长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (4): 869-878.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202104010

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于LMDI的长江经济带沿线水利风景区规模演变影响因素分析

吴兆丹1,2,3,华  钰1,李  彤1,吴兆磊4,蔡沁雨1,马玮璐1   

  1. (1. 河海大学商学院,江苏 常州 213022;2. 江苏省“世界水谷”与水生态文明协同创新中心,江苏 南京 211100;3. 河海大学“一带一路”非洲研究中心,江苏 常州 213022;4. 华北水利水电大学电力学院,河南 郑州 450045)
  • 出版日期:2021-04-20 发布日期:2021-05-17

Influencing Factor Analysis of the Scale Evolution of Water Conservancy Scenic Spots along the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on LMDI

WU Zhao-dan 1,2,3, HUA Yu 1, LI Tong 1, WU Zhao-lei 4,CAI Qin-yu 1, MA Wei-lu 1   

  1. ( 1. Business School, Hohai University, Changzhou 213022, China; 2. Jiangsu Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center of World Water Valley and Water Ecological Civilization, Nanjing 211100, China; 3. Center of Africa Studies with One Belt One Road, Hohai University, Changzhou 213022, China;4. School of Electric Power, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China)
  • Online:2021-04-20 Published:2021-05-17

摘要: 水利风景区规模演变影响因素分析可为推进水利风景区建设,促进区域可持续发展提供参考。采用LMDI方法,首次量化了水利风景区建设强度、水利工程开发程度、水资源配置结构和水资源量等四因素对长江经济带沿线水利风景区规模演变的影响。研究发现:(1)对经济带沿线整体水利风景区规模演变而言,水资源量是最主要正向影响因素,水资源配置结构的影响最小。(2)对经济带分省市水利风景区规模演变而言,四因素中水利风景区建设强度和水利工程开发程度在四川、重庆、贵州均呈最强正向作用,在湖南、湖北、安徽和浙江分别是最主要正向和负向影响因素,在云南分别呈最显著负向和正向影响;江苏、江西对应最显著正向影响因素为水利工程开发程度;四川、重庆、江苏对应最主要负向影响因素为水资源配置结构;经济带整体水资源量在贵州、江西均呈负向影响。继而对经济带沿线省市有关水利风景区建设提出针对性建议。

Abstract: The influencing factor analysis of the scale evolution of water conservancy scenic spot (WCSS), can provide reference for promoting the construction of this kind of scenic spot, and enhancing regional sustainable development. With LMDI model, the factor contribution of scale evolution of WCSS along Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) are quantified. The factors include the construction intensity of WCSS, the development degree of water conservancy projects, the structure of water resources allocation and the endowment of water resources for the first time. The results show that: (1) For the WCSS scale evolution of the whole YREB,the influence of the endowment of water resources is the strongest positive,while the structure of water resources allocation shows the weakest impact. (2) For the WCSS scale evolution in each provinces along the YREB, among the four factors, the construction intensity of WCSS, and the development degree of water conservancy projects, play the strongest positive role in Sichuan, Chongqing and Guizhou, have respectively the most important positive and negative effect in Hunan, Hubei, Anhui and Zhejiang, and contrarily play respectively significant negative and positive roles in Yunnan. The most significant factor with positive influence in Jiangxi and Jiangsu is the development degree of water conservancy projects. The main negative influencing factor in Sichuan, Chongqing and Jiangsu is the structure of water resources allocation, while the water resource endowment of YREB shows negative effect in Guizhou and Jiangxi. Then some focalized suggestions are put forward on the construction of the WCSS for YREB.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 叶 浩,濮励杰,张 健. 我国粮食主产区耕地产出效率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 584 .
[2] 徐嘉兴 |李 钢 |渠俊峰 |何林帮. 洪泽湖地区土地利用与景观格局演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(10): 1211 .
[3] 王柳艳| 许有鹏| 余铭婧. 城镇化对太湖平原河网的影响——以太湖流域武澄锡虞区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(02): 151 .
[4] 甘衍军| 李兰| 武见| 叶爱中. 基于EFDC的二滩水库水温模拟及水温分层影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(04): 476 .
[5] 王玉良,王晖,徐如松,阿不都拉·阿巴斯. 安徽省地衣研究的历史分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(08): 1072 .
[6] 杨少荣, 黎明政, 朱其广, 王美荣, 刘焕章. 鄱阳湖鱼类群落结构及其时空动态[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(01): 54 .
[7] 肖刚, 杜德斌, 李恒, 戴其文. 长江中游城市群城市创新差异的时空格局演变[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 199 -207 .
[8] 安俞静, 刘静玉, 李 宁, 乔墩墩, 刘梦丽. 中原城市群铁路网络可达性及经济联系格局[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1947 -1957 .
[9] 陈万旭 李江风 冉端. 长江中游城市群土地利用转型和城镇化之间空间关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[10] 赵 毅, 徐绪堪, 李晓娟. 基于变权灰色云模型的江苏省水环境系统脆弱性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2463 -2471 .