三峡水库小江夏初水华暴发特征及原因分析

doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201511019

长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (11): 1944-1952.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201511019

三峡水库小江夏初水华暴发特征及原因分析

潘晓洁¹, 黄一凡², 郑志伟¹, 邹曦¹, 朱梦灵¹, 胡莲¹, 万成炎¹

1. 水利部中国科学院水工程生态研究所, 水利部水工程生态效应与生态修复重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430079;
2. 国务院三峡工程建设委员会水库管理司, 北京 100038

收稿日期:2014-08-25 修回日期:2015-05-07 出版日期:2015-11-20
通讯作者: 万成炎,E-mail:chywan@mail.ihe.ac.cn E-mail:chywan@mail.ihe.ac.cn
作者简介:潘晓洁(1980~),女,副研究员,博士,主要从事藻类环境生物学研究.E-mail:panxj2008@163.com
基金资助:
国家“十二五”科技支撑计划课题(2012BAC06B04)、三峡后续工作科研项目(2013HXKY2-3)和国家自然科学基金项目(51009100)资助

CHARACTERISTICS OF BLOOMS OUTBREAK CHARACTERISTICS AND ITS CAUSE ANALYSIS DURING EARLY SUMMER IN XIAOJIANG RIVER OF THREE GORGES RESERVOIR

PAN Xiao-jie¹, HUANG Yi-fan², ZHENG Zhi-wei¹, ZHOU Xi¹, ZHU Meng-ling¹, HU Lian¹, WAN Cheng-yan¹

1. Key Laboratory of Ecological Impacts of Hydraulic-Projects and Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystem of Ministry of Water Resources, Institute of Hydroecology, Ministry of Water Resources and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430079, China;
2. Reservoir management division in executive office of three gorges project construction committee state council of the People's Republic of China, Beijing 100038, China

Received:2014-08-25 Revised:2015-05-07 Online:2015-11-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 2013年5月对三峡水库小江回水区的水华发生过程进行了连续的动态监测与分析,以期了解水华过程中浮游植物群落结构的变化情况、小江夏初水华暴发特征及其主要的影响因素。期间共鉴定出浮游植物8门80属136种(含变种),以绿藻类为主(35属48种),蓝藻类(10属31种)和硅藻类(18属30种)次之,水华发生后期浮游植物及其蓝藻类的种类数少于初期和中期。浮游植物群落组成表现为蓝藻-绿藻型,且蓝藻门微囊藻占绝对优势,细胞丰度最高可达90%以上。浮游植物数量最高达10⁷cells/L以上,表层水体大于中层和底层水体。水华过程中,总氮处于重富营养水平,总磷处于轻-中富营养水平,不同水层的流速变化规律不同,其中中层与底层水体理化因子的变化特征基本一致,与表层水体有显著差异。冗余分析结果表明,浮游植物细胞总数与蓝藻数量及其微囊藻数量密切相关,与溶解氧、氮磷比等呈正相关,与总磷、流速等呈负相关,氮磷比及流速是水华发生的主要环境影响因素。

关键词: 三峡水库, 小江, 水华, 浮游植物, 影响因子

Abstract: Since the impoundment of Three Gorges Reservoir, Xiaojiang River has frequently occurred in the alternation of spring-summer and summer- autumn. Continuous monitoring bloom not only helps to understand the change characteristics of bloom and its influence factors, but also reflects the gradient change of water environment, which is important to understand the occurrence mechanism of bloom and the change status of the water quality. In order to understand phytoplankton community structure, blooms outbreak characteristics and their influencing factors during the progress of water bloom in early summer, the phytoplankton and physicochemical environment were monitored continuously in Xiaojiang River of Three Gorges Reservoir in May 2013. There were abundant phytoplankton with identified 136 phytoplankton species (including varieties) belong to 80 genera and 8 phyla. The main proposition of community was the species of chorophyta with identified 48 species belong to 35 genera. It was followed by the species of cyanophyta (31 species belong to 10 genera) and bacillariophyta (30 species belong to 10 genera). Comparing with the early and middle stages of water bloom, the terminal stage had less species number of phytoplankton and cyanophyta. The community of phytoplankton was characterized by cyanophyta and chorophyta during water bloom, and Microsystis were far superior numerically and the abundance up to more than 90%. The phytoplankton density could reach to 10⁷cells·L^-1, and the density of surface water was more than the middle and bottom water in the spatial distribution. For environmental factors, total nitrogen (TN) was in heavy eutrophic level and total phosphorus (TP) was in light-moderate eutrophic level, flow velocity (FV) was varied in different layers. The physicochemical factors in the middle layer were similar with the bottom, but had significant difference with surface. Redundancy analysis (RDA) on phytoplankton and environmental factors showed that the total cell density of phytoplankton was closely related to cyanophyta and microcystis, and they were positively related to dissolved oxygen (DO) and TN/TP, and negatively related to TP and FV. This revealed that TN/TP and FV played an important role during the occurrence of water bloom of Xiaojiang River.

