长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (10): 2482-2491.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202110016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

汉江与嘉陵江源区黄土的风化成土强度及其在土壤系统分类中的归属

刘艳玲,庞奖励*,黄春长,查小春,周亚利,王海鹏,王海燕,戎晓庆
  

  1. (陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院,陕西 西安 710119)
  • 出版日期:2021-10-20 发布日期:2021-11-05

Weathering Intensity of Loess and Its Attribution in Soil Taxonomy in the  Source Region of Hanjiang and Jialing Rivers

LIU Yan-ling, PANG Jiang-li, HUANG Chun-chang, ZHA Xiao-chun, ZHOU Ya-li, WANG Hai-peng, WANG Hai-yan, RONG Xiao-qing   

  1. (School of geography and tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi′an 710119, China)
  • Online:2021-10-20 Published:2021-11-05

摘要: 以汉江源区(李家河村)和嘉陵江源区(杨家山村)黄土剖面为研究对象,对其粒度、元素组成、团聚体等进行分析与对比,探究两地土壤成土强度与系统分类归属。结果表明两江源区的土壤风化成土特征级类明显不同:(1)两地土壤团聚体主要分布在0.25~1 mm范围内,但汉江源区(LJH)土壤上部的大团聚体含量R0.25值(83.73%)、平均重量直径MWD值(2.17)和几何平均直径GMD值(1.11)均大于嘉陵江源区(YJS)的土壤(其R0.25值为69.81%,MWD和GMD值分别为1.06、0.47),团聚体稳定性更强,而剖面中下部则相反,土体稳定性弱于后者;(2)嘉陵江源区土壤的风化程度仅达到低等向中等强度过渡阶段,与其相比,汉江源区土壤的钾钠比值和残积指数较高、硅铝铁率和淋溶系数较低,钙、钠等易溶元素风化淋失更强,产生的富铝黏土矿物更多,达到中等风化强度,故后者风化成土强度远大于前者;(3)在土壤系统分类中,汉江源区黄土母质发育的土壤可归为斑纹简育湿润淋溶土,嘉陵江源区土壤可归为普通钙积干润淋溶土。 

Abstract: Taking the loess profile in the source region of Hanjiang River (Lijiahe village) and the Jialing River (Yangjiashan village) as the research object, explorated the weathering intensity of loess and its main attribution in soil taxonomy scientifically. The physical and chemical properties, grain size, element composition, aggregates of soil profile and so on were analyzed and compared. The results of experiment show that the soil weathering characteristics in this two river source regions are obviously different: (1)The soil aggregates in this two regions are mainly distributed in the range of 0.25~1 mm, but the contents of big aggregates (R0.25 is 83.73%), the values of mean weight diamet (MWD is 2.17) and geometric mean diameter (GMD is 1.11) in the surface of the soil profile in the source region of Hanjiang River (LJH) are higher than Jialing River (YJS) respectively (R0.25 is 69.81%, MWD is 1.06, and GMD is 0.47), so the soil aggregates of Hanjiang River are more stable, while the middle and lower parts of the soil profile are opposite. (2) Compared with the soil weathering in the source region of Jialing River, the source region of Hanjiang River shows a higher ratio of potassium to sodium and residual index, lower silicon and iron-aluminum ratio and leaching coefficient, stronger weathering and leaching loss of soluble elements such as calcium and sodium, besides, more aluminum rich clay minerals. The soil weathering in the source region of Jialing River is just in a transition from low strength to medium strength, while the soil weathering in the source region of Hanjiang River can reach medium intensity. Therefore, the weathering strength of the latter is much greater than that of the former. (3) According to the Soil Taxonomy, the soil developed from the loess parent material is classified as the Mot-Hap-Udic Luvisols in the source region of Hanjiang River, while it is classified as the Typ-Cal-Ustic Luvisols in the source region of Jialing River. 


No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李建豹, 黄贤金, 孟 浩, 周 艳, 徐国良, 吴常艳. “十二五”时期中国碳排放强度累积目标完成率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1655 .
[2] 熊鸿斌, 周凌燕. 基于PSR-灰靶模型的巢湖环湖防洪治理工程生态环境影响评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1977 -1987 .
[3] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[4] 李嘉译, 匡鸿海, 谭 超, 王佩佩. 长江经济带城市扩张的时空特征与生态响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2153 -2161 .
[5] 唐子珺, 陈龙, 覃军, 郑翔. 武汉市一次污染过程的局地流场和边界层结构的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[6] 王东香, 张一鸣, 王锐诚, 赵炳炎, 张志麒, 黄咸雨, . 神农架大九湖泥炭地孔隙水溶解有机碳特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2568 -2577 .
[7] 王海力, 韩光中, 谢贤健. 基于DEA模型的西南地区耕地利用效率时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2784 -2795 .
[8] 汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .
[9] 赵树成, 张展羽, 夏继红, 杨洁, 盛丽婷, 唐丹, 陈晓安, . 鄱阳湖滨岸土壤磷素吸附特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 166 -174 .
[10] 阮甜, 查芊郁, 杨茹, 高超. 全球升温1.5℃和2.0℃对长江寸滩站以上流域径流的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 407 -415 .