长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (10): 2383-2391.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202110007

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

未来预期、农户分化与宅基地退出抉择

冯娜娜1,孙博睿2 ,赵启然1,孙小龙3*   

  1. (1.中国农业大学经济管理学院,北京100083; 2.芝加哥大学哈里斯公共政策学院,美国 伊利诺伊州 芝加哥 60615; 3.江苏省农业科学院农业经济与发展研究所,江苏 南京 210014)
  • 出版日期:2021-10-20 发布日期:2021-11-05

Future Expectation, Farmers’ Differentiation and Decision of Withdrawing from Rural Homesteads

FENG Na-na1,SUN Bo-rui2, ZHAO Qi-ran1,SUN Xiao-long3   

  1. (1. College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China;2. Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, Chicago IL 60615, the United States;3. Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China)
  • Online:2021-10-20 Published:2021-11-05

摘要:  建立农村宅基地有偿退出机制是缓解城乡用地供需矛盾、促进乡村振兴的重要方面。基于宅基地退出试点地区农户调研数据,通过中介效应和调节效应检验,考察农户未来预期对宅基地退出行为的作用机理。研究表明:积极的预期使农户具有更高的宅基地退出意愿,并对农户退出行为具有显著的正向作用;农户分化在“未来预期—宅基地退出意愿—退出行为”影响路径中具有调节效应,非农收入占比越高的农户,宅基地退出意愿对退出行为的正向影响越强,农户将积极的预期转化为退出行为的概率越大。故此,可从稳定农户预期和创造农户宅基地退出的能力及条件入手,稳定农户预期,关注农户就业,鼓励和引导有积极预期、有条件的农户参与宅基地退出。

Abstract: Establishing a compensated rural homestead withdrawal mechanism has great practical significance of alleviating the imbalance between supply and demand for urban and rural land and promoting rural revitalization. Based on household surveys of farmers from 5 counties in Zhejiang and Sichuan, this paper focuses on examining the mechanism of how expectations influence farmers’ behaviour in homestead withdrawal by using moderating and mediating effects. Our research has found that: first, farmers with positive expectations about the future are more likely to withdraw from homesteads. According to the moderating test, farmers’ willingness of homestead withdrawal acts as a mediator between their expectations and homestead withdrawal behaviour. Second, the moderating test shows that the differentiation of farmers is a moderator variable between the willingness and behaviour of homestead withdrawal. Farmers with greater proportions of non-agricultural income are more likely to realize their will of homestead withdrawal into actual behaviour. We are able to conclude that: farmers’ expectations and households’ non-agricultural income share complement each other. An increase of non-agricultural employment or non-agricultural income share will increase the probability of homestead withdrawal among farmers with positive expectations and ability to afford homestead withdrawal. Therefore, we recommend that the government should stabilize farmers’ expectations of future and reduce the opportunity costs of withdrawing from rural homestead to make withdrawal more appealing and affordable to farmers. Relevant policies may include stabilizing farmers’ withdrawal expectations, increasing famers’ employment in non-agricultural sector, establishing a stable employment mechanism for farmers who withdrew from homesteads and providing employment preferential policies.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 安俞静, 刘静玉, 李 宁, 乔墩墩, 刘梦丽. 中原城市群铁路网络可达性及经济联系格局[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1947 -1957 .
[2] 陈炳. 长三角城市群生态文明建设与城市化耦合协调发展研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 韦胜 徐建刚 马海涛. 长三角高铁网络结构特征及形成机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[4] 张映雪, 王瑞, 屈霄, 夏文彤, 辛未, 郭传波, 陈宇顺.  

不同鱼类养殖方式对长江中游湖泊浮游植物群落的影响及其季节动态 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2260 -2269 .

[5] 陈万旭 李江风 冉端. 长江中游城市群土地利用转型和城镇化之间空间关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 赵 毅, 徐绪堪, 李晓娟. 基于变权灰色云模型的江苏省水环境系统脆弱性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2463 -2471 .
[7] 任娟, 王建力, 杨平恒, 詹兆君, . 亚高山旅游景区岩溶地下水水化学动态变化及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2548 -2557 .
[8] 张媛媛 袁奋强 刘东皇 陈利馥. 产业生态化水平的测度及其影响因素研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[9] 孔锋, 方建, 孙劭, 王品, 吕丽莉, . 基于超阈值取样的中国不同重现期降雨强度空间分异特征及强降雨变化模态(1961~2016年)[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 144 -156 .
[10] 魏建瑛, 徐建英, 樊斐斐. 卧龙自然保护区植被覆盖度变化及其对地形因子的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 440 -449 .