青藏公路路堤边坡水土保持措施及效益分析

长江流域资源与环境 >> 2008, Vol. 17 >> Issue (4): 619-619.

青藏公路路堤边坡水土保持措施及效益分析

徐宪立1,2,张科利2*,刘雯3| 孔亚平4| 陈济丁4

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-07-20

EFFECTIVENESS OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ON QINGHAITIBET HIGHWAY SLOPES

XU Xianli1,2| ZHANG Keli2| LIU Wen3| KONG Yaping4| CHEN Jiding4

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

公路建设加速了区域的原有侵蚀，为了摸清公路边坡的侵蚀特征，寻找有效的防治措施，在青藏公路边坡布设不同水土保持措施的径流观测小区，进行了两年的观测（2003年和2004年），结果表明：（1）工程措施具有较好的水土保持效益，其减流（减沙）效益在第一年和第二年分别达到3883％（8189％）和48.72％（9581％），其中截排水措施的水土保持效益一方面说明公路路面来水也是边坡侵蚀的重要动力，有效拦截路面来水将会极大地减少径流和泥沙，另一方面也说明要提高公路边坡土壤侵蚀的预测能力，应该将路面来水作为重要的驱动力之一；（2）植被措施可以起到一定的减流减沙效果，其中人工植被措施有很大的潜力，其减蚀效益都在50％以上；（3）综合措施表现出了极好的水土保持效益（减流在40％以上，减沙在97％以上），尤其土工格室+植被措施，兼具水土保持与景观双重效益。该研究可以为青藏高原地区的水土保持设计和生态环境保护规划提供数据支持。〖

关键词: 青藏公路, 路堤边坡, 水土保持措施, 减流减沙效益

Abstract:

To understand the characteristics of road erosion and find effective control measures,runoff plots were set up on QinghaiTibet roadside slopes (fillslope).After twoyear study (2003 and 2004),it is found that (1) It is obvious for engineering measures to control runoff and soil loss.The reduction percent of runoff (soil loss) was 3883％（8189％）and 4872％(9581％),respectively in 2003 and 2004.The effects of drain water from road surface showed that road surface water was also an important driving force for erosion on roadside slopes.To predict soil loss more accurately,runoff from road surface should be considered in building erosion prediction model.In addition,controlling road surface runoff would efficiently minimize soil erosion on roadside slopes. (2) Grass measures only showed some effects in controlling erosion;however,the effects of natural grass proved that planted grass would have great potential effects on soil erosion control if they were well established. (3) Engineering control measures could intercept runoff and sediment at initial stage just after construction,keeping water and nutrient and promoting vegetation growth,which would increase the capacity of vegetation in intercepting runoff and sediment.So the combination of two measures is the most effective way to control runoff and soil loss,all combined measures could reduce more than 40% of runoff and more than 97% of soil loss.〖

Key words: QinghaiTibet Highway, roadside slopes, erosion control measures, effectiveness of soil and water conservation〖

徐宪立,张科利,刘雯,孔亚平, 陈济丁. 青藏公路路堤边坡水土保持措施及效益分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 619-619.

XU Xianli, ZHANG Keli,LIU Wen,KONG Yaping, CHEN Jiding. EFFECTIVENESS OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ON QINGHAITIBET HIGHWAY SLOPES[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2008, 17(4): 619-619.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

推荐阅读 10

[1]	张政, 付融冰\| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[2]	曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[3]	许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[4]	郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[5]	徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[6]	刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[7]	陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[8]	张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[9]	周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[10]	翁君山,段宁\| 张颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .