长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (02): 177-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201502001

• 区域可持续发展 •    下一篇

基于生态足迹的苏州市可持续发展动态研究

张佳琦, 段玉山, 伍燕南   

  1. (1.华东师范大学上海市地理教育教学研究基地,上海 200241; 2.华东师范大学地理科学学院,上海 200241; 3.苏州科技学院环境科学与工程学院,江苏 苏州 215009
  • 出版日期:2015-02-20

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN SUZHOU ON ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT

ZHANG Jiaqi1,2,3, DUAN Yushan2, WU Yannan3   

  1. (1.Shanghai Geography Education and Teaching Research Base, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241,China;2.College of Geographical Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241,China;3.School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009,China
  • Online:2015-02-20

摘要:

以苏州市为例,应用生态足迹分析法对苏州市1990~2010年生态足迹及生态承载力进行统计核算,并对苏州市可持续发展程度进行了定量研究和动态分析。研究结果表明,苏州市2010年人均生态足迹为648 hm2,人均生态承载力为027 hm2,人均生态赤字高达621 hm2,远远超出了目前的生态承载力,城市生态系统处于不可持续的发展状态。通过动态分析,结果显示苏州市的生态足迹不断增大,但增长速度正在变缓,生态承载力稳中有降,万元GDP生态足迹也在下降,这表明苏州市的资源利用率不断提高。提出了苏州市需尽快进行社会经济结构调整,控制人口增长,对耕地实行严格的保护,提高能源利用效率和降低能源消耗等措施,以减少生态赤字,促进社会经济可持续发展

Abstract:

Ecological footprint,as a measurement to estimate the status of sustainable development,reflects the degree of making use of the nature by humans. With the ecological footprint analysis theory advanced by William Rees, this article calculates the ecological footprint and ecological carrying capacity to research and analyze the sustainable development of Suzhou. According to the data of Suzhou Statistics Yearbook 1990-2010,the results show that the ecological footprint per capita of Suzhou was 648 hm2 in 2010,the ecological carrying capacity per capita was 027 hm2,the ecological deficit per capita was up to 621 hm2 in 2010 which is far beyond the current biocapacity. This means the urban ecological system is not sustainable now.There is contradiction between supply and demand of fossil fuel land, cultivated land, grassland and water, while construction land and woodland is slightly surplus. The deficit of fossil fuel land is up to 553 hm2 in 2010. The cultivated land and construction land provides more than 90% ecological supply for the city. The ratio reflects the large consumption of fossil fuel and it is in accordance with the economic development of Suzhou. Ecological footprint per capita of Suzhou is continued rising from 136 hm2 in 1990 to 648 hm2 in 2010. The average annual growth is 25.59% and increases most from 2000 to 2005. It turns slowly since 2005 because the city began to pay attention to the optimization of the industrial structure and improve the utilization rate of resources. The ecological footprint of Suzhou is much larger than the national and global average conditions. The ecological footprint of arable land is decreasing which is inconsistent with the increasing population and food consumption. It shows that Suzhou is increasingly dependent on imported food from the surroundings. The increase of construction land reflects the urbanization. The ecological capacity per capita steady decreases due to the reduction of cultivated land and the change of construction land. Thus, ecological deficit per capita is in accordance with the footprint. The city is in deficit condition since 1990, and sustainable development is the major problem that must be solved in the process of economic development in Suzhou. Analysis of energy resources consumption in Suzhou indicates that coal occupies the largest ecological footprint. The current energy structure has brought heavy pollution. Compared with relevant data in previous years, it is found that although the ecological footprint of Suzhou is increasing,the rate of growth is slowing and the ecological footprint of ten thousand yuan GDP is also declining. These means the utilization rate of resources is on the rise. Therefore, Suzhou should adjust the social and economic structure as soon as possible, control the growth of population, strictly protect the cultivated land, improve energy efficiency and cut down energy consumption, so as to reduce the ecological deficit and promote the social and economic sustainable development.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[3] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[5] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[6] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[7] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[8] 梁流涛, 曲福田, 王春华. 基于DEA方法的耕地利用效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 242 .
[9] 罗璐琴, 周敬宣, 李湘梅. 生态足迹动态预测模型构建与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 440 .
[10] 刘德富,黄钰铃,| 王从锋,. 水工学的发展趋势——从传统水工学到生态水工学[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 92 -96 .