长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (11): 1588-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201411015

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

上海市典型城市河岸带不同植被类型下土壤反硝化作用研究

邓焕广,陈振楼,张菊,王东启,娄焕杰   

  1. (1. 聊城大学环境与规划学院,山东 聊城 252000;2. 华东师范大学资源与环境科学学院,上海 200062)
  • 出版日期:2014-11-20

STUDY ON SOIL DENITRIFICATION UNDER DIFFERENT VEGETATIONS IN TYPICAL URBAN RIPARIAN ZONE OF SHANGHAI

DENG Huanguang1, CHEN Zhenlou2, ZHANG Ju1, WANG Dongqi2, LOU Huanjie2   

  1. (1. School of Environment and Planning, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China; 2. School of Resources and Environmental Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Online:2014-11-20

摘要:

为了解城市河岸带不同植被类型下土壤的反硝化速率及其影响因子,在上海市城市河岸带的长风绿地选择了熊掌木、硕苞蔷薇和矮生百慕大草3种植被类型,于2012年3月(春初)、5月(春季)、7月(夏季)、11月(秋季)测定了其下不同深度(2~5 cm、12~15 cm、22~25 cm和32~35 cm)土壤的反硝化速率和土壤的粒度、含水率、SOC、NH4+和NO3-含量等基本理化性质。结果表明:长风绿地3种植被类型下土壤理化性质和反硝化速率具有一定的差异性,但均表现为2~5 cm深度土壤反硝化速率显著高于其他深度;熊掌木和硕苞蔷薇2~5 cm深度土壤反硝化速率均为春初显著高于其他季节,而草地2~5 cm深度反硝化速率在春夏季显著高于春初和秋季;其他深度土壤均不存在显著的季节性差异;植被类型、深度和季节对反硝化速率的单一和综合影响效应(除植被类型*深度外)均显著;反硝化速率与土壤的SOC、NH4+和NO3-含量呈极显著正相关(p<001),而与土壤含水率和气温没有显著相关关系

Abstract:

In order to study the soil denitrification rates under different vegetations in urban riparian zone of Shanghai, three sampling sites were chosen for denitrification measurement in Changfeng No. 2 greenbelt of Suzhou River riparian. The three sampling sites were distributed in the upstream part, middle part and downstream part along a transect of the riparian, which were respectively covered with three common green plants, namely, Fatshedera lizei, Cynodon dactylon and Rosa bracteata. Three parallel soil samples were taken from each soil layer (2-5 cm, 12-15cm, 22-25 cm and 32-35 cm) at each sampling site in March (early spring), May (spring), July (summer) and November (autumn) of 2012. In the laboratory, the denitrification rates of soil samples were determined using the C2H2 inhibition technique. Meanwhile, the basic physicochemical properties of soil including particle size, soil moisture content, soil organic matter (SOC) and concentrations of ammonia (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3-) nitrogen were also analyzed. The results showed that soil physicochemical properties and the denitrification rates of soils under the three representative green plants were different to some extent. Higher moisture content, SOC and ammonia nitrogen concentrations were found in soil under Rosa bracteata, while higher nitrate concentrations were found under Cynodon dactylon. In general, concentrations of SOC, NH4+ and NO3- were higher in early spring or spring and decreased with the increase of depth except in summer. The range of soil denitrification rates were 002-425 ngN/(g·h) under Fatshedera lizei, 009-761 ngN/(g·h) under Rosa bracteata and 009-302 ngN/(g·h) under Cynodon dactylon. The mean denitrification rate of soil was the highest under Rosa bracteata (093 ngN/(g·h)), next under Fatshedera lizei (076 ngN/(g·h)), and smallest under Cynodon dactylon (054 ngN/(g·h)). The denitrification rates under different vegetations were all significantly higher at the 2-5 cm layer of soil than that at the other depths, and no significant difference was found between the denitrification rates at the soil layers of 12-15, 22-25 and 32-35 cm. As for the seasonal change, the denitrification rates in the 2-5 cm soil layer under Rosa bracteata and Fatshedera lizei were significantly higher in early spring than that in the other seasons, while soil at depth of 2-5 cm under Cynodon dactylon showed higher denitrification rates in spring and summer than early spring and autumn. There were no significant seasonal differences between the denitrification rates at the other three soil layers. The results of threeway analysis of variance (ANOVA) suggested that the denitrification rates in soil of urban riparian were significantly affected by single and combined factors of vegetation type, soil depth and season except the combined factor of vegetation type and depth. Results of Pearson correlation analysis showed that denitrification rates were extremely correlated (p<001) with SOC (r=049), soil NH4+ concentrations (r=069) and NO3- concentrations (r=0508) suggesting that the vegetation might affect denitrification rates by controlling soil physicochemical properties, but there were no significant correlations between denitrification rates and soil moisture content or temperature

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张昌顺,李 昆,马姜明,郑志新. 施肥对印楝人工林生长及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 329 .
[2] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[3] 赵 伟,谢德体,刘洪斌,. 重庆市景观格局动态变化分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 47 .
[4] 许素芳,周寅康. 开发区土地利用的可持续性评价及实践研究——以芜湖经济技术开发区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 453 -457 .
[5] 郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 曹李靖, 谢先军. 模糊数学在水质综合评价中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 83 -87 .
[6] 杨德伟,陈治谏,倪华勇,蒋 莉,廖晓勇. 基于能值分析的四川省生态经济系统可持续性评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 303 -309 .
[7] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[8] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[9] 白仙富,戴雨芡,史正涛. 拉市海流域胁迫因子及其影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 131 -136 .
[10] 霍 莉,王少平,郑丽波. 基于ArcGIS Engine的污染源数据库系统开发与应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 667 .