长江流域资源与环境 >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (6): 1340-1353.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202406017

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于遥感生态指数的赣抚平原灌区生态环境质量变化评价

李琴1,詹聪1,张金生3,邓海龙3,贾卓2*   

  1. (1.江西省科学院能源研究所,江西 南昌 330096;2.南昌大学工程建设学院,江西 南昌 330038;3.江西省灌溉试验中心站, 江西 南昌 330201)
  • 出版日期:2024-06-20 发布日期:2024-06-26

#br# Evaluation of Ecological Environment Quality Change in Ganfu Plains Irrigation Area Based on Remote Sensing Ecological Index

LI Qin1, ZHAN Cong1, ZHANG Jin-sheng3, DENG Hai-long3, JIA Zhuo2   

  1. (1.Institute of Energy Research, Jiangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanchang 330096, China;2.School of Infrastructure Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330038, China;3.Jiangxi Center Station of Irrigation Experiment, Nanchang 330201, China)
  • Online:2024-06-20 Published:2024-06-26

摘要: 赣抚平原灌区是江南最大的引水灌区,也是江西省灌溉面积最大的灌区,被视为典型的“人—社会—自然”复合生态系统。为探究赣抚平原灌区近20年来的生态环境变化状况,基于2002、2008、2015、2021年的Landsat TM/OLI遥感影像数据,应用主成分分析法将绿度(NDVI)、湿度(WET)、干度(NDBSI)、热度(LST)4个指标集成构建了遥感生态指数(RSEI),对灌区2002~2021年的生态环境质量变化进行评价。结果表明:2002~2021年间赣抚平原灌区生态环境持续向好,RSEI均值由0.477增至0.552,增幅达15.71%,其中绿度和热度对生态质量影响最大;灌区的RSEI等级以中等等级为主,近20年来优、良好等级面积持续增加,48.37%的区域生态质量在变好,其中抚河东岸、进贤县境内的改善情况最为突出;受城市扩张以及干旱化水文气象的影响,生态环境质量变差区域多分布于主城区、农灌区、河湖沿岸地带,因此能否在灌区现代化建设的同时统筹气候变化与生态环境保护是实现灌区永续发展的关键。研究结果能够较好地表征赣抚平原灌区生态环境质量状况的变化,可为区域生态环境治理与保护提供理论参考和科学依据。

Abstract: The Ganfu Plains irrigation area is the largest water diversion irrigation area in Jiangnan and the largest irrigation area in Jiangxi Province. It is considered a typical "human-society-nature" composite ecosystem. To evaluate the ecological environment quality change of Ganfu Plains irrigation area from 2002 to 2021, the remote sensing ecological index (RSEI) was constructed by integrating four indicators of NDVI, WET, NDBSI and LST with the principal component analysis method. The Landsat TM/OLI remote sensing image data in 2002, 2008, 2015 and 2021 were used. The results showed that the ecological environment of Ganfu Plains irrigation area continued to improve from 2002 to 2021. The mean value of RSEI increased from 0.477 to 0.552, with an increase of 15.71%. NDVI and LST were the most significant influencing factors on ecological quality. The RSEI level of the irrigation area was mainly at the medium level. In the past 20 years, the area of excellent and fine ecological quality grades continued to increase with a rate of 48.37%.The most prominent improvement was in the east bank of Fuhe River and Jinxian County. Because of urban expansion and hydrometeorological drought, areas with deteriorating ecological environment quality were mostly distributed in the main urban areas, agricultural areas and coastal areas of rivers and lakes. Therefore, whether to coordinate climate change and ecological environment protection while modernizing irrigation areas was the key to achieve sustainable development in irrigation areas. The research results reflected the changes in the ecological environment quality of the Ganfu Plains irrigation area, and provided theoretical reference and scientific basis for regional ecological environment governance and protection.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[2] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[3] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[4] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[5] 刘钢, 刘坤琳, 汪玮茜, 赵爽. 水质感知视角下水库移民满意度分析——基于有序逻辑回归的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .
[6] 戢晓峰, 刘丁硕. 基于3D理论与SEM的县域交通可达性与空间贫困的耦合机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1360 .
[7] 张大鹏, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 岳洋, 任亚文. 上海大都市区物流企业区位分布特征及其演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[8] 侯雯嘉, 陈长青, 乔辉, 孙新素, 周曙东. 1980~2009年长江下游地区油菜冻害时空特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .
[9] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .
[10] 伍文琪, 罗贤, 黄玮。李运刚. 云南省水资源承载力评价与时空分布特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1385 .