长江流域资源与环境 >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (12): 2699-2712.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202412012

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

生态恢复背景下西南喀斯特地区自然生态系统脆弱性变化特征

袁稳玲1,周旭1*,李洪广1,张文彬1,冉光艳1,任芳2   

  1. (1.贵州师范大学 地理与环境科学学院,贵州 贵阳 550025;2.航天宏图技术股份有限公司,北京 100195)
  • 出版日期:2024-12-20 发布日期:2024-12-27

Characteristics of Natural Ecosystem Vulnerability Changes in Southwest Karst Region of China under Context of Ecological Restoration

YUAN Wen-ling1, ZHOU Xu1, LI Hong-guang1, ZHANG Wen-bing1, RAN Guang-yan1, REN Fang2   

  1. ( 1.School of Geography & Environmental Sciences,Guizhou Normal University ,Guiyang  550025, China; 2.PIESAT Information Technology Co. ,Beijing 100195,China)
  • Online:2024-12-20 Published:2024-12-27

摘要: 生态恢复工程的实施是改善自然生态系统脆弱性的重要举措。为揭示西南喀斯特地区自然生态系统脆弱性变化特征及未来变化的可持续性。基于生境-结构-功能量化框架,选取反映自然生态系统脆弱性指标体系,评估2001~2022年西南喀斯特地区自然生态系统脆弱性。结果表明:(1)从总体上看,西南喀斯特地区自然生态脆弱性指数(nEVI)中部和北部高,南部和东部低,年际平均nEVI呈减少趋势(R2=0.17,P<0.05);(2)从不同地貌区看,岩溶中高山区多年平均nEVI最大(0.73)且减少趋势最不显著;(3)从不同植被类型看,高山植被的多年平均nEVI最大(0.79)且减少趋势最不明显;(4)由主成分分析得出生境指标NDRI和SM,结构指标LAI和SHDI,功能指标GPP是脆弱性变化的主导因素;(5)利用Hurst指数与Sen趋势分析结果叠加分析,结果共计有46.36%的nEVI出现弱持续性降低特征,生态存在一定失衡风险。未来应重视岩溶中高山区的天然林保护和其他区域人工林的可持续经营和生态系统适应性管理。

Abstract: Implementing ecological restoration is an important initiative to improve the vulnerability of natural ecosystems. This study aimed to reveal the characteristics of natural ecosystem vulnerability and the sustainability of future changes in the southwest karst region of China. Based on the habitat-structure-function quantitative framework, a system of indicators reflecting the vulnerability of natural ecosystems was selected to assess the vulnerability of natural ecosystems in China's southwestern karst region from 2001 to 2022. The results showed that: (1) In general, the natural ecosystem vulnerability index (nEVI) of China's southwestern karst region was high in the central and northern parts and low in the southern and eastern parts, with a decreasing trend in the inter-annual average nEVI (R2=0.17, P<0.05); (2) In terms of different geomorphological zones, the multi-year average nEVI of karst middle and high mountainous areas was the largest (0.73) and the decreasing trend was the least significant; (3) In terms of different vegetation types, the multi-year average nEVI of alpine vegetation was the largest (0.79) and the decreasing trend was the least significant; (4) The principal component analysis indicated that the habitat indicators of NDRI and SM, the structural indicators of LAI and SHDI, and the functional indicator of GPP were the dominant factors for the vulnerability change; (5) The Hurst index and the trend analysis of Sen indicated that a total of 46.36% of the nEVI showed a weak persistent decrease. There existed a certain risk of ecological imbalance. In the future, attention should be paid to the protection of natural forests in karst middle and high mountainous areas and the sustainable management of plantation forests in other areas. The adaptive management of ecosystems should also be encouraged.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!