长江流域资源与环境 >> 2013, Vol. 22 >> Issue (06): 793-.

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

自然观光地旅游者的风险感知变化及差异分析——以九寨沟自然风景区为例

朱建华|张 捷|刘法建|张宏磊|卢韶婧|孙景荣   

  1. (南京大学地理与海洋科学学院|江苏 南京 210093)
  • 出版日期:2013-06-20

RISK PERCEPTION CHANGES AND DIFFERENCES ANALYSIS FOR NATURAL SIGHTSEEING TOURISTS ——A CASE STUDY OF JIUZHAIGOU

ZHU Jianhua, ZHANG Jie, LIU Fajian, ZHANG Honglei, LU Shaojing, SUN Jingrong   

  1. (School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • Online:2013-06-20

摘要:

旅游风险感知就是旅游者在其旅游行为前及过程中对可能发生的负面结果的感知,风险感知目前已成为旅游安全研究中的重要内容。通过构建旅游者风险感知量表,以九寨沟为案例地进行实证研究得出:(1)旅游者感知风险主要分为3个维度:功能障碍型、危机事件型及文化冲突型;(2)旅游者的总体风险感知较小,其中功能障碍型风险较大,其次为危机事件和文化冲突,并且地震等危机事件并未成为旅游者担心的主要风险;(3)不同旅游者的差异主要体现在“花费冤枉钱”、“迷路或与同伴走失”、“语言障碍”等方面,性别、地域、是否经历过灾害、是否买保险、是否带药品等因素对各类风险感知差异没有显著影响。旅游者风险感知研究为完善旅游安全理论提供了参考,并且对旅游地的风险管理提供了依据,具有指导和借鉴意义

Abstract:

According to Maslow′s Need Hierarchy Theory, safety is the second most significant need for human beings,only next to physiological need. Since tourism is a thriving industry worldwide and increasing people are involved in travelling, security has become one of the most important factors for tourists. Tourism Risk Perception is tourists’ perception of negative consequences that may occur before and during their travels. Based on the literature review, risk perception has developed into an important part in tourism study nowadays, and has a farreaching influence on tourism decisionmaking process. Through openended questionnaires’ research, this paper builds a scale of tourists’ risk perception composed of 18 indicators, including geological disasters, meteorological disasters, crime, disease, traffic accidents and so on, which provides basis and reference for research in other natural sightseeing. Taken Jiuzhaigou as an example, through empirical analysis, this paper gets some conclusions as follows. (1) Based on factorial analysis, the risks tourists percept can be divided into three main dimensions: dysfunction, crisis event and cultural conflict. Among them, dysfunction is the most at risk, crisis event comes next, while cultural conflict is least. (2) The overall risk perception of tourists is inconspicuous. And the risks perceived during the tour are less than which were imagined before the travel. This indicates that travelling in Jiuzhaigou is safer than peoples’ imagination.  The crisis events such as earthquakes are not the main risks which tourists worried about.(3) The parameter test analysis shows that: dysfunction risk has a significant difference among tourists who have travelled to Jiuzhaigou for different times, and who differ in age and education level. Cultural conflict risk shows a significant difference among tourists who have different occupation, education level and income level. And crisis event risk has no difference among different groups of tourists. The differences among different groups of tourists are mainly reflected in “waste of money”, “lost or losing companion” and "language barriers". Besides, gender, region, whether or not experienced disasters, whether or not bought insurance, whether or not carried drugs and other factors have no significant effects on the differences among various types of risk perceptions. Based on these findings, some recommendations are raised to tourism marketers for promoting the tourism products. The tourists' risk perception research in this study provides a reference to improve tourism safety theory and has an important significance on the planning and management of tourist destination. This scale of tourists’ risk perception has its own characteristics in natural disasters and cultural conflicts dimensions. And it provides a preliminary framework for the research on tourism risk perception in natural sightseeing, such as Jiuzhaigou. The adaptability of the scale of tourists’ risk perception in holiday and cultural tourist destinations could be researched further in the future.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[3] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[5] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[6] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[7] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[8] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[9] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .
[10] 王书国,段学军,姚士谋. 长江三角洲地区人口空间演变特征及动力机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 405 .