更强。(3)旅游化对居民福祉的影响存在空间溢出效应,且表现出明显的区域与城市类型异质性。空间异质性分析发现,旅游化的直接促进效应在上游、下游城市以及旅游城市中更为突出;在空间溢出方面,下游地区与旅游城市呈现显著正向溢出,而上中游地区与非旅游城市则未表现出显著或呈现负向溢出。

Abstract: Tourismification serves as a critical driver for promoting connotative urban development and continuously enhancing residents' well-being. Based on panel data from 108 cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2023, this study constructs comprehensive evaluation systems for both tourismification and resident well-being. It clarifies their spatiotemporal evolution patterns and spatial correlation characteristics. Subsequently, a series of econometric models-including the fixed-effects model, panel quantile regression model, and spatial panel Durbin model-are employed to reveal the impact of tourismification on resident well-being and its spatial spillover effects. The main findings are as follows:(1) Both tourismification and resident well-being exhibit distinct "multi-polarization" and "gradient patterns," showing a significant positive spatial correlation. Notably, the strength of this correlation has followed an inverted-U-shaped trend over time. Local spatial associations are primarily manifested in four types: High-High (H-H) clusters are concentrated in downstream regions, while Low-Low (L-L) and Low-High (L-H) types are predominantly located in mid- and upstream areas. (2)Tourismification has a significant positive impact on resident well-being. Baseline regression results indicate that a 1% increase in tourismification level leads to an average increase of 0.34% in resident well-being, a conclusion that holds after a series of robustness checks. Panel quantile regression further reveals that the marginal promoting effect of tourismification is stronger in cities with already high levels of well-being.(3) The impact of tourismification on resident well-being involves spatial spillover effects, which demonstrate significant heterogeneity across regions and city types. Spatial heterogeneity analysis shows that the direct promoting effect of tourismification is more pronounced in upstream cities, downstream cities, and designated tourism cities. Regarding spatial spillovers, downstream regions and tourism cities exhibit significant positive spillovers, whereas mid-upstream regions and non-tourism cities show either insignificant or negative spillover effects.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!