长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (03): 577-585.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201903008

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于InVEST模型的岷江上游生态系统水源涵养量与价值评估

刘  菊1,2,3,傅  斌3,张成虎1,2,胡治鹏1,2,王玉宽3*   

  1. (1.广西师范学院北部湾环境演变与资源利用教育部重点实验室,广西 南宁 530001;2.广西师范学院广西地表过程与智能模拟重点实验室,广西 南宁 530001;3.中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川 成都 610041)
  • 出版日期:2019-03-20 发布日期:2019-03-22

Assessment of Ecosystem Water Retention and Its Value in the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River Based on InVEST Model

LIU Ju1,2,3, FU Bin 3, ZHANG Cheng-hu 1,2, HU Zhi-peng 1,2, WANG Yu-kuan 3   

  1. (1. Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf (Ministry of Education), Guangxi Teachers Education University, Nanning 530001, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Process and Intelligent Simulation, Guangxi Teachers Education University, Nanning 530001, China;3. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China)
  • Online:2019-03-20 Published:2019-03-22

摘要: 岷江上游是中国长江上游生态屏障的重要组成部分,更是成都平原的重要水源生命线,该文使用InVEST模型与影子工程法,对其生态系统水源涵养量与价值进行量化评估与空间制图,可为当地水源地保护与生态补偿机制的建立提供依据。结果表明:岷江上游小流域水源涵养量多年平均值为219.36 mm,总量为49.19亿m 3,价值为40.83亿元,并且存在明显的空间差异,高值区主要分布在汶川中南部,低值区多集中在松潘县与茂县境内。受评估方法的限制,不同学者对该流域的相关研究结果差异较大,可比性较差,但是岷江上游生态系统具有巨大的水源涵养价值。空间化评估结果可直观的反映水源涵养量与价值的空间差异,在流域生态补偿机制构建、补偿效益分析等方面具有重要应用价值。

Abstract: The upper reaches of Minjiang River is not only an important part of the ecological barrier in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River, but also a vital water source lifeline for the Chengdu plain. InVEST model and shadow engineering method were used to assess the ecosystem water retention and its value in the upper reaches of Minjiang River, and this work had important significance for water conservation planning and establishment of payment for ecosystem service mechanism. The results showed that the average annual water retention amount of sub watersheds in the upper reaches of Minjiang River was 219.36 mm, the total water retention amount was 49.19 billion m 3 and the water retention value was 4.083 billion Yuan. Water retention amount and its value in our study area displayed some obvious spatial variation with high value areas mainly distributed in south central Wenchuan County and low value areas relatively concentrated in the regions of Songpan and Maoxian County. Due to the limitation of the evaluation method, the relevant findings of this watershed were obviously different and had poor comparability. However, it is sure that the upper reaches of the Minjiang River has huge water retention value. The quantitative assessment results and mapping can directly reflected the spatial variation in water retention and its value. It had strong applied value in the establishment of payment for ecosystem service mechanism and compensation efficiency analysis etc.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏显虎,杜 耘,Yasunori NAKAYAMA,薛怀平,任宪友. 基于RS/GIS的四湖地区湖泊水域百年变迁研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3): 293 -297 .
[2] 董林水, 张旭东, 周金星, 李冬雪. 青藏铁路沿线北段植被物种丰富度及盖度的动态变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 551 .
[3] 张 征,李 今,梁 威,吴振斌. 拟除虫菊酯杀虫剂对水生态系统的毒性作用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 125 -130 .
[4] 张天宇, 范莉, 孙杰, 何永坤, 董新宁, 任永建. 1961~2008年三峡库区气候变化特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(z1): 52 .
[5] 赵永晶| 刘学勤. 巢湖水向湖滨带底栖动物群落结构研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(Z2): 30 .
[6] 涂洁|刘琪璟|王辉民|廖迎春|李燕燕. 江西千烟洲木荷液流特征及其与气象因子的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(02): 267 .
[7] 李一曼, 修春亮. 浙江省陆路交通可达性与经济社会协调性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(06): 751 .
[8] 王雷宏,黄庆丰,蒲发光,周美生,陆发存. 天马自然保护区大别山五针松与群落中优势种的种间关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(07): 918 .
[9] 龚志军, 李艳, 张敏, 蔡永久, 薛庆举, 许浩. 大型浅水湖泊太湖霍甫水丝蚓次级生产力的研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(12): 2054 -2060 .
[10] 曾胜兰, 王雅芳. 成都地区污染天气分型及其污染气象特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(Z1): 59 -67 .