喀斯特地区土壤水中溶解有机碳浓度对植被退化的响应

长江流域资源与环境 >> 2010, Vol. 19 >> Issue (7): 797-.

喀斯特地区土壤水中溶解有机碳浓度对植被退化的响应

肖德安^1,2,3| 王世杰^1,2*| 容丽^2,4| 刘方^2,5| 冉景丞⁶| 刘伟^1,2,3| 程安云^1,2

（1.中国科学院地球化学研究所环境地球化学国家重点实验室|贵州贵阳 550002； 2.中国科学院普定喀斯特生态与石漠化试验研究站|贵州普定562100； 3.中国科学院研究生院|北京 100049；4.贵州师范大学地理与环境科学学院|贵州贵阳 550001；5.贵州大学环境与资源研究所|贵州贵阳 5500255；6.贵州茂兰国家级自然保护区管理局|贵州荔波 558400 ）

出版日期:2010-07-20

RESPONSE OF DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON IN SOIL WATER TO THE VEGETATION DEGRADATION IN KARST AREAS

XAO Dean1,2,3, WANG Shijie1,2,RONG Li2,4, LIU Fang2,5, RAN Jingcheng6, LIU Wei1,2,3, CHENG Anyun1,2

(1. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550002, China|2. Experiment and Research Station of Karst Ecology and Rocky Desertification, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Puding 562100,  China;3. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China|4. School of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001|5. Institute of Environment and Resource, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China|6. Management Bureau, Maolan National Nature Reserve, Libo 558400, China)

Online:2010-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

按退化程度在茂兰喀斯特地区选取的4种不同植被类型依次为原生性乔木森林、次生性乔灌混合林、灌木林、灌丛草坡，并对各植被退化系统中1a内的土壤水中溶解有机碳（DOC）浓度变化特征进行测试分析，并探讨其对不同退化程度的植被的响应特征。结果显示：（1）各种植被类型下土壤水DOC含量按月份均呈现出由低到高、再由高到低的变化趋势，在6月底出现峰值；（2）土壤水DOC含量对降雨量具有很好的响应关系；（3）土壤水DOC含量随植被退化程度的加剧而呈现出递增的趋势，即退化的植被系统中土壤水的DOC含量大于未退化的植被系统，说明未退化的土壤植被系统比较稳定，不易受到外界因素的干扰，贮存能力大，流失少。研究结果表明对植被退化响应灵敏的土壤水DOC含量可以作为评价土壤和植被关联退化的一个有效指标。

Abstract:

The authors choose four sample plots with different vegetation types in Maolan karst areas according to their degradation degree,namely the virgin arborforests,secondary arborshrub mixed forests,shrubs and shrubgrassland,and then concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil water at four sample plots were sampled monthly for one year and analyzed,respectively.The results indicate that:(1)DOC concentrations are higher in warm and wet seasons than those of cool and dry seasons in one year,which increase to maximum at June and then decrease.(2)DOC concentrations show a significant dependence on rainfalls.(3)DOC concentrations increase with vegetation degradation degree,and are higher in a degraded ecosystem than those of a nondegraded ecosystem,indicating that a virgin soilvegetation system is stable with less runoff and more storage and is not easily interrupted from outside disturbs.These results indicate that DOC values could be served as an effective indicator for vegetation degradation.

肖德安, 王世杰, 容丽, 刘方, 冉景丞, 刘伟, 程安云. 喀斯特地区土壤水中溶解有机碳浓度对植被退化的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(7): 797-.

XIAO De-An, WANG Shi-Jie, RONG Li, LIU Fang, DAN Jing-Cheng, LIU Wei, CHENG An-Yun. RESPONSE OF DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON IN SOIL WATER TO THE VEGETATION DEGRADATION IN KARST AREAS[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2010, 19(7): 797-.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

推荐阅读 10

[1]	向波,纪昌明,蓝霄峰,罗庆松. 地下水非稳定流问题的有限分析五点格式[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 721 .
[2]	刘传江,朱劲松. 三峡库区土地资源承载力现状与可持续发展对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 522 .
[3]	肖思思, 黄贤金, 彭补拙, 濮励杰, 陈逸. 经济发达县域耕地土壤重金属污染评价及其影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 674 .
[4]	陈逸,黄贤金,彭补拙,濮励杰,张健 . 经济发达区不同土地利用方式下土壤中镉的含量特征——以江苏省昆山市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 391 .
[5]	魏显虎\|杜耘,蔡述明,薛怀平,刘韬,. 清江流域1995～2000年土壤侵蚀时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 120 -124 .
[6]	姚书春,薛滨,夏威岚. 洪湖历史时期人类活动的湖泊沉积环境响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 475 -480 .
[7]	林建伟,王里奥, 赵建夫,张军,袁辉. 三峡库区生活垃圾的重金属污染程度评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 104 -108 .
[8]	胡大伟,卞新民,许泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[9]	张洁\| 张志斌\| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[10]	邹小兵,曾婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .