长江流域资源与环境 >> 2006, Vol. 15 >> Issue (1): 120-124.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

用参评因子动态排序法评价环境综合质量

张 燕1,邓西海2,高 翔1,窦贻俭1,彭补拙1   

  • 收稿日期:2005-03-01 修回日期:2005-06-10 出版日期:2006-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 张 燕

EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPREHENSIVE QUALITY BY IMPROVED ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS METHOD

ZHANG Yan1, DENG Xi-hai2, GAO Xiang1, DOU Yi-jian1, PENG Bu-zhuo1   

  • Received:2005-03-01 Revised:2005-06-10 Online:2006-01-20
  • Contact: ZHANG Yan

摘要: 评价环境综合质量常用的方法是计算加权平均的综合指数,其中权重的确定又多用层次分析法(AHP)。设计以实际监测数据为依据计算两个参数yi1和yi2,并据此对各因子进行分类并排序,由此可定性确定各因子对环境总体污染的相对重要性,并判识环境污染中的关键因子、预警因子、趋好转的因子及可不必特别关注的因子;为定量确定各因子在综合评价中的权重,再依排序位次对其赋值,然后利用所赋之值进行因子间的两两比较以克服AHP法一般应用中因各人掌握标准有异而造成比较结果的不确定性,使权重确定完全建立在监测数据的客观基础上。此外,因环境污染状况随时空改变,若需对不同时段或不同区域的环境综合质量进行评价,给各因子赋予不变的权重显然不妥,而用上述思路和方法可依据实测值的差别对不同时段或不同区域的环境评价因子进行有根据的差异排序,然后再用AHP法定权,这就使不同时空环境质量的比较更为客观合理。

关键词: 排序, 权重, 环境综合评价, 秦淮河

Abstract: Calculating arithmeticweighted average value of environmental quality comprehensive index is a common method in environmental quality comprehensive evaluation. And the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is a main method for determining its weight. In order to overcome the uncertainty due to different judgments based on different environmental information and criterion, an improved AHP method is designed for environmental quality comprehensive evaluation. The process of the improved AHP method involves the following key procedures. First the parameters yi1 and yi2 are calculated based on the environmental monitoring data. Second the pollution factors are put in order according to the symbol and value of yi1 and yi2. Third the different numerical value, which represents importance of each factor, is given to each pollution factor in light of seating order of factors. And forth the factor weights are achieved by the judgment matrix formed on the pairwise comparison of factors. Therefore, the weights of pollution factors are completely based on the monitoring data. Moreover, because the state of environmental pollution will change with time and space it is necessary to give different weight to each factor while evaluating environmental comprehensive quality in different periods and different regions. The improved AHP method can just be used to compare environmental comprehensive quality objectively among different periods and spaces.

Key words: seating order, weight, environmental quality comprehensive evaluation, Qinhuai River

[1] 赵敏, 张丽旭. 长江口海域表层沉积物环境质量的综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 284-291.
[2] 杜俊, 丁文峰, 任洪玉. 四川省不同类型山洪灾害与主要影响因素的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(11): 1977-1983.
[3] 汤莉莉,牛生杰,徐建强,谢学俭,杨雪贞,晏 培. 外秦淮河疏浚后底泥重金属污染与潜在生态风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 424-424.
[4] 苏伟忠,杨桂山,顾朝林. 秦淮河流域城镇用地增长格局及其演化机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 440-440.
[5] 李发文,冯平,张行南. GIS和模糊相似贴近度在洪灾安置区评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(2): 256-256.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陈 勇,陈国阶,杨定国. 岷江上游聚落分布规律及其生态特征——以四川理县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 72 -77 .
[2] 陈正洪,万素琴,毛以伟. 三峡库区复杂地形下的降雨时空分布特点分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 623 -627 .
[3] 张磊,董立新,吴炳方,周万村. 三峡水库建设前后库区10年土地覆盖变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 107 -112 .
[4] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[5] 禹 娜,陈立侨,赵泉鸿. 太湖介形类动物丰度与生物量[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 546 .
[6] 孔令强. 水电工程农村移民入股安置模式初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 185 .
[7] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[8] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[9] 于苏俊,张 继,夏永秋. 基于遗传算法的可持续土地利用动态规划[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 180 -184 .
[10] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .