长江流域资源与环境 >> 2011, Vol. 20 >> Issue (06): 749-.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

南水北调西线一期工程大渡河流域减水段生态水文浅析

王秀英,白音包力皋,王东胜   

  1. (1. 中国水利水电科学研究院|北京 100038|2. 国家水电发展研究中心|北京 100038)
  • 出版日期:2011-06-20

PRELIMINARY ECOHYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS IN THE DADUHE RIVER TRANSFER AREA IN THE FIRST STAGE OF WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHNORTH WATER TRANSFER PROJECT |

WANG Xiuying1|Baiyinbaoligao1, WANG Dongsheng1,2   

  1. (1.China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research,Beijing 100038,China;2.National Research Center for Sustainable Hydropower Development,Beijing 100038,China
  • Online:2011-06-20

摘要:

南水北调西线一期工程调水前河流生态水文特征、调水对生态影响的研究对于进一步探讨有利于生态保护的水利工程调控措施具有重要意义。采用IHA方法分析大渡河流域调水区河流调水前的水文资料,提取对基本生态条件维护具有重要意义的月基流量作为特征流量,采用Tennant法评价基流量对生态的有利程度,以历史上曾经发生过的特征流量对生态的意义作为参照,对比分析一期调水工程实施后水文站月平均流量对生态的有利程度,间接推求坝址下游近坝段特征基流量,探究调水后月均流量对生态的有利程度。结果表明:随着沿程流量的恢复,绰斯甲站、足木足站河道水量得到恢复,调水后月平均流量对生态有利程度能达到较好状态;坝址下游河段调水后月平均流量的生态有利程度汛期较差,珠安达和霍那坝址下游6月份甚至为“极差”水平

Abstract:

It is important to further explore the nature features before the SouthNorth Water Transfer Project and hydraulic control measures on ecology protection after the project. This paper used IHA method to analyze the discharge data in Daduhe River transfer area before project,then took the monthly low flows as the characteristic flows,which was important to maintain the basic ecological river system,and used Tennant method to assess them.With taking the characteristic flow as a reference,the paper concerned the advantage to the ecosystem of the monthly average flows postproject in the stations reaches.It also calculated indirectly the monthly low flows downstream the dams and discussed the advantage to the ecosystem of monthly average flows in the dams reaches.The results show that with the restoration of flow along the way,the discharge in Chuosijia station and Zumuzu station had been restored so that the monthly mean discharge was better to the river ecology after the fist stage water transfer project.While,the monthly mean discharge downstream the dams were too low to support the normal river ecology.The river ecological conditions in the downstream of the Zhu’anda dam and the Huona dam were“very poor”under the situation of the monthly mean discharge in June after the project

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 解晓南,许朋柱,秦伯强. 太湖流域苏锡常地区地面沉降若干问题探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 125 -131 .
[2] 段学军, 陈 雯. 省域空间开发功能区划方法探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 540 -545 .
[3] 陈永柏, 邓 云| 梁瑞峰. 溪洛渡水电站叠梁门取水方式减缓下泄低温水的优化调度[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 340 .
[4] 罗固源, 杜娴, 许晓毅, 蔡文良, 曹佳, 舒为群. 邻苯二甲酸酯在长江重庆段水体的概率风险分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(1): 79 .
[5] 乔伟峰|孙在宏|邵繁荣, 倪婷|冯松松|张果. 高度城市化区域土地利用结构演化与驱动因素分析——以苏州市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(05): 557 .
[6] 陈文静| 张燕萍| 赵春来| 王昌来. 近年长江湖口江段鱼类群落组成及多样性[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(06): 684 .
[7] 徐长乐| 徐廷廷| 俞琦. 上海海洋科技创新的SWOT分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(07): 797 .
[8] 曹志宏 |陈志超 |郝晋珉. 中国城乡居民食品消费变化趋势分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(10): 1173 .
[9] 郭谁琼, 黄贤金. 气候变化经济学研究综述[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(11): 1314 .
[10] 周 峰|许有鹏|吕慧华. 基于MODIS-EVI数据的长江三角洲地区植被变化的特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(11): 1363 .