长江流域资源与环境 >> 2017, Vol. 26 >> Issue (02): 282-288.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201702014

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

苏皖交界河网区浮游植物群落结构及其与环境因子关系的研究

胡俊, 郑金秀, 池仕运, 董方勇   

  1. 水利部中国科学院水工程生态研究所, 水利部水工程生态效应与生态修复重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430079
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-17 修回日期:2016-10-09 出版日期:2017-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 董方勇,E-mail:dfy1008@mail.ihe.ac.an E-mail:dfy1008@mail.ihe.ac.an
  • 作者简介:胡俊(1977~),男,副研究员,主要从事水生态监测、生态评价方面研究.E-mail:jhu@mail.ihe.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(51409178);水利部“948”项目(201509)

STUDY ON PHYTOPLANKTON COMMUNITY AND ITS RELATIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS IN THE QINGYI/GUXI RIVER NETWORK

HU Jun, ZHENG Jin-xiu, CHI Si-yun, DONG Fang-yong   

  1. Key Laboratory of Ecological Impacts of Hydraulic-Projects and Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystem of Ministry of Water Resources, Institute of Hydroecology, Ministry of Water Resources and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430079, China
  • Received:2016-06-17 Revised:2016-10-09 Online:2017-02-20
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China (51409178);948 Project of the Ministry of Water Resources of China (201509)

摘要: 苏皖交界处的石臼湖是长江下游唯一的通江淡水湖,通过青弋江和姑溪河直接与长江相连,形成了复杂的河网水系。为探讨这种复杂的河网水系中浮游植物种群结构特征,2012年平水期和枯水期分别对石臼湖及其周边入湖支流进行了浮游植物调查,研究河网水系中河网与湖区浮游植物的种类组成、季节变化及与环境因子的关系。结果显示:共采集到浮游植物105种,平水期与枯水期种类数差别不大,两次调查均出现的种类约有70%相同;浮游植物丰度最高可达1×;108 cell/L,达到了水华暴发的标准。优势种类主要绿藻门和蓝藻门为主,但是从生物量来看硅藻门占优。排序分析显示河网区域浮游植物季节演替明显,且河网与湖区浮游植物群落结构差异明显,进一步分析则表明影响浮游植物主要的环境因子是氮、磷等营养元素。

关键词: 石臼湖, 浮游植物, 群落结构, 河网, 环境因子

Abstract: Shijiu Lake is the sole freshwater lake connected to the Yangtze River through the Qingyi River and the Guxi River, forming a complex drainage network. To explore the phytoplankton community structure in this complex river network, an investigation was carried out in the normal season and the dry seasons in 2012 on the phytoplankton in Shijiu lake and its surrounding tributaries. In this investigation, the species composition, seasonal variation and its relationship with environmental factors was analyzed. The results showed that a total of 105 species of phytoplankton were collected. There was no obvious difference in the number of species between the normal season and the dry season, with 70% species shared; the abundance of phytoplankton was at most 1×108 cell/L, reaching the standards of the water bloom. The dominant taxa were chlorophyta and cyanobacteria, but the diatom is dominant in biomass. The direct ordination analysis furtherly showed the seasonal succession of phytoplankton was obvious in the river network and the lake area, and the main environmental factors affecting phytoplankton were the nutrients including the nitrogen and phosphorus.

Key words: Shijiu Lake, phytoplankton, community structure, river network, environmental factor

中图分类号: 

