长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (1): 97-110.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202101010

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

跨区域流域生态补偿标准核算——基于成本收益双视角

倪  琪1,徐  涛2,李晓平1,刘霁瑶1,赵敏娟1*   

  1. (1.西北农林科技大学经济管理学院,陕西 杨凌 712100;2.海南大学管理学院,海南 海口 570228)
  • 出版日期:2021-01-20 发布日期:2021-02-04

Transboundary River Basin Ecological Compensation Standard Accounting: Based on Cost-Benefit Perspective

NI Qi 1,XU Tao 2,LI Xiao-ping 1,LIU Ji-yao 1,ZHAO Min-juan1   

  1. (1.College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China;2. School of Management, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)
  • Online:2021-01-20 Published:2021-02-04

摘要: 合理的补偿标准是流域生态补偿的核心,也是激励生态系统服务提供者积极性、体现生态系统服务改善价值、实现区域协同发展的关键内容。基于成本收益双视角,以渭河流域为例,运用全成本法和选择实验法测算了流域生态系统服务保护的成本收益,进一步借助鲁宾斯坦议价模型核算跨区域生态补偿标准。结果表明:(1)为改善流域生态环境,上游甘肃省的直接治理成本约为 35 021.27 万元/a,间接成本约为 107 112.26 万元/a,全成本约为 142 133.53 万元/a;(2)流域生态系统服务改善能够为中下游陕西省带来的收益为 252 912.96 万元;(3)在流域生态系统服务保护成本收益明确的前提下,若上游地区在协商中具有完全耐心或中下游地区完全没有耐心,则上游获得全部净收益,补偿标准为 252 912.96 万元/a;若上游地区完全没有耐心,且当中下游耐心程度(贴现因子)为0.5时,则双方将均分净收益,即补偿标准为 197 523.25 万元/a。总的来看,研究对流域生态系统服务保护的成本收益分析及跨区域生态补偿标准核算提供了可行思路,实际应用中可根据具体情况合理设定议价双方贴现因子进行灵活处理。

Abstract: Reasonable compensation standard is the core of watershed ecological compensation, and it is also the key content of stimulating the enthusiasm of ecosystem service providers, reflecting the value of ecosystem service improvement and realizing regional coordinated development. Based on the cost-benefit perspective and taking Wei River Basin as an example, this paper calculates the cost-benefit of ecosystem service protection by using the full-cost method and choice experiment respectively, and then calculates the ecological compensation standard by using Rubinstein bargaining model. The results show that: (1) in order to improve the ecological condition of the river basin, the direct cost of Gansu Province in the upper reaches is about 350.212 7 million yuan /year, the indirect cost is about 1 071.122 6 million yuan /year, and the full cost is about 1 421.335 3 million yuan /year; (2) the benefits of improving the ecosystem services in the river basin can be 2 529.129 6 million yuan for Shaanxi Province in the middle and lower reaches; (3) on the premise of cost-benefit of ecosystem service protection, if upstream area has complete patience or downstream area has no patience at all, upstream area will get all net income, and the compensation standard is 2 529.129 6 million yuan /year; if upstream area is completely impatient and the patient level (discount factor) of middle and downstream area is 0.5, both sides will share the net income equally, that is, the compensation standard is 1 975.232 5 million yuan /year. Generally speaking, this study provides a feasible idea for cost-benefit analysis of ecosystem services protection and transboundary ecological compensation standard accounting. In practical application, discount factors can be reasonably set for both sides of the bargaining process according to specific conditions.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 吴华武| 章新平| 孙广禄| 黄一民| 申 林| 郭丽香. 湖南长沙地区大气降水中稳定同位素特征变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(05): 540 .
[2] 董 锋,徐喜辉,龙如银,韩 宇. 我国碳排放区域差异性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(11): 1526 .
[3] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[4] 伍文琪, 罗贤, 黄玮。李运刚. 云南省水资源承载力评价与时空分布特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1385 .
[5] 安俞静, 刘静玉, 李 宁, 乔墩墩, 刘梦丽. 中原城市群铁路网络可达性及经济联系格局[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1947 -1957 .
[6] 陈万旭 李江风 冉端. 长江中游城市群土地利用转型和城镇化之间空间关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[7] 赵 毅, 徐绪堪, 李晓娟. 基于变权灰色云模型的江苏省水环境系统脆弱性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2463 -2471 .
[8] 任娟, 王建力, 杨平恒, 詹兆君, . 亚高山旅游景区岩溶地下水水化学动态变化及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2548 -2557 .
[9] 孔锋, 方建, 孙劭, 王品, 吕丽莉, . 基于超阈值取样的中国不同重现期降雨强度空间分异特征及强降雨变化模态(1961~2016年)[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 144 -156 .
[10] 郭庆宾, 骆 康, 黎珏铭, 刘承良. 武汉城市圈资源集聚能力的空间关联研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 306 -312 .