长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (4): 692-705.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202304002

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江经济带沿线城市水资源绿色效率及节水减排潜力时空演变

安  慧1,汪永豪1,安  敏2*,王丽杰1   

  1. (1. 三峡大学水利与环境学院,湖北 宜昌443002; 2.三峡大学经济与管理学院,湖北 宜昌443002)
  • 出版日期:2023-04-20 发布日期:2023-04-27

Spatial-temporal Evolution of Water Resources Green Efficiency and Potential of Water-saving and Emission-abating in Cities Along Yangtze River Economic Belt

AN Hui1,WANG Yong-hao1,AN Min2,WANG Li-jie1   

  1. (1. College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China; 2.College of Economics and Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)
  • Online:2023-04-20 Published:2023-04-27

摘要: 准确测算长江经济带沿线城市水资源绿色效率,对长江经济带沿线城市的水资源合理利用和绿色发展建设具有重要意义。运用SE-SBM模型(Super-Efficiency Slacks-Based Model)测度2010~2019年长江经济带沿线45个城市水资源绿色效率,结合泰尔指数分解探究其水资源绿色效率地区差异的形成根源,并采用ML指数方法(Malmquist-Luenberger)挖掘水资源绿色效率变化的内在原因;进而,利用水资源投入和水污染物产出的实际值与最优值的差异测算长江经济带沿线45个城市的节水减排潜力。结果显示:(1)研究期内长江经济带沿线45个城市有77.8%的城市水资源绿色效率处于无效率,水资源绿色效率空间分布呈现为长江经济带下游>上游>中游;(2)2010~2019年长江经济带沿线45个城市水资源绿色效率整体处于上升阶段,但有昭通、丽江、攀枝花、贵阳、铜陵、湖州、绍兴、舟山和鄂州等9个沿线城市水资源绿色效率处于下降阶段,受到不同程度的纯技术效率、规模效率和技术进步变化的影响;(3)将节水潜力、污水减排潜力和工业废水减排潜力值分别划分为“低、中和高”3个区间段,并将沿线45个城市分为“三高、二高、一高、中等和三低”5种类型,其中岳阳、马鞍山、黄石和荆州等4个城市属于“三高”类型;在空间格局上,节水减排潜力“三低”类型的城市呈现出“大连片,小散落”的集聚形势。基于以上研究结果,本研究可为促进长江经济带沿线城市水资源合理开发利用,实现区域高质量绿色发展提供对策。

Abstract: Accurately measuring the green efficiency of water resources in cities along the Yangtze River Economic Belt is of great significance to the rational utilization of water resources and green development and construction of cities along the Yangtze River Economic Belt. The SE-SBM model (Super-Efficiency Slacks-Based Model) is used to measure the green efficiency of water resources in 45 cities along the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2010 to 2019. Combined with the decomposition of Theil index, the root causes of regional differences in green efficiency of water resources are explored, and the ML index method (Malmquist-Luenberger) is used to explore the internal causes of changes in green efficiency of water resources; Furthermore, the difference between the actual value and the optimal value of water resources input and water pollutant output is used to calculate the water-saving and emission reduction potential of 45 cities along the Yangtze River Economic Belt. The results show that: First, during the study period, 77.8% of the 45 cities along the Yangtze River Economic Belt were inefficient in the green efficiency of urban water resources, and the spatial distribution of green efficiency of water resources shows that the lower reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt > the upper reaches > the middle reaches; Second, from 2010 to 2019, the green efficiency of water resources in 45 cities along the Yangtze River Economic Belt was on the rise, but the green efficiency of water resources in 9 cities along the Yangtze River Economic Belt, including Zhaotong, Lijiang, Panzhihua, Guiyang, Tongling, Huzhou, Shaoxing, Zhoushan and Ezhou, was on the decline, which was affected by the changes of pure technical efficiency, scale efficiency and technological progress to varying degrees; Third, the water-saving potential, sewage emission reduction potential and industrial wastewater emission reduction potential are divided into three sections of “low, medium and high”, and 45 cities along the line are divided into five types of “three high, two high, one high, medium and three low”, of which Yueyang, Ma’anshan, Huangshi and Jingzhou belong to the “three high” type; In terms of spatial pattern, cities with “three low” types of water-saving and emission reduction potential show the agglomeration trend of “large settlement, small scattered”. Based on the above research results, this study can provide countermeasures for promoting the rational development and utilization of urban water resources along the Yangtze River Economic Belt and realizing regional high-quality green development.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[2] 侯雯嘉, 陈长青, 乔辉, 孙新素, 周曙东. 1980~2009年长江下游地区油菜冻害时空特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .
[3] 芦鑫, 殷淑燕, 王水霞, 高涛涛. 秦岭南北地区农业气候资源时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1866 .
[4] 孙传谆 甄霖 刘小玲 吴顺辉 李景刚 刘通. 小尺度上蜜蜂传粉服务与耕地利用集约水平之间权衡关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[5] 马坤, 唐晓岚, 刘思源, 王奕文, 任宇杰, 刘小涵. 长江流域国家级保护地空间分布特征及其国家公园廊道空间策略研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2053 -2069 .
[6] 舒旺 王鹏 肖汉玉 刘君政 赵君 余小芳. 鄱阳湖流域乐安河水化学特征及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[7] 梅梦媛, 陈振杰, 张云倩, 张亚楠, . 居民活动空间与生态约束协调的城市开发边界划定方法——以长沙市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2472 -2480 .
[8] 田效琴 王龙昌 贾会娟 熊瑛 石超 黄召存 陈娇 刑毅. 保护性耕作下蚕豆生育期土壤有机碳、氮含量变化与分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[9] 魏小芳 赵宇鸾 李秀彬 薛朝浪 夏四友. 基于“三生功能”的长江上游城市群国土空间特征及其优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[10] 洪步庭 任平. 基于最小累积阻力模型的农村居民点用地生态适宜性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .