长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (4): 1040-1050.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202004024

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    

激励与约束如何影响农户生物农药施用行为——兼论约束措施的调节作用

沈昱雯1,2,罗小锋1,2*,余威震1,2   

  1. (1.华中农业大学经济管理学院,湖北 武汉 430070;2.湖北农村发展研究中心,湖北 武汉 430070)
  • 出版日期:2020-04-20 发布日期:2020-06-12

How Incentives and Constraints Affect Farmers’ Biological Pesticide Application Behavior:Concurrently Discussing the Regulating Effect of Restraint Measures

SHEN Yu-wen1,2,LUO Xiao-feng1,2,YU Wei-zhen1,2   

  1. (1.College of Economics&Management,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,China;2. Hubei Rural Development Research Center,Wuhan 430070,China)
  • Online:2020-04-20 Published:2020-06-12

摘要: 摘要: 农业的绿色发展依赖于农户生产行为的绿色化转变,这一转变不仅与农户自身、家庭等内在因素有关,还受外在因素的激励与约束。基于湖北省719户农户的调查数据,根据农户追求利益和损失厌恶的特征,将农户在生产过程中面对的外在激励与约束纳入一个框架,探讨了激励与约束措施对农户施用生物农药这一绿色生产行为的影响以及约束措施的调节作用。结果表明:(1)价格激励、技术培训、政策补贴的正向刺激和生产监管、处罚的反向规制均能对农户生物农药施用行为产生显著正向影响;(2)价格激励的影响效果最大,处罚约束次之,随后是技术培训、政策补贴,而生产监管的作用最小;(3)约束措施能在一定程度上调节激励措施对农户施用生物农药的影响,且在不同的激励与约束措施下,调节作用的方向不同,生产监管、处罚力度正向调节价格激励的作用,市场监管正向调节技术培训的作用,而生产监管却削弱了技术培训原有的效果。因此,在促进农户施用生物农药和绿色生产时,要做到激励与约束并重,并对激励与约束措施进行合理搭配,放大激励与约束的协同作用。

Abstract: Abstract:The green development of agriculture depends on the green transformation of farmers’ production behavior, which is not only related to the internal factors of farmers themselves and their families, but also stimulated and restrained by external factors. Based on the survey data of 719 farmers in Hubei province, and according to the characteristics of farmers’ pursuit of interests and loss aversion, this paper puts the external incentives and constraints faced by peasant households in the production process into a framework, discussing the influence of incentive and constraint measures on the green production behavior of farmers applying biological pesticide and the regulating effect of constraint measures. The findings are as follows: first, the positive stimulation of price incentive, technical training and policy subsidies, and the negative regulation of production supervision and punishment can significantly affect the production behavior of farmers and improve the possibility of farmers' application of biological pesticide.Second, price incentive has the greatest effect, followed by punishment and restraint, technical training and policy subsidies, and production supervision has the least effect. Third, restraint measures can adjust the influence of incentive measures on farmers' application of biological pesticide to a certain extent, and the direction of regulating effect is different under different incentive and restrictive measures. Production supervision and policy punishment positively regulate the role of price incentives, market supervision positively regulate the role of technical training, while production supervision has weakened the original effect of technical training. Therefore, we should attach equal importance to incentives and constraints when promoting green production of farmers, and make a reasonable combination of incentives and constraints to enlarge the synergistic effect of incentives and constraints.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李中强, 王双玲, 杨梅, 徐. 基于生态敏感性分析的湖泊保护与利用——以湖北省斧头湖为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 714 .
[2] 郑玉雯,薛伟贤,王 萌. 基于SBM动态网络模型的中国高新区效率评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(01): 31 .
[3] 吴浪, 周廷刚, 温莉, 刘晓璐, 朱晓波. 基于遥感数据的PM2.5与城市化的时空关系研究——以成渝城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2142 -2152 .
[4] 马小亮, 刘桂民, 吴晓东, 徐海燕, 叶琳琳, 张晓兰. 三江源高寒草甸下溪流溶解性有机碳的季节性输移特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2387 -2394 .
[5] 周晟吕, 李月寒, 胡 静, 封竞男. 基于问卷调查的上海市大气环境质量改善的支付意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2419 -2424 .
[6] 苏 芳, 郑亚萍, 阚立娜, 蔡 莎. 基于CVM调查法评估城市公共绿地服务价值 ——以西部省会城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2434 -2442 .
[7] 朱立一, 何伟, 朱璧然, . 纳米二氧化硅和铅复合暴露对 斑马鱼幼鱼甲状腺内分泌系统的毒性影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2588 -2596 .
[8] 屈小娥. 中国生态效率的区域差异及影响因素——基于时空差异视角的实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2673 -2683 .
[9] 胡兴坤, 高 雷, 杨 浩, 刘绍平, 陈大庆, 段辛斌 . 长江中游黄石江段鱼类早期资源现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 60 -67 .
[10] 胡晓, 余英俊, 魏永才, 洪亮, 张永年, 石小涛, 吴睿. 基于过鱼效果评估的涵洞鱼道堰式挡板性能研究与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 134 -143 .