  • P209
[1] 潘国权, 王水, 赵凯. 石臼湖生态现状及面临的主要问题[J]. 污染防治技术, 2015, 28(2):23-27.[PAN G Q, WANG S, ZHAO K. The ecological condition at present and the main problems faced by Shijiu Lake[J]. Pollution Control Technology, 2015, 28(2):23-27.]
[2] 王荣娟, 张金池. 石臼湖湿地生态系统健康评价[J]. 林业科技开发, 2011, 25(2):70-74.[WANG R J, ZHANG J C. Assessment of wetland ecosystem health in Shijiu Lake[J]. China Forestry Science and Technology, 2011, 25(2):70-74.]
[3] 李冬玲, 任全进, 张守堂, 等. 石臼湖、固城湖地区水生植被资源的合理利用[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2003, 30(2):27-29.[LI D L, REN Q J, ZHANG S T, et al. The use of aquatic vegetation resources from Shijiu Lake and Gucheng Lake[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2003, 30(2):27-29. (请核对英文标题)]
[4] 郑金秀, 池仕运, 李聃, 等. 石臼湖原生动物种群分布及其同质化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(4):1052-1059.[ZHENG J X, CHI S Y, LI D, et al. Protozoan population distribution and its homogeneity in Shijiu Lake[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(4):1052-1059.]
[5] 于忠华, 刘海滨, 张涨. 石臼湖流域江苏段生态环境驱动因素分析[J]. 水资源保护, 2010, 26(6):70-74.[YU Z H, LIU H B, ZHANG Z. Eco-environmental driving factors analysis and countermeasures in Jiangsu section of Shijiu Lake Basin[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2010, 26(6):70-74.]
[6] 王荣娟, 张金池. 石臼湖湿地水环境质量评价及富营养化状况研究[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2011, 7(2):26-28.[WANG R J, ZHANG J C. Water quality assessment and status of eutrophication in Shijiu Wetland[J]. Wetland Science & Management, 2011, 7(2):26-28.]
[7] 朱爱民, 胡菊香, 李嗣新, 等. 三峡水库长江干流及其支流枯水期浮游植物多样性与水质[J]. 湖泊科学, 2013, 25(3):378-385.[ZHU A M, HU J X, LI S X, et al. Phytoplankton diversity and water quality in the main stream and tributaries of Three Gorges Reservoir region of Yangtze River during dry seasons[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2013, 25(3):378-385.]
[8] 胡鸿钧. 中国淡水藻类[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 1980.
[9] 胡鸿钧, 魏印心. 中国淡水藻类——系统、分类及生态[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2006.[HU H J, WEI Y X. The Freshwater Algae of China-Systematics, Taxonomy and Ecology[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2006.]
[10] 国家环境保护总局. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 4版. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
[11] TER BRAAK C J F, ŠMILAUER P. Canoco Reference Manual and User's Guide:Software for Ordination (Version 5.0)[M]. Ithaca, NY, USA:Microcomputer Power, 2012.
[12] ALLISON P D. Multiple Regression:A Primer[M]. California:Pine Forge Press, 1999.
[13] 李颖, 施择, 张榆霞, 等. 关于用藻密度对蓝藻水华程度进行分级评价的方法和运用[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2014(2):67-68.[LI Y, SHI Z, ZHANG Y X, et al. Evaluation method and application on cyanobacteria bloom degree classification with algal density[J]. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2014(2):67-68.]
[14] 王丽, 魏伟, 周平, 等. 铜陵市河流冬季浮游植物群落结构及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(1):243-250.[WANG L, WEI W, ZHOU P, et al. Phytoplankton's community structure and its relationships with environmental factors in the rivers of Tongling City, Anhui Province of East China in winter[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(1):243-250.]
[15] WANG X L, LU Y L, HE G Z, et al. Exploration of relationships between phytoplankton biomass and related environmental variables using multivariate statistic analysis in a eutrophic shallow lake:a 5-year study[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2007, 19(8):920-927.
[16] 庞清江, 李白英. 东平湖水体富营养化评价[J]. 水资源保护, 2003, 19(5):42-44.[PANG Q J, LI B Y. Assessment of eutrophication of Dongping Lake water body[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2003, 19(5):42-44.]
[17] 郑金秀, 陈明秀, 胡菊香. 苏皖交界河网区后生浮游动物群落结构及其影响因子分析[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2014, 35(6):53-60.[ZHENG J X, CHEN M X, HU J X. Characterization of zooplankton community structure and environmental factors in the Qingyi/Guxi River network[J]. Journal of Hydroecology, 2014, 35(6):53-60.]
