长江流域资源与环境 >> 2018, Vol. 27 >> Issue (09): 1967-1977.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201809008

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于GIS的中国城市房地产泡沫的空间传染性分析——以2006~2014年35个大中城市为例

韦汝虹1,2,金  李2,3,方  达2,3*   

  1. (1.南京理工大学经济管理学院,江苏 南京 210094;2.北京大学光华管理学院,北京 100871;3.东南大学土木与城市工程系,江苏 南京 210018)
  • 出版日期:2018-09-20 发布日期:2018-11-01

Study on the Spatial Infection of Real Estate Market Bubble Based on GIS in China: Case Study of 35 Metropolises in 2006 and 2014

WEI Ru-hong,JIN Li,FANG Da   

  1. (1.Nanjing University of Science and Technology School of Economice and Management,Nanjing 210094,China;2.Peking University Guanghua School of Management,Beijing 100871,China;3.Southeast University School of Civil Engineering,Nanjing 210018,China)
  • Online:2018-09-20 Published:2018-11-01

摘要:  关于房地产泡沫空间传染性的研究议题,已有经济学模型存在一定的局限性,不能够有效地细致地展开探讨。以中国大中城市为例,基于GIS的空间计量模型对中国城市房地产泡沫的空间传染性进行分析。结果表明:中国房地产泡沫具有空间传染性,且在时间尺度上,传染能力具有明显增强的趋势,在空间尺度上,传染能力表现为由东部沿海向西北内陆逐渐递减的空间趋势。(2)2006年,北京、上海、广州等城市成为了中国房地产泡沫的空间传染源;2014年,传染源发生了明显转移,广州等城市成为了空间传染源。(3)在中国经济进入新常态的背景之下,需要有层次地采取相关措施,以有效遏制房地产市场引起的经济泡沫,以免阻碍地区经济转型和产业升级。

Abstract: It is widely agreed that the spatial infection of real estate bubble exists in China. However, it is difficult to further investigate the issue in detail by using economic methods. To demonstrate spatial infection of real estate market bubble from perspective of geography in China, we conduct a case study of 35 metropolises by developing the method of symbolic vector data, spatial autocorrelation models, and spatial interpolation model based on GIS. The results indicate that the spatial infection of real estate bubble exists between Chinese cities. Moreover, its spatial infection capability becomes stronger than before. And the capability has a hierarchy decrease from the eastern areas to northwestern areas in China. Secondly, three source cities of infection (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou) is identified in 2006, but only Guangzhou is identified in 2014. It suggests that a spatial transfer of source cities of infection has happened in recent years. Finally, the government should adopt some hierarchy strategies to stop the spatial infection of real estate bubble between Chinese cities under the background of “new normal” economic.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 栾青杉, 孙军. 2005年秋季长江口及其邻近水域浮游植物群集[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(2): 202 .
[2] 刘毅, 陶勇, 万开元, 张过师, 陈树森, 陈防. 丹江口库区坡耕地柑桔园不同覆盖方式下地表径流氮磷流失特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(11): 1340 .
[3] 胡传林, 万成炎, 吴生桂, 丁庆秋, 潘磊. 蓝藻水华的成因及其生态控制进展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(12): 1471 .
[4] 凡非得| 王克林 | 宣 勇 | 岳跃民. 西南喀斯特区域生态环境敏感性评价及其空间分布[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(11): 1394 .
[5] 周 峰|许有鹏|吕慧华. 基于MODIS-EVI数据的长江三角洲地区植被变化的特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(11): 1363 .
[6] 吕 文 |杨桂山 |万荣荣. 不同植茶年龄茶园蒸散速率的日变化——以宜兴市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(11): 1370 .
[7] 冯立新|杨效忠. 基于陆路交通网络的跨界旅游区可达性测度及空间格局优化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(8): 1172 .
[8] 邓晓军| 韩龙飞| 杨明楠| 于志慧| 张媛. 城市水足迹对比分析——以上海和重庆为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(02): 189 .
[9] 刘聚涛,钟家有,付敏,吴涛. 鄱阳湖流域农村生活区面源污染特征及其影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(07): 970 .
[10] 吴颖超,王震,曹磊,赵言文. 基于GIS和PSR的江苏省水土流失易发区划分研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(04): 690 .