Key words: Three Gorges Reservoir, Xiaojiang River, water bloom, phytoplankton, influencing factors

中图分类号:

潘晓洁, 黄一凡, 郑志伟, 邹曦, 朱梦灵, 胡莲, 万成炎. 三峡水库小江夏初水华暴发特征及原因分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(11): 1944-1952.

PAN Xiao-jie, HUANG Yi-fan, ZHENG Zhi-wei, ZHOU Xi, ZHU Meng-ling, HU Lian, WAN Cheng-yan. CHARACTERISTICS OF BLOOMS OUTBREAK CHARACTERISTICS AND ITS CAUSE ANALYSIS DURING EARLY SUMMER IN XIAOJIANG RIVER OF THREE GORGES RESERVOIR[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2015, 24(11): 1944-1952.

参考文献

[1] STONE R. Three Gorges Dam: into the unknown[J]. Science, 2008, 321(5889): 628-632.
[2] 孙志禹.三峡工程生态与环境保护[J].水力发电学报,2009,28(6):8-12.
[3] 国家环境保护总局.长江三峡工程生态与环境监测公报2004年[EB/OL].[2005-06-23].http:www.jcs.mep.gov.cn/hjzl/sxgb/2005sx.
[4] 中华人民共和国环境保护部.长江三峡工程生态与环境监测公报2013年[EB/OL].[2014-01-16].http:www.cnemc.cn/pulish/totalWebSite/news_39841.html
[5] 李哲,方芳,郭劲松,等.三峡小江回水区段2007年春季水华与营养盐特征[J].湖泊科学,2009,21(1):36-44.
[6] 刘威,彭文启,冯健,等.针对小江回水区水华现象的生态调度方案评估[J].南水北调与水利科技,2012,10(2):79-82,87.
[7] 章宗涉,黄祥飞.淡水浮游生物研究方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1991.
[8] 胡鸿钧,魏印心.中国淡水藻类——系统、分类及生态[M].北京:科学出版社,2006.
[9] 国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法(第四版)[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
[10] 李芳芳,董芳,段梦,等.大辽河水系夏季浮游植物群落结构特征及水质评价[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(11):2489-2496.
[11] 张玮,王为东,王丽卿,等.嘉兴石臼漾湿地冬季浮游植物群落结构特征[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(9):2431-2437.
[12] 潘晓洁,朱爱民,郑志伟,等.汉江中下游春季浮游植物群落结构特征及其影响因素[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(1):33-40.
[13] 沈韫芬,章宗涉,龚循矩,等.微型生物监测新技术[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1990.
[14] 钟海秀.漳泽水库的藻类植物及其营养型评价[D].太原:山西大学硕士学位论文,2004.
[15] 臧小平,吴国平,涂敏.长江流域湖泊水库水华防治对策[J].人民长江,2009,40(21):5-8.
[16] WHITTON B A, POTTS M. The ecology of cyanobacteria[M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
[17] 王朝晖,林秋奇,胡韧,等.广东省水库的蓝藻污染状况与水质评价[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2004,12(2):117-123.
[18] 郭劲松,张超,方芳,等.三峡水库小江回水区水华高发期浮游植物群落结构特征研究[J].科技导报,2008,26(17):70-75.
[19] 况琪军,马沛明,胡征宇,等.湖泊富营养化的藻类生物学评价与治理研究进展[J].安全与环境学报,2005,5(2):87-91.
[20] 郑丙辉,张远,富国,等.三峡水库营养状态评价标准研究[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(6):1022-1030.
[21] ROSSO J J, QUIRÓS R. Interactive effects of abiotic, hydrological and anthropogenic factors on fish abundance and distribution in natural run-of-the-river shallow lakes[J]. River Research and Applications, 2009, 25(6): 713-733.
[22] 何国全,韩博平.飞来峡水库蓄水初期浮游植物组成与数量的变化[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(6):657-662.
[23] 胡韧,雷腊梅,韩博平.南亚热带大型贫营养水库浮游植物群落结构与季节变化——以新丰江水库为例[J].生态学报,2008,28(10):4652-4664.
[24] 陈琼.氮、磷对水华发生的影响[J].生物学通报,2006,41(5):12-14.
[25] 许涛,王雨春,刘德富,等.三峡水库香溪河库湾夏季水华调查[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(3):646-652.
[26] 聂国朝.襄阳护城河水体中溶解氧含量研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(1):60-62,112.
[27] CIOFFI F, GALLERANO F. Response of lake piediluco to the change of hydrodynamic conditions and nutrient load reductions[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2000, 135(2/3): 199-229.
[28] FIGUEREDO C C, GIANI A. Seasonal variation in the diversity and species richness of phytoplankton in a tropical eutrophic reservoir[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2001, 445(1/3): 165-174.
[29] WU T F, LUO L C, QIN B Q, et al. A vertically integrated eutrophication model and its application to a river-style reservoir-Fuchunjiang, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2009, 21(3): 319-327.
[30] 杨敏,毕永红,艾鹰,等.人工控制条件下水流速对香溪河库湾浮游植物影响的初步研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(2):220-224.
[31] 马健荣,邓建明,秦伯强,等.湖泊蓝藻水华发生机理研究进展[J].生态学报,2013,33(10):3020-3030.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed