长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (03): 385-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201403012

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于灰色关联模型的山地城市生态安全动态评价

吴 晓|吴宜进   

  1. (华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院|湖北 武汉 430079)
  • 出版日期:2014-03-20

EVALUATION ON THE ECOSAFETY OF MOUNTAINOUS CITY BASED ON GRAY CORRELATION MODEL——A CASE STUDY OF THE WUSHAN COUNTY IN THE CITY OF CHONGQING

WU Xiao|WU Yijin   

  1. (College of Urban and Environmental Science,Center China Normal University,Wuhan 430079|China)
  • Online:2014-03-20

摘要:

随着“十八大”报告中全面建成小康社会目标的提出,我国的社会经济发展将进一步加快,生态环境所承受的压力势必也将增大,如何协调城市发展与城市的生态安全已经成为一个不可回避的问题。我国是一个多山的国家,山地、丘陵及高原面积占国土面积的69%,山区生态系统脆弱,自然灾害频发,水土流失严重,极大的制约了其社会经济的发展,因此以巫山为例,在世界经合组织建立的PSR模型框架下,将熵值赋权法与灰色系统理论相结合,通过分析巫山县各指标2001~2011年统计数据,用熵值法赋予权重值,计算各指标灰色关联度,得到了其生态安全状态,并对巫山县生态安全等级状况进行了动态评价。巫山县生态安全综合指数由2001年的0.59(Ⅲ级)发展到2011年的0.66(Ⅳ级),个别年份有些许波动,整体生态安全状况呈现良好的发展态势,生态环境压力有所缓解。生态安全综合指数及各分项指数较高,巫山县生态环境处于较好状态

Abstract:

As the goal of completely building a moderately prosperous society was raised in the report of 18th CPC National Congress,the development of society and economy in China would be further accelerated and the pressure on the environment was bound to increase as well.Ecological safety has become a very important part of national security and social stability.How to coordinate urban development and urban ecological safety has become a unavoidable problem.Moreover,China is a mountainous country in which mountainous region accounts for 69% of the land area.In the hilly areafragile mountain ecosystems,frequent natural disasters and serious soil erosion have restricted the social and economic development.Exploratory research on ecological safety had been done by some scholars.Currently,researchers mainly used comprehensive evaluation method,analytic hierarchy process evaluation method,the fuzzy matterelement method and the ecological footprint method to do the ecological safety evaluation.However,due to the differences inherent in the selection of ecological safety indices as well as each kind of methods,this article used the PressStateResponse framework model and gray system theory to assess ecological safety indices.In order to provide a scientific basis for decision making for the coordinated development of the socioeconomy and environment in Wushan County,the study combined the entropy weight method and gray system theory to analyze statistics of various indices of Wushan County from 2001 to 2011.The gray correlation analysis is a method which is a quantitative description and comparison of the development and changing situation of a system.The basic idea is to determine the degrees of geometric similarity between the referential data columns and a number of comparative data columns to decide whether they were closely linked,so that the magnitude relation between the various subsystems can be calculated.The research used the entropy method to assign weights to various indices, and calculated gray correlation degrees of each indices which had been reflecting the ecological safety state of Wushan County,and then evaluated the situation of ecological safety level of Wushan County in 3 aspects of press,state and response.It was the first attempt that entropy empowerment and gray correlation analysis were combined and applied to the field of ecological evaluation in the mountain city.Relative to other methods,entropy empowerment was more objective and avoided other interference.So that the results of the evaluation would better reflect the actual situation of the study area.The procedure for calculation was presented in detail.On the basis of the computing results,the ecological safety index of Wushan County from 2001 to 2011 was developed from 059 (level Ⅲ) to 0.66 (level Ⅳ).The ecological safety indices values during these years had fluctuations,and the overall ecological safety conditions showed a good momentum of development,as a result the environmental pressures was eased in some degree.But the ecological security indices and its subindices are still in a high level.Moreover,most of the time the rise was not obvious,and ecological safety composite index was hovering around 06.The environment was in a safe state

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李宗尧,|杨桂山. 经济快速发展地区生态环境竞争力的评价方法——以安徽沿江地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 124 .
[2] 吕东亮. 汉江水质优于长江的原因刍议[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 102 -104 .
[3] 彭刚华,黄良英. 长江水质评价和预测模型探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 77 -82 .
[4] 张 雷,吴映梅. 长江干流地区区域发展与国家工业化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 633 -637 .
[5] 魏 伟,周 婕,许 峰. 大城市边缘区土地利用时空格局模拟——以武汉市洪山区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 174 -179 .
[6] 李友辉,董增川,孔琼菊. 廖坊水利工程对抚河流域生态承载力的影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 148 .
[7] 刘丛强 汪福顺 王雨春 王宝利. 河流筑坝拦截的水环境响应——来自地球化学的视角[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 384 .
[8] 袁 丰 陈江龙 吴 威 薛俊菲. 江苏省沿江开发区空间分工、制造业集聚与转移[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(5): 403 .
[9] 张 静, 钱 瑜, 张玉超. 基于GIS的景观生态功能指标分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 299 .
[10] 汪志聪, 吴卫菊, 左明, 李敦海. 巢湖浮游植物群落生态位的研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 685 .