长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (1): 194-206.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202301018

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

1995~2015年中国乡村土地利用功能转型特征与耦合协调演变分析

程宪波1,刘琼1,2 ,陶宇1,2, 欧维新1,2   

  1. (1.南京农业大学公共管理学院(土地管理学院), 江苏 南京 210095; 2. 农村土地资源利用与整治国家地方联合工程研究中心, 江苏 南京 210095)
  • 出版日期:2023-01-20 发布日期:2023-03-09

Spatial-temporal Characteristics, Coordination Status and Evolution of the Rural Land Use Functions Transition in China from 1995 to 2015

CHENG Xian-bo1, LIU Qiong1,2, TAO Yu1,2, OU Wei-xin1,2   

  1. (1. College of Public Administration (College of Land Management), Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; 
    2. National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Rural Land Resources Use and Consolidation, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Online:2023-01-20 Published:2023-03-09

摘要: 土地是支撑乡村发展的资源载体,以乡村可持续发展为导向的土地利用功能转型是实现乡村土地资源可持续利用的必然要求。利用1995~2015年全国农村固定观察点调查数据定量分析了中国及东中西乡村土地利用功能转型与耦合协调演变特征,并讨论了我国乡村可持续发展的路径。结果显示:时间上,1995~2015年全国乡村土地利用社会与生态功能降低,其中社会功能缘于空间承载和就业支撑的持续弱化,生态功能缘于环境净化功能持续弱化;空间上,东中西的经济、社会和生态功能呈现明显的空间优弱势差异,具体指东部的就业支撑、环境净化,中部的经济产出、空间承载和西部的食物供给等相较其他地域空间同一功能呈现相对弱势;经济与社会、经济与生态功能转型呈现权衡关系,子功能两组(即“食物供给、经济产出、民生保障和生态维持”功能组与“空间承载、就业支撑和环境净化”功能组)呈现组内协同、组间权衡关系;目前,乡村土地利用经济、社会和生态功能之间耦合协调度主要处在初级协调阶段,整体上向更高耦合协调程度递进式演化。可通过采用多功能协同转型提升模式,具体可选择动力内生型、环境友好型等路径全面发展中国乡村。

Abstract: Land is the resource carrier supporting rural development. The transformation of land use function oriented by sustainable rural development is the necessary requirement to realize sustainable rural land resources utilization. The process of rural development is closely linked to the transformation of land use functions. Based on the survey data of fixed observation points in rural areas of China from 1995 to 2015, this paper quantitatively analyzed the spatio-temporal evolution characteristics and spatial differences of rural land use function transformation in China, and eastern, middle, and western region of China, and discussed the path of sustainable rural development harmonized in China in the future. The results showed that: In terms of time, the social and ecological functions of rural land use decreased from 1995 to 2015, in which the social function was due to the continuous weakening of spatial carrying capacity and employment support, and the environmental function was due to the continuous weakening of environmental purification function. Spatially, the economic, social, and ecological functions of rural land use in eastern and western show obvious spatial differences of advantages and disadvantages. Specifically, employment support and environmental purification in eastern of China, economic output and spatial carrying capacity in central and food supply in western are relatively weak compared with the same spatial functions in other regions. There is a trade-off between economic and social functions, and between economic and ecological functions. There is an intra-group coordination and inter-group trade-off between the two secondary function groups (food supply, economic output, livelihood security and ecological maintenance) and (spatial carrying capacity, employment support and environmental purification). At present, the coupling coordination degree between economic, social and ecological functions of rural land use is mainly in the primary coordination stage and presents a progressive change law from low level to high level coupling. By adopting the multi-functional coordinated transformation and upgrading mode, we can choose the paths of endogenous power and environmental friendliness to comprehensively develop China’s rural areas. Rural regions may be comprehensively developed by selecting multi-functional coordinated transformation and upgrading modes such as endogenous dynamic and environment-friendly.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[2] 侯雯嘉, 陈长青, 乔辉, 孙新素, 周曙东. 1980~2009年长江下游地区油菜冻害时空特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .
[3] 李 璐, 董 捷, 张俊峰. 长江经济带城市土地利用效率地区差异及形成机理[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1666 .
[4] 钟业喜, 傅 钰, 朱治州, 王晓静.  基于母子企业联系的上市公司网络结构研究——以长江中游城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1725 .
[5] 芦鑫, 殷淑燕, 王水霞, 高涛涛. 秦岭南北地区农业气候资源时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1866 .
[6] 危小建 陈竹安 张蕾 江平 吴芳. 引入城市扩张干扰效应的生态服务价值化方法改进[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[7] 舒旺 王鹏 肖汉玉 刘君政 赵君 余小芳. 鄱阳湖流域乐安河水化学特征及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[8] 张小峰, 闫昊晨, 岳遥, 卢雅婷.  

50年金沙江各区段年径流量变化及分析 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2283 -2292 .

[9] 梅梦媛, 陈振杰, 张云倩, 张亚楠, . 居民活动空间与生态约束协调的城市开发边界划定方法——以长沙市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2472 -2480 .
[10] 程谅, 郭忠录, 秦嘉惠. 长期施肥对小麦—玉米轮作红壤抗蚀性的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 212 -221 .