长江流域资源与环境 >> 2011, Vol. 20 >> Issue (1): 79-.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

邻苯二甲酸酯在长江重庆段水体的概率风险分析

罗固源,杜娴,许晓毅,蔡文良,曹佳,舒为群   

  1. (1.重庆大学三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室|重庆 400045;2.第三军医大学军事预防医学院环境卫生学教研室|重庆 430030)
  • 出版日期:2011-01-20

PROBABILISTIC RISK ANALYSIS FOR PHTHALATE ACID ESTERS OF WATER BODY IN CHONGQING SECTION OF THE YANGTZE RIVER

LUO Guyuan1, DU Xian1, XU Xiaoyi1, CAI Wenliang1, CAO Jia2, SHU Weiqun2   

  1. (1.Key Laboratory of Ecoenvironment in Three Gorge Reservoir Region Under the State Ministry of Education,Chongqing 400045,China;2.Departement of Environmental Hygiene,School of Military Preventive Medidcine,Third Military Medical University,Chongqing 430038,China)
  • Online:2011-01-20

摘要:

以长江重庆段水体12个采样断面4种邻苯二甲酸酯(PAEs)的监测结果及水生生物的生态毒性参数无观察效应浓度(NOEC)为基础资料,采用安全阈值和概率曲线分布两种概率风险评价方法分析了邻苯二甲酸酯的相对生态风险。研究结果表明:邻苯二甲酸二甲酯(DMP)、邻苯二甲酸二乙酯(DEP)、邻苯二甲酸正丁酯(DBP)、邻苯二甲酸双(2乙基己基)酯(DEHP)的安全阈值分别为4 31079、2171、147、199,对水生生物无风险。以5%水生生物物种受影响作为可接受的效应水平终点(HC5),采用概率曲线分布进行分析,DBP、DEHP的浓度超过毒性值的风险概率分别为106×10-2、235×10-4,4种邻苯二甲酸酯风险大小依次为:DBP>DEHP>DEP>DMP,与安全阈值法结果一致。两种概率风险方法从不同的角度反映了污染物的生态风险。

Abstract:

Based on the observed PAEs concentration of 12 sampling sections from the area and No Observed Effect Concentrations(NOEC)of PAEs to aquatic organism species from the EPA database,two approaches were applied and evaluated for probabilistic risk assessment of 4 Phthalate Acid Esters(PAEs)in the Yangtze River of Chongqing section.It was found that 10% of the safety margin value were 4 31079,2171,147,199 for Dimethyl ester(DMP),Diethyl ester(DEP),Dibutyl ester(DBP),bis(2Ethylhexyl)ester(DEHP),respectively,which indicated nonpotential ecological risk for aquatic organism.In addition,application of probability distribution curves in the basic safety margin value and using HC5(hazardous concentration for 5% of species)as the endpoint of effect levels,the probability of exceeding an exposure concentration for DBP and DEHP were 106×10-2 and 235×10-4 respectively.Furthermore,associated with this specific probability of effects,4 individual PAEs followed the order of DBP>DEHP>DEP>DMP,which was in accordance with the method of margin of safety.Two kinds of probabilistic risk methods reflected the ecological risks of Phthalate Acid Esters from different angles.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王毛兰,| 胡春华,周文斌,. 丰水期鄱阳湖氮磷含量变化及来源分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 138 .
[2] 姚成胜, 朱鹤健. 基于能值理论的福建省农业系统动态研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 247 .
[3] 沈亦龙,何品晶,邵立明. 太湖五里湖底泥污染特性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 584 -588 .
[4] 涂建军. 四川省入境旅游客流时空动态模式研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(4): 338 -342 .
[5] 于涛方, 吴志强. 长江三角洲都市连绵区边界界定研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 397 -404 .
[6] 邹胜章,梁 彬,朱志伟,梁小平. 生态系统变化对岩溶水资源的影响——以湘西为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 599 -603 .
[7] 王学雷,吴后建,任宪友. 长江中游湿地系统驱动关系的演变及保护展望[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 644 -648 .
[8] 梁武湖,马光文,王 黎,刘建明. 南水北调西线一期工程对金沙江上游梯级开发的发电影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 6 -9 .
[9] 周学武,王 芳. 农业综合开发项目优化设计及典型案例分析——以江汉平原荆州市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 76 -80 .
[10] 刘 刚,沈 镭,孙尚志,张菲菲,. 金沙江下游梯级电站开发影响区域的资源开发与产业可持续发展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 565 .