长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (11): 2755-2762.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202111018

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

嘉陵江流域采矿废弃物安全现状研究-对小规模堆场的指示意义

李晓雨1,杨放2,彭秀红1,3,李贺领1,唐亮1,3*   

  1. (1.成都理工大学地球科学学院,四川 成都 610059;2.四川省发展环境科学技术研究院有限公司,
    四川 成都 610072;3.成都理工大学地学核技术四川省重点实验室,四川 成都 610059)
  • 出版日期:2021-11-20 发布日期:2021-12-14

Security Assessment of Mining Wastes in Jialing River Basin-Indicative Significance for Small-scale Storage Yards

LI Xiao-yu1, YANG Fang2, PENG Xiu-hong1,3, LI He-ling1, TANG Liang1,3   

  1. (1. College of Earth Sciences, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;2. Sichuan Development Environmental Science and Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd, Chengdu 610072, China;3. Applied Nuclear Techniques in Geosciences Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)
  • Online:2021-11-20 Published:2021-12-14

摘要: 全球采矿废弃物堆场平均面积为1.3 km2,我国采矿废弃物堆场为0.363 km2,而嘉陵江流域132个采矿废弃物堆场(主要为尾矿库)平均面积仅为0.11 km2,属于典型的小规模采矿废弃物堆场。规模越小越不易引起监管重视,易产生滑坡、泥石流、矿渣扩散污染等环境问题,研究其安全现状具有重要意义。本文以野外调查为基础,对堆场与流域地理要素耦合关系进行分析,发现采矿废弃物堆场多位于嘉陵江上游,严重影响下游四川省广元市、南充市,甚至重庆市的用水安全。此外,流域内采矿废弃物堆场“头顶库”比例接近90%,不规范堆场比例达38.6%;结合流域内坡度分析,发现流域内采矿废弃物受滑坡威胁的比例大于43.2%。在水/风侵蚀作用下,采矿废弃物将有5.4~7.2 t/a左右的有害重金属(Pb、Zn为主)进入临近土壤及水系中,形成持久危害。嘉陵江流域采矿废弃物所在地形、气候、堆场规模及监督管理是影响堆场安全的重要因素,相关部门应重视矿山尾矿库的前期规划,重视小规模采矿废弃物的后期监督管理。

Abstract: The average occupied land of global mining waste storage yard is 1.3 km2, the China is 0.363 km2, while the Jialing River Basin is only 0.11 km2 from 132 mining waste storage yards (mainly tailings ponds), which is a typical small-scale cases. Small-scale mining waste yard is hard to attract authority attention, and readily lead to landslide, debris flow, and waste diffusion pollution. Based on field surveys, combined with Remote Sensing, GIS and watershed geographic factors, it reveal that mining waste is located in the upstream of the Jialing River, and seriously affects the water safety of Guangyuan and Nanchong City in Sichuan province, and Chongqing City. In addition, the proportion of “overhead storehouse” in the mining waste storage yard is close to 90%, the non-standard storage yards is 38.6%, the wastes sites which threatened by landslides are greater than 43.2%. Under the water/wind erosion, 5.4-7.2 ton/year of toxic metals (mainly Pb and Zn) diffuse to the adjacent soil and water systems, eventually causing permanent contaminant. The terrain, climate, dumped scale, supervision and management are the factors that affect the safety of mining waste, relevant departments should focus on the preliminary layout of mine tailings ponds and strengthen the management of small-scale mining wastes yard.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[2] 伍文琪, 罗贤, 黄玮。李运刚. 云南省水资源承载力评价与时空分布特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1385 .
[3] 王辉, 延军平, 王鹏涛, 武亚群. 多民族地区经济差异的空间格局演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1390 .
[4] 杨宏, 李会琳, 路璐. 嘉陵江(南充段)水体及其底泥中氨氧化微生物群落空间分布特征及其与环境因子关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1836 .
[5] 李恩康, 陆玉麒, 王 毅, 黄群芳, 郭 政. 城镇化对制度转型的影响——基于江苏13个市的脉冲响应函数分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1919 -1927 .
[6] 魏国恩, 朱 翔, 贺清云. 环长株潭城市群空间联系演变特征与对策研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1958 -1967 .
[7] 啜明英, 马骏, 刘德富, 杨正健. 整流幕对香溪河库湾水温特性影响数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2101 -2113 .
[8] 朱寅健. (新)环鄱阳湖区域交通网络通达性与旅游一体化发展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[9] 田 鹏, 李加林, 史小丽, 王丽佳, 刘瑞清. 浙江省土地利用格局时空变化及生态风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2697 -2706 .
[10] 危小建, 陈竹安, 张 蕾, 江 平, 吴 芳, . 引入城市扩张干扰效应的生态服务价值化方法改进[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 30 -38 .