长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (9): 1981-1991.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202309018

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    

秸秆还田配施化肥对油-稻轮作土壤固碳及作物经济效益分析

何如海1,张博睿2,汪玉芳3,蔡影2,叶梦雅1,苏虎2,胡宏祥2*,方恒2
  

  1. (1.安徽农业大学经济管理学院,安徽 合肥 230036;2.安徽农业大学资源与环境学院,安徽 合肥 230036;3.合肥经济技术学院,安徽 合肥 230031)
  • 出版日期:2023-09-20 发布日期:2023-09-22

Effects of Combining Returning Straw to Field and Applying Chemical Fertilizer on Soil Carbon Fixation and Economic Benefit in Rape-Rice Rotation Crops

HE Ru-hai1,ZHANG Bo-rui2,WANG Yu-fang3,CAI Ying2,YE Meng-ya1,SU Hu2,HU Hong-xiang2,FANG Heng2   

  1. (1.School of Economics and Management,Anhui Agricultural University ,Hefei 230036,China;2.School of Economics and Management,Anhui Agricultural University ,Hefei 230036,China;3.Hefei University of Economics,Hefei 230031,China)
  • Online:2023-09-20 Published:2023-09-22

摘要: 为提高秸秆的利用效率和综合效益,探讨秸秆还田配施化肥对农田土壤固碳能力和经济收益的影响。以连续秸秆还田7 a的定位试验田为平台,系统分析无秸秆+无施肥(CK)、常规施肥(F)、秸秆还田+常规施肥(SF)、秸秆还田+80%常规施肥(SDF)4种不同处理对巢湖地区油-稻轮作模式下不同土层(0~80 cm)土壤碳储量、固碳速率和作物经济收益的影响。(1)秸秆还田配施化肥能够提升0~50 cm土层土壤有机碳储量和固碳速率,与F处理相比较,SF和SDF处理的油菜季和水稻季碳储量增幅分别为1.20%~23.04%和3.86%~19.56%,油菜季和水稻季的固碳速率的增幅分别为-0.18~2.70倍和0.26~1.32倍。(2)与F处理相比,SF和SDF处理的油菜分别增产了8.29%和0.94%,水稻分别增产了11.04%和8.34%。(3)油菜季和水稻季SF处理的总产值和纯收益均为最大,SF较F处理油菜季总产值和纯收益分别增加了8.31% 和3.34%,水稻季总产值和纯收益分别增加了11.06%和23.57%。综上所述,秸秆还田配施化肥对提升油-稻轮作土壤固碳能力、土壤肥力和经济效益具有重要意义。


Abstract: The purpose of the investigation of the effects of straw returning combined with chemical fertilizers on farmland soil carbon sequestration capacity and economic benefits is to improve the utilization efficiency and comprehensive benefits of straw. This study was conducted in a 7-year in-situ test field. Four treatments were used to analyze the effects of different soil layers (0-80 cm) on soil carbon storage, carbon sequestration rate and crop economic benefits under the oil-rice rotation mode in the Chaohu area. These treatments included no straw returning and no fertilization (CK), conventional Fertilization (F), Straw returning + conventional Fertilization (SF), Straw returning + 80% conventional Fertilization (SDF). We found that: (1) Straw returning combined with chemical fertilization could increase soil organic carbon storage and carbon sequestration rate in the 0-50cm soil layer. Compared with conventional fertilization (F), full straw returning + conventional fertilization (SF) and full straw returning + 80% conventional fertilization (SDF) could increase the carbon storage of rapeseed season and rice season by 1.20%~23.04% and 3.86% to 19.56%, respectively. The increase of carbon sequestration rate in rapeseed season and rice season was -0.18 times to 2.70 times and 0.26 times to 1.32 times; (2) Compared with conventional fertilization (F), the yield rate of rapeseed season treated with SF increased by 8.29%, and that of rice season increased by 11.04%, while the yield of rape treated with SDF increased by 0.94%, and the yield of rice increased by 8.34%; (3) The total output value and net income of SF treatment in both rapeseed and rice seasons were the largest. Compared with F treatment, the total output value and net income of SF increased by 8.31% and 3.34%, respectively, in the rapeseed season, and the total output value and net income of the rice season increased by 11.06% and 23.57%. In summary, the combination of straw returning and chemical fertilization has great significance for the enhancement of soil carbon sequestration capacity, soil fertility and economic benefits of rapeseed-rice rotation.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 滕家喜, 周志翔, 李晨, 胡兴宜, 孙启祥. 石首市抑螺防病林空间布局优化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1430 .
[2] 王锐, 余涛, 杨忠芳, 侯青叶, 曾庆良, 马宏宏. 富硒土壤硒生物有效性及影响因素研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1460 .
[3] 付书科, 李小帆, 彭甲超, 张子悦, 陈 思. 基于动态因子分析法的长江三角洲城市群城镇化质量测度研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1909 -1918 .
[4] 张玉韩 吴尚昆 董延涛. 长江经济带矿产资源开发空间格局优化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[5] 李 娟, 董 平, 陆玉麒, 王 毅, 郭 政.  

中原经济区人口与经济空间格局演变研究 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2222 -2231 .

[6] 李 述, 葛 刚, 刘琪璟.  

基于主体功能区规划的江西省城镇化协调发展研究 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2250 -2259 .

[7] 张映雪, 王瑞, 屈霄, 夏文彤, 辛未, 郭传波, 陈宇顺.  

不同鱼类养殖方式对长江中游湖泊浮游植物群落的影响及其季节动态 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2260 -2269 .

[8] 孔锋, 杨萍, 王品, 吕丽莉, 孙劭. 中国灾害性对流天气日数的时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2518 -2528 .
[9] 查凯丽, 刘艳芳, 孔雪松, 田雅丝, 刘耀林, . 村镇路网通达性与空间出行研究——以武汉市李集镇为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2663 -2672 .
[10] 起永东, 何明琼, 郑永宏, 高 洁, 王 丹, 孔繁希. 汉江流域降水结构时空特征及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2830 -2838 .