长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (08): 1081-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201408006

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

微齿眼子菜与马来眼子菜对水深变化的适应性比较研究

宋鑫,曹特,祝国荣,李威,张霄林,倪乐意   

  1. (1中国科学院水生生物研究所东湖湖泊生态系统试验站,湖北 武汉 430072;
    2中国科学院大学,北京 100049;3河南师范大学水产学院,河南 新乡 453007)
  • 出版日期:2014-08-20

ADAPTIVE COMPARISON OF POTAMOGETON MAACKIANUS AND #br# P. MALAIANUS TO VARIOUS WATER DEPTHS IN #br# AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

SONG Xin1,2, CAO Te1, ZHU Guorong3,  LI Wei1,2, ZHANG Xiaolin1, NI Leyi1   

  1. (1Donghu Experimental Station of Lake Systems, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China;
    [JP2]2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;3College of Fisheries,Henan Normal University,Xinxiang 453007, China
  • Online:2014-08-20

摘要:

水深与水位波动是影响湖泊中沉水植被分布格局和物种多样性的重要因子。在洱海开展为期2个多月的原位实验,从大型浮台上悬挂吊盆模拟不同的水位梯度(2、4和6 m)和水位变化模式(水位上升、水位下降和水位波动)对微齿眼子菜和马来眼子菜生长的影响。实验结果表明:水深梯度和水位变化模式对两种植物的生物量、株高、节数和叶片数具有显著影响,推测微齿眼子菜在洱海的临界生长水深约为5 m,马来眼子菜的临界生长水深为35 m;超过临界水深后两种植物生物量和叶片数下降、株高和节数不增长。在2 m初始水深处光照相对充足,生物量随时间稳定增长,水深增加(20 cm/6 d×60 d)对两种植物的生物量均未造成显著影响,株高和节数随水深显著增加,具有响应空间增长的潜力。在初始水深为4 m时,进一步增加水深(20 cm/6 d×30 d)会抑制微齿眼子菜生长,继后减少(-10 cm/6 d×30 d)水深仍无法使其恢复生长;但先减少水深后增加水深可以小幅促进其生长。在初始水深为4 m时,3种水位变化模式对马来眼子菜的生物量影响不大,但减少水深后增加水深可以小幅促进其生长。初始水深6 m抑制两种植物的生长,并导致马来眼子菜死亡。实验结果表明,微齿眼子菜比马来眼子菜对弱光耐受性更好

Abstract:

 Water depth (WD) and water level fluctuation (WLF) play important roles in affecting diversity and distribution of submersed macrophytes in lakes In this study, an in situ experiment was carried out on a floating platform in Lake Erhai to explore effects of various WD and WLF on submersed macrophytes Potamogeton maackianus and P malaianus, [JP2]by planting the plants in buttes and hanging the buttes at 2 m, [JP]4 m and 6 m below water surface and adjusting WD of the buttes We observed that the WD and WLF affected growth, shoot height, shoot knots and leaf number of the plants significantly, and that 35 m and 5 m were critical maximum colonizing WD of P malaianus and  P maackianus, respectively The plants had lower biomass and less leaf number and their shoots did not elongate at deeper WD than the critical WD Increasing WD (20 cm/6 d×60 d) did not affect biomass, but increased shoot height and shoot knots of the plants at the initial 2 m WD Increasing WD (20 cm/6 d×30 d) deeper than 4 m inhibited growth of P maackianus, which could not be reversed by the following decreasing WD (-10 cm/6 d×30 d); however, decreasing WD from 4 m and then increasing WD released stressful effects of 4 m WD on the plant WLF did not affect growth of P malaianus at 4 m WD, but decreasing WD from 4 m and then increasing WD released stressful effects of 4 m WD on the plant as compared to the stable 4 m WD WD at 6 m inhibited growth of the two plant species and caused death of the plants P maackianus was more tolerated to weak light stress than P malaianus

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[2] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[3] 吕东亮. 汉江水质优于长江的原因刍议[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 102 -104 .
[4] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[5] 彭刚华,黄良英. 长江水质评价和预测模型探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 77 -82 .
[6] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[7] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[8] 张 雷,吴映梅. 长江干流地区区域发展与国家工业化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 633 -637 .
[9] 魏 伟,周 婕,许 峰. 大城市边缘区土地利用时空格局模拟——以武汉市洪山区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 174 -179 .
[10] 翁君山,段 宁| 张 颖. 嘉兴双桥农场大气颗粒物的物理化学特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 129 .