长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (05): 1214-1224.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201905021

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

近61年来长江荆南三口水系连通性演变特征

李景保,于丹丹,张瑞,杨波,代稳,何蒙,徐志   

  1. (湖南师范大学资源与环境科学学院,湖南 长沙 410081)
  • 出版日期:2019-05-20 发布日期:2019-05-22

Evolution Characteristics of River Network of the Three Estuaries of Southern Jing River in the Past 61 Years

LI Jing-bao, YU Dan-dan, ZHANG Rui,YANG Bo, DAI Wen, HE Meng, XU Zhi   

  1. (College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081,China)
  • Online:2019-05-20 Published:2019-05-22

摘要: 基于1955~2016年不同时期的长江荆南三口水系相关数据,从水系水力连通性强度、水系连通度和水系连通性水平三视角分析研究区水系连通变化过程。结果表明:2016年与1955年相比,(1)区域的水文连通性呈现下降的趋势,但变化幅度不大;(2)水系连通环度α、节点连接率β、水系连通度γ分别减少了45.45%、10.8%、8.46%,节点连接率β下降得最为明显;(3)基于水系自然社会功能的水系连通性(E)和基于水流阻力与水文过程(F)这两种水系连通性评价方法,联合评价了荆南三口水系连通性,两种结果均显示,研究区水系连通性均呈下降趋势,由1955年的0.2367和0.3434依次下降到2016年的0.1588、0.2517。该研究可为该地区实施河湖水系连通工程,修复河流生态系统提供理论参考。

Abstract: Based on the data of river network of the Southern Jing river in different period from 1955 to 2016, the changing process of river network connectivity was studied from three aspects: strength of river system and hydraulic connectivity, river network connectivity and level of river network connection. Results show that comparing with 1955, in 2016, (1) the hydrological connectivity demonstrated a decrease trend but with moderate changes; (2) the circuitry of river network connectivity α, node-connection rate β, and river network connectivity γ were all decreased by 45.45%, 10.80% and 8.46%, respectively, of which the node-connection rate β demonstrated the most significant trend; (3) based on two methods evaluating the river network connectivity (e.g. ① E: river network connectivity with respect to the natural and social functions of river network, and ② F: river network connectivity with respect to the hydrological process and flow resistance) the river network connectivity of the three outlets of Southern Jing river has been collectively evaluated. Both of the results derived from the two individual method show that river network connectivity in the study area presented a downtrend that decreased from 0.2367 and 0.3434 in 1955 to 0.1588 and 0.2517 in 2016, respectively. The results of this article could be theoretical references for both river network or lake connectivity recovery projects and riverine ecological system restoration.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李中强, 王双玲, 杨梅, 徐. 基于生态敏感性分析的湖泊保护与利用——以湖北省斧头湖为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 714 .
[2] 陈姗姗, 束炯, 徐建中. 中国若干典型城市对流层NO2时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(12): 1484 .
[3] 杨 乐|逯 非,王效科|段晓男|孙滨峰|欧阳志云. 三峡水库上空甲烷浓度时空变化及与水库甲烷通量的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(02): 209 .
[4] 孔 翔|郑汝楠. 外向型加工制造基地的特色创新体系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(5): 544 .
[5] 黄红铸 |崔玉娟 |叶 瑜 |方修琦. 江浙沪地区历史重大洪涝灾害情景下的人口和GDP物理暴露量分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(06): 801 .
[6] 李 博,唐世浩. 基于TRMM卫星资料分析三峡蓄水前后的局地降水变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(05): 617 .
[7] 戴其文,彭瑜,刘澈元,翟禄新. 猫儿山自然保护区生态受益者支付意愿及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(07): 911 .
[8] 王 骏,丁明涛,庙 成,周 鹏,黄 英. 基于GIS和AHP的芦山地震灾区泥石流危险性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(11): 1580 .
[9] 何明琼, 王丽娟, 付佳, 张振武. 2014年1月沪渝高速公路汉宜段一次大雾个例分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 573 -579 .
[10] 张玉柱, 黄春长, 庞奖励, 查小春, 周亚利, 石彬楠, 李晓刚. 基于HEC-RAS模型的汉江上游旬阳西段超长尺度古水文演化重建[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 755 -764 .