[18] 郑金秀, 池仕运, 李聃, 等. 富营养化对浅水湖泊轮虫种群结构影响研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(12):1964-1971.[ZHENG J X, CHI S Y, LI D, et al. Impact of eutrophication on rotifer community structure in shallow lakes[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2014, 23(12):1964-1971.]
[19] 况琪军, 马沛明, 胡征宇, 等. 湖泊富营养化的藻类生物学评价与治理研究进展[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2005, 5(2):87-91.[KUANG Q J, MA P M, HU Z Y, et al. Study on the evaluation and treatment of lake eutrophication by means of algae biology[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2005, 5(2):87-91.]
[20] MAGURRAN A E. Measuring Biological Diversity[M]. Malden, MA:Blackwell Science Ltd, 2004.
[21] 马健荣, 邓建明, 秦伯强, 等. 湖泊蓝藻水华发生机理研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(10):3020-3030.[MA J R, DENG J M, QIN B Q, et al. Progress and prospects on cyanobacteria bloom-forming mechanism in lakes[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(10):3020-3030.]
[22] 叶琳琳, 张民, 孔繁翔, 等. 水生生态系统蓝藻固氮作用研究进展与展望[J]. 湖泊科学, 2014, 26(1):9-18.[YE L L, ZHANG M, KONG F X, et al. Progress and prospect of research on cyanobacteria nitrogen fixing in aquatic ecosystem[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2014, 26(1):9-18.]
[23] 张胜花, 常军军, 孙珮石. 水体藻类磷代谢及藻体磷矿化研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2013, 22(7):1250-1254.[ZHANG S H, CHANG J J, SUN P S. Phosphorus cycle of algae during its growth and death process:phosphorus uptake and release[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2013, 22(7):1250-1254.]
[1] 潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529-2539.
[2] 李贲, 张伟, 束潇潇, 莫英敏, 裴恩乐, 袁晓, 王天厚. 上海郊区三类典型生境的两栖类分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 824-831.
[3] 杨洋, 张玮, 潘宏博, 顾琬雯, 郝瑞娟, 熊春晖, 王丽卿. 滆湖轮虫群落结构及其与水环境因子的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 832-840.
[4] 李云良, 姚静, 张小琳, 张奇. 鄱阳湖水体垂向分层状况调查研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 915-924.
[5] 田凯, 汪正祥, 雷耘, 李中强, 潘磊, 李亭亭. 鄂西北六个自然保护区鱼类群落结构及多样性比较[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 384-393.
[6] 周峰, 吕慧华, 许有鹏. 城镇化下平原水系变化及河网连通性影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 402-409.
[7] 靳士科, 王娟娟, 朱莎, 张琪, 黎翔, 郑文静, 由文辉. 上海城区六种林地凋落物中土壤动物群落结构[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(Z1): 1-8.
[8] 郭弘艺, 张旭光, 唐文乔, 李辉华, 沈林宏, 周天舒, 刘东. 长江靖江段刀鲚捕捞量的时间变化及相关环境因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1850-1859.
[9] 汤勇, 张薇, 薛俊增, 陈立婧. 长江口大洋山近岸水域浮游植物群落及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1176-1183.
[10] 李文浩, 张萌, 门吉帅, 敖雪夫, 胡新艳, 欧阳珊, 吴小平. 江西仙女湖流域大型底栖动物群落结构及水质评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1218-1227.
[11] 于雪, 濮励杰, 许艳, 朱明. 1980~2010年江苏沿海城市土地利用变化及其与环境因子关系分析——以东台市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 537-543.
[12] 刘凯, 段金荣, 徐东坡, 周彦锋, 徐跑. 怀洪新河太湖新银鱼国家级水产种质资源保护区生境及渔业群落多样性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(03): 395-403.
[13] 钱红, 严云志, 储玲, 朱仁, 高俊峰, 蔡永久. 巢湖流域河流鱼类群落的时空分布[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 257-264.
[14] 何勇凤, 李昊成, 王旭歌, 朱永久, 杨德国. 长湖鱼类群落结构的时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 265-273.
[15] 周峰, 吕慧华, 许有鹏. 城镇化平原河网区下垫面特征变化及洪涝影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(12): 2094-2099.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨 选. 国内外典型水治理模式及对武汉水治理的借鉴[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 584 .
[2] 李恒鹏,杨桂山,刘晓玫,万荣荣. 流域土地利用变化的长周期水文效应及管理策略[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 450 -455 .
[3] 廖顺宝,李泽辉. 四川省人口分布与土地利用的关系及人口数据空间化试验[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 557 -561 .
[4] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[5] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[6] 邹小兵,曾 婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[7] 董林水, 张旭东, 周金星, 李冬雪. 青藏铁路沿线北段植被物种丰富度及盖度的动态变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 551 .
[8] 胡贤辉,张 霞,杨钢桥. 湖北省土地利用结构变化及其驱动机制分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 43 .
[9] 张 征,李 今,梁 威,吴振斌. 拟除虫菊酯杀虫剂对水生态系统的毒性作用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 125 -130 .
[10] 赵沁娜 徐启新. 城市土地置换过程中土壤多环芳烃污染的健康风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 286 -290 .