长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (8): 1783-1794.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202108001

• 区域可持续发展 •    下一篇

长江经济带科技创新资源集聚能力空间格局及网络结构

骆  康1,郭庆宾2,刘耀彬1,3*   

  1. (1.南昌大学经济管理学院,江西 南昌 330031;2.海南大学经济学院,海南 海口 570228;3.南昌大学中国中部经济社会发展研究中心,江西 南昌 330031)
  • 出版日期:2021-08-20 发布日期:2021-09-06

Research on Spatial Pattern and Network Structure Analysis of Science and Technology Innovation Resources Aggregating Ability in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

LUO Kang1,GUO Qing-bin2,LIU Yao-bin 1,3   

  1. (1.School of Economic&Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031,China; 2.School of Economics, Hainan University, Haikou 570228,China;3.Research Center of the Central Economic and Social Development, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031,China)
  • Online:2021-08-20 Published:2021-09-06

摘要: 随着科技创新资源由技术推动和需求拉动的线性模式转向合作的空间网络模式,探究其空间格局及网络结构特征,剖析空间格局及网络结构形成的原因,对区域实现科技创新引领发展具有重要意义。基于ArcGIS可视化和社会网络分析法对2004~2017年长江经济带科技创新资源集聚能力的空间格局及网络结构特征进行分析,结果显示:(1)长江经济带科技创新资源集聚能力呈现逐渐增强的态势,两极分化现象严重,由东向西梯次变弱,且具有明显“领导型—追赶型—跟随型”的特征;(2)科技创新资源集聚能力空间网络联系愈来愈密集,网络密度呈现下降趋势,网络等级、网络效率均呈现上升趋势;(3)中心度排名前十位城市的科技创新资源集聚能力与其他城市空间网络联系较多,并在网络中处于中心位置和扮演支配者角色;(4)包含上海、苏州等33个城市的板块一属于“净溢出”板块,包含重庆、成都等26个城市的板块二属于“双向溢出”板块,包含武汉、长沙等41个城市的板块三属于“经纪人”板块,包含贵阳、昆明等29个城市的板块四属于“净受益”板块。鉴于此,从大力发展新型基础设施建设、促进核心城市科技创新驱动和推进科技创新资源合作平台的构建等方面提出了政策建议。

Abstract: As science and technology innovation resources gradually shift from a technology-driven and demand-driven linear model to a cooperative spatial network model,it is of great significance for regional science and technology innovation to explore the characteristics of its spatial pattern and network structure,and analyze the reasons for its formation.This paper uses the Arcgis visualization and social network analysis method to analyze the spatial pattern and network structure character of science and technology innovation resources in the Yangtze River economic belt from 2004 to 2017.The results show that: (1)the sci-tech innovation resources aggregation ability of the Yangtze River Economic Belt is gradually increasing, the polarization is serious, the gradient from east to west becomes weaker,and it have the characteristic of “leading-pursuing-following type” obviously;(2) the spatial network of Science and Technology Innovation Resources gathering ability is becoming more and more intensive,the network density presents the downward trend,the network grade,and the network efficiency present the upward trend;(3) the ability of sci-tech innovation resource aggregation of the top ten cities is more connected with other urban spatial networks, and plays a central and dominant role in the networks;(4)plate 1(33 cities including Shanghai and Nanjing) belongs to the “net spillover” plate,plate 2(26 cities including Chongqing and Chengdu) belongs to the “broker” plate,and plate 3(41 cities including Wuhan and Changsha) belongs to the “bidirectional spillover” plate Plate 4(Guiyang, Kunming and 29 other cities) is a “net beneficial” plate.According to the above conclusions,this paper puts forward some policy suggestions from the following aspects:vigorously develop new types of infrastructure,promoting scientific and technological innovation in core cities and promoting the construction of sci-tech innovation resources cooperation platform.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙惠惠, 章新平, 罗紫东, 尚程鹏, 贺新光, 饶志国.  近53 a来长江流域极端降水指数特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1879 .
[2] 童庆蒙 张露 张俊飚. 土地流转能否提升农民生活满意度?——来自湖北省江汉平原地区的经验证据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 周晟吕, 李月寒, 胡 静, 封竞男. 基于问卷调查的上海市大气环境质量改善的支付意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2419 -2424 .
[4] 屈小娥. 中国生态效率的区域差异及影响因素——基于时空差异视角的实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2673 -2683 .
[5] 吕乐婷, 王晓蕊, 孙才志, 张 杰. 基于SWAT模型的细河流域蓝水绿水资源量时空分布研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 39 -47 .
[6] 孙传谆, 甄霖, 刘小玲, 刘通, 吴顺辉, 李景刚. 小尺度上蜜蜂传粉服务与耕地利用集约水平之间权衡关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 112 -121 .
[7] 李艳, 马百胜, 杨宣. 两类ENSO事件对中国东部地区极端降水的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 469 -482 .
[8] 张亚飞, 廖和平, 李义龙, . 基于反规划与FLUS模型的城市增长边界划定研究——以重庆市渝北区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(04): 757 -767 .
[9] 何小芊. 基于不同尺度的湘鄂赣地区传统村落空间分异及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[10] 盛叶子, 曾蒙秀, 彭海军, 李 雪, 高 洋, 朱丽东, 李凤全, 胡忠行, 苏 婕, 余奕泓. 1470~1949年贵州地区干湿序列的重建及其影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(06): 1354 -1364 .