长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (6): 1445-1453.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202006018

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

川北典型小流域产流对降雨的多时间尺度响应规律

龚珏 1,杜洪勋 2,郑江坤 1,张健全 2, 况治宇 2,张云奇 1   

  1. (1. 四川农业大学林学院水土保持与荒漠化防治四川省高校重点实验室,四川 成都 611130;
    2. 升钟水土保持试验站,四川 南充 637388)
  • 出版日期:2020-06-20 发布日期:2020-07-20

Response of Runoff to Rainfall in Multi-time Scale of Typical Small Watershed in Northern Sichuan Province

GONG Jue 1, DU Hong-xun 2, ZHENG Jiang-kun 1, ZHANG Jian-quan 2, KUANG Zhi-yu 2, ZHANG Yun-qi 1   

  1. (1. Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Combating of Colleges and Universities, College
    of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130,China ; 2.Soil and Water
    Conservation Experimental Station in Shengzhong, Nanchong 637388, China)
  • Online:2020-06-20 Published:2020-07-20

摘要: 摘要: 为了解川北深丘区典型小流域河川径流动态变化规律,以嘉陵江李子口小流域为研究对象,基于2005~2016年的降雨、径流等实测数据,采用相关分析、降雨弹性系数、流量历时曲线等方法探讨了径流对降雨的响应规律。结果表明:(1)径流深和降雨量年际差异性均较大,整体呈不明显上升趋势,径流深的上升幅度略小于降雨量;(2)降雨量和径流深年内分布极不均匀,6~9月分别占年值的67.4%和78.5%,夏季易产生洪涝灾害;(3)极丰水流量、平水流量和极枯水流量分别为2.9、0.2、0.01 m3/s。极丰水事件通常由长历时暴雨导致;极枯水日则多因长期无降雨或仅少量降雨;(4)典型次降雨中,暴雨、大雨、中雨的流量过程线从尖瘦型转变为平坦型,流量峰值滞后时间依次为1.5、3.67、5 h,滞后时间随着次降雨量的减小而变长,流量过程线的增长幅度随着次降雨量减小而变小。综上,径流和降雨在各时间尺度上均呈极显著相关(P<0.01),不同时间尺度响应规律表现出较大的差异性。

Abstract: Abstract:In order to understand surface runoff in deep hilly region of northern of Sichuan province, Lizikou catchment acted as the research area in Jialing River watershed. Based on the observed rainfall and runoff data from 2005 to 2016, correlation analysis, elastic coefficient of precipitation and flow duration curve applied to reveal the change regularity and correlation between rainfall and runoff. The results were as followed: (1) Annual precipitation and runoff was uneven distribution under inter-annual scale. The increase tendency of precipitation and runoff was not significant. The increase tendency of runoff is less than that of rainfall. (2) The monthly distribution of rainfall and runoff is extremely uneven. From June to September, the rainfall and runoff depth accounted for 67.4% and 78.5% of that in whole year, respectively. As a result, it prone to flooding in summer. (3) Extremely high flows, normal flows and extremely low flows were 2.9, 0.2 and 0.01 m 3/s, respectively. Extremely high flows caused by prolonged rainstorm. Normal flows often emerged during no rainfall in the wet year or during the heavy rain and rainstorm in the dry year. Extremely low flows were mostly due to no rainfall or only a small amount of rainfall. (4) In the typical individual rainfall, the flow during curve under heavy rain, moderate rain and light rain transferred from sharp-thin to flat. The lag times for peak flow ware 1.5 h, 3.67 h and 5 h for light rain, moderate rain and heavy rain, respectively, which became longer with the decrease of rainfall. Peak flow became lower with the decrease of rainfall. All in all, the correlation between rainfall and runoff is extremely significant in yearly, monthly, and daily (P<0.01). There are great differences among different time scales.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄余春 |田 昆 |岳海涛 |刘朝蓬 |赖建东. 筑坝蓄水过程对高原湿地拉市海湖滨植被的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(10): 1197 .
[2] 陈彬, 于秀波, 刘宇. 基于中低分辨率遥感影像的分类方法对比研究——以鄱阳湖水鸟栖息地遥感分类为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(11): 1834 -1842 .
[3] 李丹, 郭生练, 洪兴骏, 郭靖. 汉江流域1960~2014年降雨极值时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1448 -1456 .
[4] 张英浩, 陈江龙, 程 钰. 环境规制对中国区域绿色经济效率的影响机理研究——基于超效率模型和空间面板计量模型实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2407 -2418 .
[5] 刘金科, 韩贵琳, 阳昆桦, 柳满. 九龙江流域河水溶解态碳的时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2578 -2587 .
[6] 周惠, 赵微, 汪飞腾. 农地整理后期管护制度绩效研究:影响路径及中介效应分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2629 -2639 .
[7] 盖豪 颜廷武 何可 张俊飚. 社会嵌入视角下农户保护性耕作技术采用行为研究——基于冀、皖、鄂三省668份农户调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[8] 田效琴, 贾会娟, 熊瑛, 石超, 王龙昌, 黄召存, 陈娇, 邢毅. 保护性耕作下蚕豆生育期土壤有机碳、氮含量变化与分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1132 -1141 .
[9] 孙 伟, 陈 雯, 刘崇刚, . 太湖流域水敏性与建设用地扩张的关联评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(07): 1575 -1582 .
[10] 程琳琳, 张俊飚, 何可. 网络嵌入与风险感知对农户绿色耕作技术采纳行为的影响分析——基于湖北省615个农户的调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(07): 1736 -1746 .